| Literature DB >> 27677167 |
Luis M Bedoya1, Manuela Beltrán, Patricia Obregón-Calderón, Javier García-Pérez, Humberto E de la Torre, Nuria González, Mayte Pérez-Olmeda, David Auñón, Laura Capa, Eduardo Gómez-Acebo, José Alcamí.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the toxicity and activity against HIV of 5-hydroxytyrosol as a potential microbicide.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27677167 PMCID: PMC5106087 DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS ISSN: 0269-9370 Impact factor: 4.177
Fig. 1(a) Evaluation of the anti-HIV activity of 5-hydroxytyrosol in MT-2 cells, TZM-Luc cells and human primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells preactivated with PHA/interleukin-2.
Fig. 2Combination effect in anti-HIV activity of 5-hydroxytyrosol and tenofovir or emtricitabine or lamivudine in MT-2 cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preactivated with PHA/interleukin-2 infected with NL4.3-Ren.
Fig. 3Evaluation of the anti-HIV activity 5-hydroxytyrosol in resistant HIV to NRTIs (K65R, M184V and double resistant), multiresistant HIV (NRTIs, NNRTIs and protease inhibitors) and integrase inhibitors resistant (Q148K) in infections of MT-2 cells and reactivated peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Fig. 45-Hydroxytyrosol activity on A, C, D, E, F and G HIV-1 subtypes and founder viruses S5.1, S8.1 and S14 (6.1) on cell lines and preactivated peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
In-vivo evaluation of 5-hydroxytyrosol toxicity. 5-Hydroxytyrosol was administered at three different doses for 14 consecutive days by topical route to the vaginal mucosa. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the treatment period and mortality/viability, clinical signs, microbiological assessment, vaginal pH and macroscopic and microscopic examination of the genital apparatus of each animal were performed.
| Vagina | |||||||
| Microbiological assessment | |||||||
| Clinical signs | Mortality/viability | Macroscopic examination | Microscopic examination | pH (mean ± SD) | Vaginal exudate before treatments | Vaginal mucosa after treatments | |
| Group 1: blank control ( | Swelling in the genital area for several days ( | 0 | LI: Grade 1 or 2 in proximal, medial and/or distal parts ( | 7.46 ± 0.30 | |||
| VC: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| E: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| Group 2: placebo HEC gel ( | – | 0 | LI: Grade 1 or 2 in proximal or medial parts ( | 7.80 ± 0.48 | |||
| VC: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| E: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| Group 3: 5-hydroxytyrosol gel 30 mmol/l ( | – | 0 | LI: Grade 1 or 2 in proximal, medial and/or distal parts ( | 7.73 ± 0.27 | |||
| VC: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| E: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| Group 4: 5-hydroxytyrosol gel 100 mmol/l ( | – | 0 | VC: Grade 1 ( | 7.66 ± 0.39 | |||
| E: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| Group 5: 5-hydroxytyrosol gel 200 mmol/l ( | – | 0 | LI: Grade 1 or 2 in proximal and medial parts ( | 7.55 ± 0.35 | |||
| VC: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
| E: Grade 1 ( | |||||||
aMacroscopic examination: n means number of animals with signs of irritation in the vaginal mucosa.
bMicroscopic examination: leukocyte infiltration (LI) in vaginal mucosa. Vascular congestion (VC) on submucosa (proximal, medial and/or distal parts) and oedema (E) in mucosa (proximal, medial and/or distal parts): absent (grade 0), minimal (grade 1), mild (grade 2), moderate (grade 3) and marked (grade 4).