Literature DB >> 2767584

[Comparative studies of fiberglass and metal brackets].

C Manhartsberger, M Richter, E Gornik.   

Abstract

The demand by patients considered for better esthetics during treatment should be seriously considered. With the introduction of fiberglass brackets one has tried to solve that problem. The purpose of this investigation was: 1. a microscopic examination of the slots of these fiberglass brackets after various periods of wearing; 2. an in vitro investigation of the adhesion of the fiberglass brackets in comparison to metal brackets; The following results were obtained: 1. There are remarkable differences in the slot dimensions between new fiberglass brackets and those which have been in the mouth for varying periods of time. 2. Ligating wires into fiberglass brackets may be difficult because of wing fractures. 3. There are significant differences regarding the adhesion of fiberglass brackets compared with metal brackets. Results of tests carried out under defined conditions (bonding, storage, time-factor) concluded that metal brackets behaved much more favourably; the adhesion of metal brackets was nearly ten times greater than that for fiberglass brackets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2767584     DOI: 10.1007/BF02168739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  21 in total

1.  Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size.

Authors:  I R Reynolds; J A von Fraunhofer
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1976-04

2.  [Orthodontic contributions to oral rehabilitation].

Authors:  M Richter; S Kulmer
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1977-02

3.  A preliminary study of orthodontic treatment with the use of directly bonded brackets.

Authors:  K S Daft; A A Lugassy
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1974-04

4.  Current status of bonding attachments.

Authors:  G V Newman
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1973-07

5.  Changes in bracket slot tolerance following recycling of direct-bond metallic orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  M E Hixson; W A Brantley; J J Pincsak; J P Conover
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-06

6.  Evaluation of fourteen direct-bonding orthodontic bases.

Authors:  P T Dickinson; J M Powers
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-12

7.  Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases.

Authors:  J I Lopez
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-06

8.  A clinical evaluation of the differential force concept as applied to the edgewise bracket.

Authors:  G F Andreasen; D Zwanziger
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-07

9.  A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire.

Authors:  C A Frank; R J Nikolai
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-12

10.  Dental esthetic self-evaluation and satisfaction.

Authors:  L W Graber; G W Lucker
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  [The friction behavior of the ceramic bracket in arch wire-guided tooth movement].

Authors:  H A Schumacher; C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1990-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.