Literature DB >> 27673533

How Should Results of Nonsurgical Subcutaneous Fat Removal Be Assessed? Accuracy of B-Mode Ultrasound.

Fritz E Barton1,2, Phillip B Dauwe1,2, Tara Stone1,2, Elizabeth Newman1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonsurgical fat reduction has become extremely popular among patients; however, a reliable method of measuring its efficacy has not been established.
METHODS: Ultrasound measurement of human female abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness was carried out on five volunteers. Forty-seven measurements were performed using a GE Venue 40 diagnostic ultrasound device with a 12-MHz transducer. Transducer pressure measurements were recorded simultaneously according to the protocol described by Toomey et al..
RESULTS: Reproducible measurements of abdomen subcutaneous fat could be consistently achieved with a margin of error (95 percent CI) of ±0.558 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a protocol with a transducer pressure less than 1 N (Toomey protocol) allows accurate and reliable measurement of subcutaneous fat. The authors further conclude that such a protocol is practically reproducible in the clinical setting and should be the standard for evaluating the results of nonsurgical fat removal, particularly in the abdomen. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27673533     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  2 in total

Review 1.  Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results.

Authors:  Alain J Azzi; Ann-Sophie Lafrenière; Alex Viezel-Mathieu; Thomas M Hemmerling; Mirko Gilardino
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

2.  The Expanding Role of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.