Naoko Ishiguro1, Haruhiko Yoshida2. 1. Department of Pathobiological Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishimachi, Yonago, Tottori 683-8503, Japan. Electronic address: guroko@med.tottori-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Pathology, Yonago Medical Center, 4-17-1 Kuzumo, Yonago, Tottori 683-0006, Japan.
Abstract
Alveolar soft part sarcoma is an extremely rare soft tissue sarcoma with poor prognosis. It is characterized by the unbalanced recurrent chromosomal translocation der(17)t(X;17)(p11;q25), resulting in the generation of an ASPL-TFE3 fusion gene. ASPL-TFE3 oncoprotein functions as an aberrant transcriptional factor and is considered to play a crucial role in the tumorigenesis of alveolar soft part sarcoma. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, we identified p21 (p21WAF1/CIP1) as a direct transcriptional target of ASPL-TFE3. Ectopic ASPL-TFE3 expression in 293 cells resulted in cell cycle arrest and significant increases in protein and mRNA levels of p21. ASPL-TFE3 activated p21 expression in a p53-independent manner through direct transcriptional interactions with the p21 promoter region. When ASPL-TFE3 was expressed in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a tetracycline-inducible manner, we observed the up-regulation of p21 expression and the induction of senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity. Suppression of p21 significantly decreased the induction of ASPL-TFE3-mediated cellular senescence. Furthermore, ASPL-TFE3 expression in mesenchymal stem cells resulted in a significant up-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines associated with senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). These results show that ASPL-TFE3 regulates cell cycle progression and induces cellular senescence by up-regulating p21 expression. In addition, our data suggest a potential mechanism by which ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence may play a role in tumorigenesis by inducing SASP, which could promote the protumorigenic microenvironment.
Alveolar soft part sarcoma is an extremely rare soft tissue sarcoma with poor prognosis. It is characterized by the unbalanced recurrent chromosomal translocation der(17)t(X;17)(p11;q25), resulting in the generation of an ASPL-TFE3 fusion gene. ASPL-TFE3 oncoprotein functions as an aberrant transcriptional factor and is considered to play a crucial role in the tumorigenesis of alveolar soft part sarcoma. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, we identified p21 (p21WAF1/CIP1) as a direct transcriptional target of ASPL-TFE3. Ectopic ASPL-TFE3 expression in 293 cells resulted in cell cycle arrest and significant increases in protein and mRNA levels of p21. ASPL-TFE3 activated p21 expression in a p53-independent manner through direct transcriptional interactions with the p21 promoter region. When ASPL-TFE3 was expressed in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a tetracycline-inducible manner, we observed the up-regulation of p21 expression and the induction of senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity. Suppression of p21 significantly decreased the induction of ASPL-TFE3-mediated cellular senescence. Furthermore, ASPL-TFE3 expression in mesenchymal stem cells resulted in a significant up-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines associated with senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). These results show that ASPL-TFE3 regulates cell cycle progression and induces cellular senescence by up-regulating p21 expression. In addition, our data suggest a potential mechanism by which ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence may play a role in tumorigenesis by inducing SASP, which could promote the protumorigenic microenvironment.
Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an extremely rare sarcoma with unclear origins, comprising 0.5% to 1.0% of all soft tissue sarcomas [1]. Although ASPS typically presents as a slow-growing tumor, its overall survival rate is poor because of chemoresistance and the high incidence of pulmonary and brain metastases during the early stages of this disease [2], [3], [4]. Moreover, almost all cases of ASPS have the unbalanced recurrent chromosomal translocation der(17)t(X;17)(p11;q25), which results in generation of the ASPL-TFE3 (also known as ASPSCR1-TFE3) fusion gene [5]. Because the ASPL gene is joined in frame with either the third (type 1) or fourth (type 2) exon of TFE3, two types of fusion transcripts have been identified [5].TFE3 belongs to the microphthalmia transcription factor-transcription factor E (MiTF-TFE) basic helix–loop-helix leucine zipper transcription factor family, which binds to the E-box DNA consensus sequence CANNTG [6], [7]. In a subset of renal cell carcinomas with the translocation Xp11.2, TFE3 fuses with PRCC, CLTC, PSF, NonO, PARP14, LUC7L3, KHSRP, and DVL2, resulting in the expression of PRCC-TFE3, CLTC-TFE3, PSF-TFE3, NonO-TFE3, PARP14-TFE3, LUC7L3-TFE3, KHSRP-TFE3, and DVL2-TFE3 fusion oncogenes, respectively [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. In addition, ASPL-TFE3-positive renal cell tumors have also been reported [15]. The cellular roles of ASPL have only been partially characterized, but the mouse homolog TUG is a tethering protein that forces the retention of GLUT4-containing vesicles in the cytoplasm in the absence of insulin [16].The ASPL-TFE3 fusion gene retains the DNA binding and activation domain of TFE3, whereas the N-terminal region of TFE3 is replaced with ASPL sequences [5]. The ASPL-TFE3 oncoprotein is believed to play crucial roles in the progression of ASPS. ASPL-TFE3 functions as an aberrant transcriptional factor and induces the inappropriate up-regulation of various molecules that contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of ASPS [17]. Indeed, several TFE3 fusion oncoproteins, including ASPL-TFE3, up-regulate the Met receptor tyrosine kinase gene and induce oncogenic phenotypes such as uncontrolled cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [18]. However, the molecular roles of ASPL-TFE3 are poorly understood.Deregulated cell proliferation is critical to tumor formation and progression. Because TFE3 plays roles in the regulation of cell growth [19], [20], [21], we hypothesized that ASPL-TFE3 may affect the proliferation of tumor cells by inducing inappropriate expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins. Therefore, we investigated the effects of ASPL-TFE3 on the cell cycle machinery. In this paper, we report that ASPL-TFE3 affected the cell cycle machinery by the direct transcriptional up-regulation of p21. In addition, we reveal that the expression of ASPL-TFE3 in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) induced p21-mediated cellular senescence and increased the mRNA level of proinflammatory cytokines.
Materials and Methods
Cells
HeLahuman cervical carcinoma cells, 293 human embryonic kidney cells, KATO III humangastric cancer cells, and UE7T-13human bone marrow-derived MSCs, which were immortalized using retroviruses expressing human papillomavirus protein E7 and humantelomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) [22], were obtained from Health Science Research Resource Bank (Osaka, Japan). Cells were maintained under 5% CO2 at 37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum.
Tissue Sample
Frozen tissue was obtained from a patient who underwent surgical treatment for ASPS. Written informed consent was obtained for tissue to be used in research. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tottori University.
Cloning and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was isolated from frozen tissue of ASPSpatient using ISOGEN (Nippon GENE, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions and a cDNA clone encoding humanASPL-TFE3 was subsequently amplified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using a Takara PrimeScript High Fidelity RT-PCR kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan) with the following primers: forward, 5′-AAGCTTCACCATGGCGGCCCCGGCAGGC-3′ (including HindIII site and Kozak sequence), and reverse, 5′-TCACTTGTCGTCATCGTCTTTGTAGTCGGACTCCTCTTCCATGCT-3′ (including FLAG epitope tag sequence and STOP codon). Amplified fragments were inserted into the pGeMT-easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and DNA was sequenced using ABI PRISM (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). DNA sequencing confirmed the identity of the type I fusion gene of ASPL-TFE3. Subsequently, ASPL-TFE3 cDNA was digested using HindIII and NotI and inserted into the tetracycline-inducible expression vector pcDNA4/TO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to produce pcDNA/TO-AT.
Transfection and Selection of Clones
For the tetracycline-regulated system (T-Rex system; Invitrogen), 293 and UE7T-13 cells were transfected with pcDNA6/TR (Invitrogen) and either empty pcDNA4/TO vector or pcDNA/TO-AT using FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and these were designated 293/TR-Vec, 293/TR-AT, UE7T/TR-Vec, and UE7T/TR-AT cells, respectively. After 24 h, cells were placed in media containing 5 μg/ml blasticidin (Invitrogen) and 125 μg/ml Zeocin (Invitrogen), and drug-resistant colonies were isolated. Tetracycline (1 μg/ml; Invitrogen) was added to the growth media to induce of ASPL-TFE3 (tested by RT-PCR and western blotting).
Cell Growth Assay
293/TR-AT and UE7T/TR-AT cells were seeded at densities of 1 × 105 and 2 × 104 cells per well, respectively, in 6 well plates. Tetracycline or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was added to the media and cells were cultured for designated times. Subsequently, cells were trypsinized and counted using a trypan blue dye exclusion test.
Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Analysis
Cells were trypsinized, harvested, and fixed at −20°C in 70% ethanol for at least overnight. Fixed cells were stained with 1 ml of propidium iodide (PI) solution (0.05% NP-40, 50 μg/ml propidium iodide, and 10 μg/ml RNase A) for at least 2 h at 4°C. Stained cells were analyzed using an EPICS ALTRA flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).
Western Blot
Cells were suspended in lysis buffer (0.1% SDS, 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 4 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin), and were then centrifuged. Lysate samples containing 10 to 20 μg of protein were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). PVDF membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies and signals were detected using Pierce Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Antibodies against p21, p27, p16, and cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) 2 were obtained from BD Transduction Laboratories (Franklin Lakes, NJ). Antibodies against FLAG and actin were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO). Rb antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA) and Cdk4 antibody was obtained from Epitomics (Burlingame, CA). Phosphorylated-Rb (Ser807/811) antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA).
Plasmids
The p21 promoter (−2264 to +11 base pairs) was obtained from the DNA Bank, RIKEN BioResource Center (Ibaraki, Japan) and was subcloned into the pGV-B2 vector (Toyo Ink, Tokyo, Japan).
Luciferase Reporter Assay
Cells were plated on 35-mm culture dishes at a density of 2 × 105 per dish. On the next day, the cells were transfected with 0.5 μg of the luciferase reporter plasmid, a total of 0.5 μg of expression plasmids, and 0.75 μg of the pSV-β-gal vector (Promega) as a reference using FuGENE HD reagent (Roche). After 24 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured using a Luciferase Assay System (Promega). The activity of firefly luciferase was normalized with the β-galactosidase Enzyme Assay System (Promega).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed using ChIP-IT Express Kits (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. After lysis, nuclei were isolated using a Dounce homogenizer and were digested in enzymatic shearing cocktail for 10 min. Chromatin isolates were then incubated overnight with antibodies against FLAG (Sigma) or mouse IgG (negative control) and protein G magnetic beads at 4°C with gentle agitation. Subsequently, the beads were collected and washed, and chromatin–protein complexes were eluted. Cross-linking was then reversed by incubation for 15 min at 95°C and purified DNA was subjected to PCR amplification using the primers 5′-TGTTTCAGGCACAGAAAGGAGGCA-3′ and 5′-AAATCCCTGTGGTTGCAGCAGCTT-3′ for the −1239 to −806 bp region of the p21 promoter.
Total RNA was isolated from cells using RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and first strand cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using PrimeScript RT Reagent Kits (Takara) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequently, cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR using Express qPCR SuperMix (Invitrogen) or GoTaq Probe qPCR master mix (Promega). The primers used were as follows: p21WAF/CIP1, 5′-TCACTGTCTTGTACCCTTGTGC-3′ and 5′-GGCGTTTGGAGTGGTAGAAA-3′; IL1A, 5′-AACCAGTGCTGCTGAAGGA-3′ and 5′-TTCTTAGTGCCGTGAGTTTCC-3′; IL1B, 5′-AAAGCTTGGTGATGTCTGGTC-3′ and 5′-GGACATGGAGAACACCACTTG-3′; IL6, 5′-TTCTCCACAAGCGCCTTC-3′ and 5′-GGAATCTTCTCCTGGGGGTA-3′; IL8, 5′-GAGCACTCCATAAGGCACAAA-3′ and 5′-ATGGTTCCTTCCGGTGGT-3′; beta-actin, 5′-GCACCCAGCACAATGAAGA-3′ and 5′-CGATCCACACGGAGTACTTG-3′. Gene expression was normalized to that of beta-actin, and data were analyzed using the comparative Ct method.
Senescence-Associated β-Galactosidase Staining
Cells were fixed by incubation in 2% formaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde/PBS for 5 min at room temperature and were then stained with X-gal solution (1 mg/mL X-gal, 5 mM K3Fe[CN]6, 5 mM K4Fe[CN]6, 2 mM MgCl2 in 40 mM citric acid/Na phosphate buffer at pH 6.0) at 37°C for 24 h.
RNA Interference
Cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 5 × 104 per well and were transfected with 150 ng siRNAs using HiPerFect reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The two humanp21 siRNAs were purchased from Sigma Genosys (Sigma Genosys Japan, Hokkaido, Japan) and the control siRNA was obtained from Qiagen. The corresponding p21 siRNA sequences were GAUGGAACUUCGACUUUGUUU (sense-1), ACAAAGUCGAAGUUCCAUCUU (antisense-1), CAGACCAGCAUGACAGAUUUU (sense-2), and AAUCUGUCAUGCUGGUCUGUU (antisense-2).
Statistical Analysis
The statistical significances were determined by Student's t-test and P values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results
ASPL-TFE3 Induces Cell Cycle Arrest in 293 Cells
We established 293 cells that express ASPL-TFE3 in a tetracycline-inducible manner, and designated them as 293/TR-AT cells. Induction of ASPL-TFE3 expression by tetracycline addition was confirmed by immunoblotting (Figure 1A). To determine whether ASPL-TFE3 expression affects cell proliferation, 293/TR-AT cells were cultured with tetracycline and their proliferation was evaluated. As shown in Figure. 1B, the induction of ASPL-TFE3 expression in 293/TR-AT cells inhibited cell proliferation. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis revealed that ASPL-TFE3 expression resulted in an increase in the population of cells in the G0/G1 phase, with a concomitant decrease in the number of cells in the S phase (Figure 1C), suggesting that ASPL-TFE3 induces growth arrest in 293 cells.
Figure 1
Effects of ASPL-TFE3 on cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. (A) 293/TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence of tetracycline for the indicated times and were then subjected to immunoblot analyses using the indicated antibodies. The expression levels of ASPL-TFE3 were examined using immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody. (B) 293/TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence or absence of tetracycline (+ or − Tet) for the indicated times and the cell numbers were determined. Experiments were performed twice with triplicate determinations for each time point. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). (C) Cell cycle distributions of 293/TR-AT cells were analyzed using FACS. 293/TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence or absence of tetracycline (+ or − Tet) for the indicated times and were then stained with PI for FACS analyses.
ASPL-TFE3 Increases p21 mRNA and Protein Expression
Because cell cycle progression is regulated by complexes of cell cycle regulatory proteins that include cyclins, Cdk, and Cdk inhibitors, we analyzed the expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in 293/TR-AT cells following tetracycline treatment. The induction of ASPL-TFE3 expression resulted in an increase in protein level of the Cdk inhibitor p21 [23], [24], whereas the expression levels of other cell cycle regulatory proteins, including p27, p16, p53, Cdk2, and Cdk4, showed no remarkable changes (Figure 2A). Up-regulated p21 protein expression was detectable as early as 2 h after tetracycline treatment, in parallel with ASPL-TFE3 protein expression (Supplementary Figure 1). We further investigated the phosphorylation level of Rb, which plays a key role during the transition from G0/G1 to S phases [25], [26], and observed a decrease in its phosphorylation level after tetracycline treatment (Figure 2A). These findings indicate that ASPL-TFE3 expression increases p21 protein level and decreases the phosphorylation level of Rb, resulting in growth arrest of 293 cells.
Figure 2
ASPL-TFE3 up-regulates p21. (A) 293/TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence of tetracycline for the indicated times and were then subjected to immunoblot analyses using the indicated antibodies. (B) HeLa cells were transiently transfected with either the vector control or the ASPL-TFE3 expression vector and were incubated for 24 h. Cell lysates were then subjected to immunoblotting using antibodies against FLAG, p21, and actin. (C) p21 mRNA levels were determined using real-time quantitative PCR in 293/TR-AT cells cultured in the presence of tetracycline for 0 or 24 h. Relative p21 expression was analyzed using quantitative PCR and gene expression data were normalized to those for beta-actin. Data are presented as fold changes in mRNA levels relative to no treatment (0 h) from three independent experiments. Error bars show SD; ***P < .005.
To further confirm ASPL-TFE3-induced up-regulation of p21, we transiently transfected HeLa cells with ASPL-TFE3 and subsequently observed an increase in p21 protein expression (Figure 2B). Moreover, in real-time quantitative RT-PCR analyses, the induction of ASPL-TFE3 expression in 293/TR-AT cells resulted in an approximately 5-fold increase in p21 mRNA level (Figure 2C).
p21 is a Direct Target Gene of ASPL-TFE3
Because the ASPL-TFE3 fusion oncoprotein functions as an aberrant transcription factor, we investigated whether ASPL-TFE3 activates the p21 gene promoter using luciferase reporter assays of the full-length humanp21 promoter. Cotransfection of the ASPL-TFE3 expression vector and the reporter vector in HeLa cells caused a marked increase in luciferase activity compared with that following transfection with the control empty vector (Figure 3A). Because p53 is a well-known inducer of p21 [23], we determined whether p53 is required for activation of the p21 promoter by ASPL-TFE3, and found that transiently expressed ASPL-TFE3 activated the p21 gene promoter in p53-deficient (p53−/−) KATO III cells (Figure 3A). We next investigated the binding of ASPL-TFE3 to the p21 promoter using ChIP assays with an anti-FLAG antibody. After 24 h of incubation with tetracycline, DNA–protein complexes were immunoprecipitated from 293/TR-AT cells and direct binding of the FLAG-tagged ASPL-TFE3 with the endogenous p21 promoter was observed (Figure 3B). Collectively, these results indicate that ASPL-TFE3 directly binds to the p21 promoter and modulates its transcriptional activity independent of p53.
Figure 3
p21 is a direct target of ASPL-TFE3. (A) Luciferase reporter plasmids containing the p21 promoter sequence were co-transfected into HeLa cells or p53-deficient KATO III cells with the indicated amount of empty vector and/or expression vector for ASPL-TFE3. Cells were harvested 24 h after transfection and luciferase activity was assayed. Data are presented as the fold changes in luciferase activity relative to that in cells transfected with the control vector. Data are presented as mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. ***P < .005. (B) ChIP analysis of 293/TR-AT cells using PCR primers specific for the p21 promoter. Chromatin was isolated from 293/TR-AT cells cultured in the presence of tetracycline for 0 or 24 h, immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody or control mouse IgG, followed by analysis by PCR amplification. Input represents the enzymatically sheared chromatin prior to immunoprecipitation.
ASPL-TFE3 Induces Cellular Senescence in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Various cellular stresses, including DNA damage and oncogene expression, cause irreversible cell cycle arrest termed premature senescence [27]. Besides its effect on cell cycle progression, p21 has been reported to induce cellular senescence [27], [28]. Thus, we hypothesized that ASPL-TFE3-mediated up-regulation of p21 may contribute to the induction of cellular senescence. To investigate this possibility, we assessed the activity of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal), a well-defined senescence biomarker [29], in 293/TR-AT cells. However, the proportions of SA-β-gal-positive cells were independent of ASPL-TFE3 expression (data not shown).Oncogene expression induces premature senescence termed oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) in certain cell types, including primary fibroblasts and progenitor/stem cells [27], [30]. Furthermore, recent studies have reported that the expression of sarcoma-associated fusion oncogenes in MSCs can lead to the development of tumors resembling sarcomas [31], [32], [33], [34], suggesting that MSCs are a potential model for analyzing the pathogenesis of sarcomas with specific fusion proteins. Therefore, we established a tetracycline-inducible system for ASPL-TFE3 in UE7T-13human bone marrow-derived MSCs (UE7T/TR-AT cells) and confirmed the induction of ASPL-TFE3 expression by tetracycline addition using immunoblotting (Figure 4A). As shown in Figure 4B, the addition of tetracycline resulted in suppression of the proliferation of UE7T/TR-AT cells. We next examined the expression of cell cycle regulators in UE7T/TR-AT cells and found that the induction of ASPL-TFE3 expression markedly increased p21 protein expression, whereas the expression of p53, p16, and p27 showed no remarkable changes (Figure 4C). To determine whether ASPL-TFE3 expression induces cellular senescence, we performed SA-β-gal staining in UE7T/TR-AT cells following tetracycline treatment (Figure 4D). ASPL-TFE3 expression in UE7T/TR-AT cells resulted in an increase in the percentage of SA-β-gal-positive cells from 2% at 0 h to 20% at 24 h and 32% at 48 h after tetracycline treatment (Figure 4E). The proportions of SA-β-gal-positive cells were increased by 46% at 4 days after tetracycline treatment, followed by a slight decrease to 35% at 8 days after tetracycline treatment (Supplementary Figure 2).
Figure 4
ASPL-TFE3 induces cellular senescence in mesenchymal stem cells. (A) UE7T/TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence of tetracycline for the indicated times and were then subjected to immunoblot analyses using the indicated antibodies. (B) UE7T/TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence or absence of tetracycline (+ or − Tet) for the indicated times and cell numbers were then determined. Experiments were performed twice with triplicate determinations for each time point. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P < .05. (C) UE7T/TR-Vec and UE7T/TR-AT cells were incubated with tetracycline for 0, 24, and 48 h and were then subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. (D) SA-β-gal staining was performed in UE7T/TR-Vec and UE7T/TR-AT cells after tetracycline treatment for 0, 24, and 48 h. (E) Proportions of SA-β-gal-positive cells in cultures of UE7T/TR-Vec and UE7T/TR-AT cells were calculated after tetracycline treatment for 0, 24, and 48 h. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. **P < .01; ***P < .005.
p21 is a Mediator of ASPL-TFE3-Induced Senescence
To determine whether p21 contributes to the induction of cellular senescence by ASPL-TFE3, we suppressed p21 expression using p21 siRNAs (p21–1 and p21–2) in tetracycline-treated UE7T/TR-AT cells (Figure 5A). UE7T/TR-AT cells were transfected with either control siRNA or p21 siRNAs, and SA-β-gal staining was performed (Figure 5B). After 48 h of incubation with tetracycline, 31% of control siRNA-transfected cells were positive for SA-β-gal staining, whereas the transfection of p21 siRNAs p21–1 and p21–2 decreased the proportions of SA-β-gal-positive cells to 16% and 17%, respectively (Figure 5C). These findings indicate that ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence is mediated at least in part by p21 expression.
Figure 5
Suppression of p21 reduces ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence. (A) UE7T/TR-AT cells were transfected with either control siRNA or p21 siRNAs (p21–1 and p21–2), and were then cultured in the presence of tetracycline (Tet +) for 48 h. Lysates of untreated UE7T/TR-AT cells (−) or siRNA-transfected cells were subjected to immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. (B) SA-β-gal staining was performed in untreated UE7T/TR-AT cells (−) or UE7T/TR-AT cells transfected with either control siRNA or p21 siRNAs (p21–1 and p21–2) after tetracycline treatment for 48 h. (C) Proportions of SA-β-gal-positive cells were calculated for all treatment groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *P < .05; ***P < .005.
ASPL-TFE3 Up-Regulates The Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines
One of the hallmarks of senescent cells is the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which influences the microenvironment via the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors [35], [36]. Senescent cells have undergone widespread changes in protein expression and secretion, ultimately leading to the SASP. Despite the tumor-suppressing role of senescence-associated cell cycle arrest, SASP has been suggested to promote tumorigenesis [36]. Thus, we examined the expression of representative SASP-associated proinflammatory cytokines, including IL1A, IL1B, IL6, and IL8, in tetracycline-treated UE7T/TR-AT cells by quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 6). At 4 days after tetracycline treatment, the expression of IL1A, IL1B, and IL8 was significantly increased compared with that of untreated UE7T/TR-AT cells. In contrast, the expression levels of IL1B, IL6, and IL8 were decreased at 1 day after tetracycline treatment, suggesting that the up-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines is probably not due to direct transcriptional up-regulation by ASPL-TFE3.
Figure 6
ASPL-TFE3 up-regulates the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. UE7T-TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence of tetracycline for the indicated days, and then the expression of IL1A, IL1B, IL6, and IL8 was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR. Gene expression data were normalized to those for beta-actin. Data are presented as fold changes in mRNA levels relative to those on day 0 from three independent experiments. Error bars show SD; *P < .05; **P < .01.
Discussion
The presence of the translocation t(X;17)(p11;q25) in almost all ASPS cases suggests that the ASPL-TFE3 fusion gene contributes to tumor formation and progression, but the corresponding oncogenic mechanisms are poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate a novel mechanism by which ASPL-TFE3 regulates cell cycle progression and induces cellular senescence by directly up-regulating p21 expression. In addition, we find that ASPL-TFE3 expression in MSCs induced the expression of proinflammatory cytokines associated with the SASP.Fusion oncogenes that act as transcription factors play critical roles in tumor formation and progression through their transcriptional targets. In this study, we identified p21 as a novel transcriptional target of ASPL-TFE3. Ectopic expression of ASPL-TFE3 in 293 cells resulted in growth arrest and increases in p21 protein and mRNA levels. By luciferase and ChIP assays, we provided evidence that ASPL-TFE3 directly interacts with the p21 promoter region and activates it. Consistent with our results, another TFE3 fusion oncoprotein, PRCCTFE3, which carries the DNA binding domain of TFE3, causes cell cycle delays by transcriptionally up-regulating p21 expression [37]. Thus, TFE3 fusion oncoproteins appear to affect the cell cycle machinery through a p21-mediated mechanism. It should be noted, however, that in clinical samples of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas, p21 protein overexpression has not been observed consistently [38].In this study, we show for the first time that ASPL-TFE3 expression can provoke cellular senescence. The expression of activated oncogenes, such as Ras and fusion oncogenes, induces OIS through activation of the p53/p21 pathway and/or p16 pathway [27], [28]. Our data revealed that ASPL-TFE3 expression in MSCs induced some hallmarks of OIS, including the induction of SA-β-gal activity and increased p21 expression. The expression of ASPL-TFE3 in MSCs increased the protein level of p21 while not affecting the expression of p16, p53, and p27, suggesting that p21 is an important mediator of ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence. Given that ASPL-TFE3 activated the p21 promoter in p53-deficient Kato III cells, ASPL-TFE3 appears to induce senescence in a p53-independent manner.The significance of p21 in ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence was further supported by the observation that the proportion of SA-β-gal-positive cells was decreased after p21 suppression in ASPL-TFE3-expressing UE7T/TR-AT cells. Nevertheless, p21 suppression did not completely abolish the induction of SA-β-gal expression. Recent studies suggest that OIS is mediated by sequential activation of the p38 MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways [39], [40], [41]. Because ASPL-TFE3 activates the MAPK pathway and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway by directly up-regulating MET expression [18], additional pathways that include the MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways may also contribute to the ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence.Our data demonstrate that ASPL-TFE3 expression in MSCs induced cellular senescence, while ASPL-TFE3 expression in 293 cells resulted in growth arrest but failed to induce senescence. These results suggest that the cellular context is important for the molecular roles of ASPL-TFE3. This notion is further supported by evidence that despite harboring the same fusion gene, ASPS is cathepsin K positive, while ASPL-TFE3-positive renal cell carcinoma is cathepsin K negative [42]. The cellular origin of ASPS is currently unclear. However, Goodwin et al. reported that ASPL-TFE3 expression alone, without an additional oncogenic event, is sufficient for invasive sarcomagenesis in mice [43]. Thus, the expression of ASPL-TFE3 in an appropriate cell type may provide clues to understanding the cellular events in ASPS pathogenesis. On the other hand, recent studies have reported that the expression of sarcoma-associated fusion genes, such as EWS-Fli1 and FUS-CHOP, in human MSCs resulted in cellular transformation, implying that MSCs can provide a cellular environment that enables sarcoma-specific fusion proteins to exert their oncogenic potentials [32], [44], [45]. Gene expression profiling studies of ASPS suggest that ASPSs express genes implicated in myogenic, neurogenic, and stem cell differentiation, further supporting the notion that mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells are appropriate for use as a model for studying the biology of ASPS [46], [47]. The issue of whether ASPL-TFE3 can transform human MSCs remains to be clarified, but ASPL-TFE3-expressing MSCs are thought to be a good model for analyzing the cellular events in ASPL-TFE3-associated sarcomagenesis.Cellular senescence is a tumor-suppressive mechanism that prevents uncontrolled proliferation [48], [49], [50], [51]. However, accumulating evidence suggests that senescent cells paradoxically promote tumor progression through the SASP, which can affect their microenvironment via the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors [52], [53], [54]. Our data revealed that ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence in MSCs was accompanied by an increase in the expression of SASP-associated proinflammatory cytokines. SASP factors have been shown to promote tumor progression by inducing proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation (EMT), and invasion, and promoting angiogenesis [55], [56], [57]. Although the exact biological effect of this phenomenon on tumor cell behavior requires further investigation, these observations raise the possibility that ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence can alter the tissue microenvironment by inducing SASP, which can promote malignant phenotypes such as proliferation and invasiveness.In conclusion, we demonstrate that p21 is a novel transcriptional target of ASPL-TFE3 oncoprotein, and that ASPL-TFE3 affects cell cycle machinery and induces cellular senescence by up-regulating p21 expression. Furthermore, the present work provides a potential mechanism by which ASPL-TFE3-induced senescent cells may promote a protumorigenic microenvironment by secreting proinflammatory cytokines. Since senescence plays an important role in tumor prevention and influences the outcome of cancer therapy [58], knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of ASPL-TFE3-induced senescence may provide clues not only for understanding the oncogenic properties of ASPL-TFE3 but also for developing future therapeutic approaches for ASPS.The following are the supplementary data related to this article.Induction of p21 expression by ASPL-TFE3. 293/TR-Vec and 293/TR-AT cells were cultured in the presence of tetracycline for the indicated times and subjected to immunoblotting analysis using anti-FLAG, anti-p21, and anti-actin antibodies.ASPL-TFE3 induces cellular senescence in mesenchymal stem cells. Proportions of SA-β-gal-positive cells in cultures of UE7T/TR-AT cells were calculated after tetracycline treatment for 0, 2, 4, and 8 days. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Authors: Pedram Argani; Jessica Hicks; Angelo M De Marzo; Roula Albadine; Peter B Illei; Marc Ladanyi; Victor E Reuter; George J Netto Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: G P Dimri; X Lee; G Basile; M Acosta; G Scott; C Roskelley; E E Medrano; M Linskens; I Rubelj; O Pereira-Smith Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-09-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: T J Hemesath; E Steingrímsson; G McGill; M J Hansen; J Vaught; C A Hodgkinson; H Arnheiter; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; D E Fisher Journal: Genes Dev Date: 1994-11-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Rene Rodriguez; Juan Tornin; Carlos Suarez; Aurora Astudillo; Ruth Rubio; Carole Yauk; Andrew Williams; Michael Rosu-Myles; Juan M Funes; Chris Boshoff; Pablo Menendez Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Klaas Medendorp; Jan J M van Groningen; Lilian Vreede; Lisette Hetterschijt; Linda Brugmans; Wilhelmina H van den Hurk; Ad Geurts van Kessel Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 3.905
Authors: Masashi Narita; Sabrina Nũnez; Edith Heard; Masako Narita; Athena W Lin; Stephen A Hearn; David L Spector; Gregory J Hannon; Scott W Lowe Journal: Cell Date: 2003-06-13 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jean-Philippe Coppé; Christopher K Patil; Francis Rodier; Yu Sun; Denise P Muñoz; Joshua Goldstein; Peter S Nelson; Pierre-Yves Desprez; Judith Campisi Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2008-12-02 Impact factor: 8.029