Literature DB >> 27672624

Deep Brain Stimulation and Gene Expression Alterations in Parkinson's Disease.

A Mohammadi1, A R Mehdizadeh2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27672624      PMCID: PMC5022754     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng        ISSN: 2251-7200


× No keyword cloud information.
Parkinson disease (PD) is a neurobiological disorder caused by the death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). PD is typically characterized by features including rigidity, tremor, stiffness, and bradykinesia, as well as walking problems. Although, brain imaging and electroencephalography (EEG) is used in the primary evaluation of neurological disorders[1, 2], but it’s unfortunate that PD symptoms appear when approximately 60% of dopaminergic neurons have been destroyed[3]. The discovery of mutations in the genes for parkin (PARK2), DJ-1 (PARK7), PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1), α-synuclein (SNCA), Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Esterase L1 (UCHL1), and Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) has made a unique glance into the mechanisms responsible for the etiology of PD[4]. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuroengineering procedure introduced in 1987 as a surgical handling for movement disorders specially the enervating symptoms of PD[5, 6]. Although, DBS has now been extensively considered as a lucrative method to patients whose medications have intensive signs cannot be sufficiently controlled with drugs, but it can improve movement disorders and the patient’s quality of life. Traditionally, the subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus interna (GPi) and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) are three targets for DBS in PD. Whereas STN stimulation improves tremor, motor scores and some other dysfunctions, but there is also the potential for neurobiological and psychiatric side-effects, including gene expression alteration, hallucinations, depression, hyper-sexuality, apathy and cognitive dysfunction. Despite its noteworthy therapeutic potency, the exact mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of DBS haven’t been determined[7]. There are at least four hypotheses to explain the mechanisms of DBS including Synaptic depression[8], Synaptic inhibition[9], Depolarization blockade[10], and Stimulation-induced disruption of pathological network activity[11]. Regardless of the unclear mechanism of DBS, changes in crucial genes involved in Parkinson’s disease are very important. Although, it has been reported that high-frequency stimulation of the STN (STN HFS) increase striatal dopamine release and improve motor symptoms in intact rats[12, 13], but STN HFS can cause alteration of the genome of an organism which could be useful or harmful as well. For instance, STN HFS upregulate GAD67 mRNA expression in the substantia nigra pars reticulata and entopeduncular nucleus, c-fos in the STN, substance P and enkephalin in the striatum[14], Tyrosine Hydroxylase in the SNc and striatum, PMCH, IGF-2, IGFBP2, USAG1 and F5 in the basal ganglia[15], as well as downregulate of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (CoI) in the STN, calcium / calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type IIA (CaMKIIa), Homer 1, Ania1, KCNC3, Sv2b, TULIP1, LOC81816, CDH22 and IRSp53 in the basal ganglia[14, 15]. Visanji and colleagues (2015) reported that STN-DBS significantly transformed eight genes (Vps33b, Ppp1r3c, Mapk4, Sorcs2, Neto1, Abca1, Penk1, and Gapdh) in DRD2 striatopallidal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) and two overlapping genes in DRD1a MSNs (Penk1 and Ppp1r3c) concerned in the molecular mechanisms of STN-DBS[16]. Soreq et al (2013) demonstrated that DBS modulates nonsense-mediated RNA decay in Parkinson’s patient’s leukocytes[17]. Also, STN HFS induces a significant rise of extracellular GABA levels in the SN and glutamate in the GP and SN[18]. Spieles-Engemann and coworkers (2011) reported that STN-DBS increases brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the nigrostriatal system and primary motor cortex which may be linked to glutamate transmission[19]. Altogether, several open questions remain as to the detailed mechanisms and functions of DBS; particularly in terms of the neurochemical and genomic effects of DBS in the brain. However, many of the cellular and molecular studies are needed to determine the exact mechanism of DBS.
  18 in total

1.  High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons.

Authors:  C Beurrier; B Bioulac; J Audin; C Hammond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation and future technical developments.

Authors:  E B Montgomery; K B Baker
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Deep brain stimulation in a rat model modulates TH, CaMKIIa and Homer1 gene expression.

Authors:  Jeannette Henning; Dirk Koczan; Anne Glass; Thomas Karopka; Jens Pahnke; Arndt Rolfs; Reiner Benecke; Ulrike Gimsa
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Combined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson disease.

Authors:  A L Benabid; P Pollak; A Louveau; S Henry; J de Rougemont
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1987

5.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation increases brain derived neurotrophic factor in the nigrostriatal system and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Anne L Spieles-Engemann; Kathy Steece-Collier; Michael M Behbehani; Timothy J Collier; Susan L Wohlgenant; Christopher J Kemp; Allyson Cole-Strauss; Nathan D Levine; Sara E Gombash; Valerie B Thompson; Jack W Lipton; Caryl E Sortwell
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus selectively reverses dopamine denervation-induced cellular defects in the output structures of the basal ganglia in the rat.

Authors:  Pascal Salin; Christine Manrique; Claude Forni; Lydia Kerkerian-Le Goff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Bilateral chronic electrostimulation of ventroposterolateral pallidum: a new therapeutic approach for alleviating all parkinsonian symptoms.

Authors:  J Siegfried; B Lippitz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Genetic etiology of Parkinson disease associated with mutations in the SNCA, PARK2, PINK1, PARK7, and LRRK2 genes: a mutation update.

Authors:  Karen Nuytemans; Jessie Theuns; Marc Cruts; Christine Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Implementing a Smart Method to Eliminate Artifacts of Vital Signals.

Authors:  A Javadpour; A Mohammadi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2015-12-01

10.  Deep brain stimulation modulates nonsense-mediated RNA decay in Parkinson's patients leukocytes.

Authors:  Lilach Soreq; Hagai Bergman; Zvi Israel; Hermona Soreq
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic Advances in Diabetes, Autoimmune, and Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Jinsha Liu; Joey Paolo Ting; Shams Al-Azzam; Yun Ding; Sepideh Afshar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Surgical Neurostimulation for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Aswin Chari; Ian D Hentall; Marios C Papadopoulos; Erlick A C Pereira
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  Induction of Neuroplasticity by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  A Mohammadi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2016-12-01

4.  Closed- and Open-loop Deep Brain Stimulation: Methods, Challenges, Current and Future Aspects.

Authors:  P Ghasemi; T Sahraee; A Mohammadi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 5.  The Current State of Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain and Its Context in Other Forms of Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Sarah Marie Farrell; Alexander Green; Tipu Aziz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

6.  Cellular, molecular, and clinical mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation-a systematic review on established indications and outlook on future developments.

Authors:  Martin Jakobs; Anton Fomenko; Andres M Lozano; Karl L Kiening
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.137

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.