Literature DB >> 27672519

Development and characterization of 27 microsatellite markers for the mangrove fern, Acrostichum aureum (Pteridaceae).

Takashi Yamamoto1, Yoshiaki Tsuda2, Gustavo Maruyama Mori3, Mariana Vargas Cruz4, Yoshimi Shinmura5, Alison K S Wee6, Koji Takayama7, Takeshi Asakawa5, Takeru Yamakawa5, Monica Suleiman8, Juan Núñez-Farfán9, Edward L Webb10, Yasuyuki Watano5, Tadashi Kajita1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Twenty-seven nuclear microsatellite markers were developed for the mangrove fern, Acrostichum aureum (Pteridaceae), to investigate the genetic structure and demographic history of the only pantropical mangrove plant. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-six A. aureum individuals from three populations were sampled and genotyped to characterize the 27 loci. The number of alleles and expected heterozygosity ranged from one to 15 and 0.000 to 0.893, respectively. Across the 26 polymorphic loci, the Malaysian population showed much higher levels of polymorphism compared to the other two populations in Guam and Brazil. Cross-amplification tests in the other two species from the genus determined that seven and six loci were amplifiable in A. danaeifolium and A. speciosum, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The 26 polymorphic microsatellite markers will be useful for future studies investigating the genetic structure and demographic history of of A. aureum, which has the widest distributional range of all mangrove plants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acrostichum aureum; Pteridaceae; mangrove fern; microsatellite; pantropical distribution; pyrosequencing

Year:  2016        PMID: 27672519      PMCID: PMC5033363          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1600042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Mangroves are intertidal ecosystems that have a pantropical distribution. The distributional range of species inhabiting these ecosystems is typically restricted to either the Indo-West Pacific (IWP) region or the Atlantic-East Pacific (AEP) region (Tomlinson, 1986). How this pattern of distribution formed is one of the main biogeographic questions in mangrove research. Phylogenetic studies have detected significant levels of divergence in several tree species across the IWP and AEP (Rhizophora L. in Duke et al., 2002 and Takayama et al., 2013; and Hibiscus L. in Takayama et al., 2008). However, the divergence history, at a global scale, of many other mangrove plants remains to be clarified. Acrostichum aureum L. (common name “mangrove fern”; Pteridaceae) is of particular interest because this species is the only mangrove plant that is distributed pantropically (i.e., in both the IWP and AEP regions). This species also differs from other mangrove plants in that it has wind-dispersed spores, while most other mangrove plants have sea-dispersed seeds, fruits, or propagules. This different dispersal system might have enabled this species to achieve its relatively wide distribution compared to other mangrove plants. To address this question, it is important to perform population genetic studies to analyze the genetic structure and demographic history of the species using highly polymorphic microsatellite markers. Therefore, we developed novel microsatellite markers for A. aureum using next-generation sequencing. We tested the markers on samples from across the pantropical distribution of the species to check their levels of polymorphism and to determine their usefulness as markers for future studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One sample of A. aureum was collected from Sabah (Malaysia) (Appendix 1), and total DNA extracted using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). We then performed shotgun sequencing, using one-third of a run on a Roche 454 Genome Sequencer Junior (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany). The GS Junior Titanium Sequencing Kit (Roche Applied Science) and Multiplex Identifier (MID) adaptors (see Margulies et al., 2005) were used following the manufacturer’s protocol. The run generated a total of 81,415 reads with an average length of 490 bp. The program QDD version 2.1 (Meglécz et al., 2010) was used to identify di- to hexanucleotide motif microsatellites with at least five repeats. Sequence similarity and establishment contigs were detected following the procedure in Takayama et al. (2011). A total of 1452 perfect microsatellite sequences were obtained and 48 primer pairs designed using the following criteria: (1) PCR product size of 80–300 bp; (2) flanking region containing at least five repetitions of any di- to hexanucleotide motifs; and (3) primers with length 18–27 bp, annealing temperature 57–63°C, and GC content 20–80%. Forty-eight primer pairs with at least 12 repeats of various fragment sizes appropriate for multiplex PCR were selected. The 5′-tailed primer method (Schuelke, 2000) was used to label and visualize the PCR amplicons of the selected primers. The 19-bp U19 sequence (GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACG) was added to the 5′-tail of forward primers, and the GTTT PIG-tail was added to the 5′ end of the reverse primer. This PIG-tail facilitates the addition of adenosine by Taq polymerase, thereby reducing stuttering (Brownstein et al., 1996). PCR amplification tests of each primer pair were performed in individual PCR reactions using two individuals, collected from Sabah (Malaysia) and Pará (Brazil), using the standard protocol of QIAGEN Type-it Microsatellite PCR Kit (QIAGEN), with a final volume of 5.0 μL and 1.0 μM of each primer. The PCR thermal conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; 30–32 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 57°C for 90 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s; and final extension at 60°C for 30 min. The PCR products were electrophoretically separated on 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Thirty loci exhibited clear PCR amplification. Twenty-four individuals sampled from Sabah (Malaysia) were used to assess the quality of amplification and polymorphism of these 30 loci. Loci were amplified using QIAGEN Type-it Microsatellite PCR Kits (QIAGEN) in three tubes, each with 5.0-μL mixtures containing 0.5 μL of 1–10 ng of genomic DNA, 2.5 μL of multiplex PCR master mix buffer, 1.2 μL of primer mix (with the concentration of each primer pair adjusted from 1.0 μM), and 0.8 μL of U19 fluorescent dye–labeled primer (6-FAM, VIC, NED, or PET; 1.0 μM). We used the same PCR protocol as described above. Twenty-seven of the 30 loci showed clear fragment patterns using one singleplex and 11 multiplex PCR sets (two to three primer pairs per multiplex; Table 1). Samples from two more populations (16 individuals each from Piti [Guam] and Pará [Brazil]; Appendix 1) were then included to check the genetic diversity of these loci. Cross-species amplification of these loci was also assessed by testing in the other two species in the genus Acrostichum L.: four individuals of A. danaeifolium Langsd. & Fisch. collected in Pará (Brazil) and Colima (Mexico), and four individuals of A. speciosum Willd. from Sungei Buloh (Singapore) (Appendix 1).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 27 microsatellite markers developed for Acrostichum aureum.[a,b]

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size range (bp)Fluorescent dyeMultiplexDDBJ accession no.
AA07F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACAATGGGCTACTCAAATGGG(GA)17194–246FAMSet 1LC065390
R: GTTTGTGTTCCTTGTATGTCGATCAAT
AA08F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGAAGAGGTGGGACAAGCAAG(AG)16120–150VICSet 4LC065391
R: GTTTGTGGTTGAGAGTGGGTTGA
AA09F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTGCGATGGCTACTTCTCCT(AG)15144–170FAMSet 1LC065392
R: GTTTCCCTTTCTCCACACTCC
AA10F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACAGCCTTGCAACCTGCTCTAC(AC)15197–259VICSet 4LC065393
R: GTTTCCATCATGGCCAGCTTTACT
AA11F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACCCGTAGGCTCTGATACCAA(AC)15129–159NEDSet 8LC065394
R: GTTTCTCCCATGTCAAACACTCCA
AA12F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGCCAGCCTAGACACCTCTTG(TG)15123–159VICSet 5LC065395
R: GTTTGCATGCATAAGAAGACCAACC
AA14F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACAGGTCAAGCACAAGCTCAA(AG)14169–177PETSet 10LC065396
R: GTTTACACCTGCACACTGGTGAGT
AA15F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACAGTTCTTGTCTTGGGTGAGCA(TG)14269–281PETSet 10LC065397
R: GTTTGGAGTAAGCTTGGTGCATATC
AA16F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGGTGCAAGGAGATGCCATAG(GA)14114–134NEDSet 9LC065398
R: GTTTAGTCAGGGTCGTTCAAGCTG
AA17F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGGGTGTGAGGGATTTGAGAA(AG)14118–182VICSet 6LC065399
R: GTTTATCGTTGGAGATGATGGAGG
AA23F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGAGAGGAGAGAAGCAAATAGGG(GA)12285–293NEDSet 7LC065400
R: GTTTGGAGTCTTGGTAGACGGG
AA24F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGTTGAGCCAATGAAATGCT(TG)11267–269FAMSet 2LC065401
R: GTTTAGGAAGAGAAAGCGAGGGAG
AA27F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTCCTCTACTTGAGCTCCC(CA)15140–152NEDSet 7LC065402
R: GTTTCACACAAGAGAGCATGTTTGTA
AA28F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTCTCCTGAAGGGAGTGGTGA(GA)1584–128VICSet 6LC065403
R: GTTTGAGTTCCACACCATGCCAG
AA29F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGAAAGATGCAAAGAAAGGGAGA(AC)15103–135FAMSet 3LC065404
R: GTTTGAAGATGAGAAGTGTGGTCG
AA30F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTCTTCAAGTGTCTTGGGTTTGA(AC)14104–124FAMSet 2LC065405
R: GTTTATTCATGAGGAGCATGACCTA
AA33F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGCGCACCTTGTCCAAGTAAGC(AT)13160–172FAMSet 2LC065406
R: GTTTGGAATAGGTAATGGAGTAGACTTGA
AA34F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTCTTCAATCCTCTCTATAAACTAGCG(CA)13188–216PETSet 12LC065407
R: GTTTCTCACAAGGGAGGCTATCCA
AA35F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGATGAAGCCAAGATCCCAAA(GA)13352–376FAMSet 1LC065408
R: GTTTGCCACCACACCTTCTCTGAT
AA37F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTCCGATCCTTGTTGGTAGC(AG)13173–219VICSet 5LC065409
R: GTTTAAGTGGACGGCGTAATCAAG
AA38F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGCAATGGCGAATAGCGAAGC(TG)13205–223NEDSet 9LC065410
R: GTTTGTCACCCAAGACTCCCTCT
AA40F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGCAGGTTAGAGCTCCCAT(TC)13145–163PETSet 11LC065411
R: GTTTAGTGTCCACCAACCATCCA
AA41F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGATGCAAATCAACCCTTT(CT)13167–199NEDSet 8LC065412
R: GTTTCATGATCCTTACCTTGCCC
AA42F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGAAGGATTGATGCAACCAAGG(AC)13145–165PETSet 12LC065413
R: GTTTCCAATGTGAGCCATCAAGG
AA43F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGGATGGACCTTCTTCGTC(CA)13313–315VICSet 4LC065414
R: GTTTGATGCTCTGATCCCTCCTT
AA46F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGGGAGTGTGACAAGGTGTAAGA(CT)12176–224FAMSet 3LC065415
R: GTTTGACCGAGGCCAAGAATAAGG
AA48F: GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTCTACACGTGGTGGGAGGT(AG)12114–136PETSet 10LC065416
R: GTTTCAAGGCTTCATATGAGGTGAG

Note: DDBJ = DNA Data Bank of Japan.

All values are based on 56 samples representing Sabah (Malaysia), Piti (Guam), and Pará (Brazil) populations (Appendix 1).

Annealing temperature for all loci was 57°C.

Characteristics of 27 microsatellite markers developed for Acrostichum aureum.[a,b] Note: DDBJ = DNA Data Bank of Japan. All values are based on 56 samples representing Sabah (Malaysia), Piti (Guam), and Pará (Brazil) populations (Appendix 1). Annealing temperature for all loci was 57°C. The amplified products were loaded into an ABI3500 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) with GeneScan 600 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems), and their sizes and genotypes were determined using GeneMarker (Holland and Parson, 2011). Expected heterozygosity (He) and fixation index (FIS) were calculated to evaluate genetic diversity of the three populations using FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 (Goudet, 2001; hereafter, FSTAT). The significance of deviations of FIS from zero, as evidenced by deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and genotypic disequilibrium for all locus pairs, were tested by randomization using FSTAT. The obtained P values (with a 0.05 significance threshold) were adjusted based on a sequential Bonferroni correction. The presence of null alleles and their bias on genetic diversity among the three populations (FST) (Weir and Cockerham, 1984) were evaluated using FreeNA (Chapuis and Estoup, 2007). In the Sabah population, the number of alleles detected and He ranged from one to 15 and 0.000 to 0.893, respectively, and 26 of the 27 loci were polymorphic (Table 2). A significant deviation in FIS was found in only one locus (AA16). Although null alleles were detected and their frequencies estimated at each locus (Table 4), the FST value after the null allele correction was 0.619, the same as the original value without correction (= 0.619), suggesting that biases, due to null alleles, in genetic structure analysis would be limited. Although 19 of the 27 loci were amplified in samples from the other two populations, most were fixed for different alleles among populations. Seven and six loci were amplified in A. danaeifolium and A. speciosum, respectively (Table 3).
Table 2.

Genetic variation of the 27 newly developed microsatellite markers in three Acrostichum aureum populations.

LocusSabah, Malaysia (N = 24)Piti, Guam (N = 16)Pará, Brazil (N = 16)
AHoHeFISAHoHeFISAHoHeFIS
AA07120.8750.8930.05210.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA08100.8700.8830.03710.0000.000NA20.1330.3910.678
AA0990.5630.7580.28810.0000.000NA
AA10130.6470.8700.28521.0000.500−1.000*21.0000.500−1.000*
AA1160.5420.6820.226
AA1280.6250.7520.20010.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA1440.3750.5410.32610.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA1560.5830.523−0.09520.0000.305120.0000.2191.000
AA1680.3330.7820.590*
AA17100.8240.8040.00710.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA2350.7620.667−0.11910.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA2410.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA2780.7730.744−0.01610.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA28150.7220.7730.09410.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA2990.7650.8270.10510.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA3060.5830.6810.16410.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA3350.3750.4900.25510.0000.000NA
AA3480.7140.659−0.06010.0000.000NA30.1880.174−0.047
AA35100.8750.855−0.00210.0000.000NA20.1880.170−0.071
AA3790.6880.7320.09320.0000.3051.000*20.0630.0610.000
AA3890.6820.8300.20110.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA
AA40100.8330.8520.04410.0000.000NA20.0670.0640.000
AA4190.7920.8130.04830.2500.5840.59310.0000.000NA
AA42100.8570.8620.03030.2500.4980.52210.0000.000NA
AA4320.0630.1700.651
AA46130.9410.796−0.15310.0000.000NA
AA4890.5830.7450.23710.0000.000NA10.0000.000NA

Note: — = not amplified; A = number of detected alleles; FIS = fixation index; He = expected heterozygosity; N = number of individuals genotyped; NA = not applicable.

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05).

Table 4.

Null allele frequencies at each locus estimated by FreeNA software in three Acrostichum aureum populations.

LocusSabah, Malaysia (N = 24)Piti, Guam (N = 16)Pará, Brazil (N = 16)
AA070.0000.0010.001
AA080.0000.0010.200
AA090.122NA0.001
AA100.1140.0000.000
AA110.111NANA
AA120.0860.0010.001
AA140.1110.0010.001
AA150.0000.2630.224
AA160.247NANA
AA170.0000.0010.001
AA230.0000.0010.001
AA240.0010.001NA
AA270.0000.0010.001
AA280.0000.0010.001
AA290.0530.0010.001
AA300.0480.0010.001
AA330.0900.001NA
AA340.0000.0010.000
AA350.0000.0010.000
AA370.0650.2630.000
AA380.0540.0010.001
AA400.0000.0010.000
AA410.0000.2110.001
AA420.0000.1750.001
AA430.138NANA
AA460.0000.001NA
AA480.0980.0010.001

Note: NA = not applicable.

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

Table 3.

Fragment sizes detected in cross-amplification tests of the 27 newly developed Acrostichum aureum microsatellite markers in two closely related species.

LocusA. danaeifoliumA. speciosum
Pará, Brazil (N = 4)Colima, Mexico (N = 4)Sungei Buloh, Singapore (N = 4)
AA07188
AA08
AA09134–2154134–2158154–2158
AA10
AA11
AA12120–2132
AA14
AA15
AA16
AA17
AA23
AA24
AA27144
AA28
AA29110–2112
AA30
AA33
AA34213
AA35316
AA37
AA38273
AA40
AA41207–219207–2217
AA42175
AA43344–2348344–2348
AA46217–2221
AA48

Note: — = not amplified.

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

Genetic variation of the 27 newly developed microsatellite markers in three Acrostichum aureum populations. Note: — = not amplified; A = number of detected alleles; FIS = fixation index; He = expected heterozygosity; N = number of individuals genotyped; NA = not applicable. Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1. Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05). Fragment sizes detected in cross-amplification tests of the 27 newly developed Acrostichum aureum microsatellite markers in two closely related species. Note: — = not amplified. Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1. Null allele frequencies at each locus estimated by FreeNA software in three Acrostichum aureum populations. Note: NA = not applicable. Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The 26 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed in this study will be useful to evaluate the genetic structure and to infer the past demographic history of A. aureum to study how this mangrove fern achieved the widest distributional range of all mangrove plants. Cross-species amplification also suggested that some markers could be used to evaluate genetic diversity in other species in the same genus.
Appendix 1.

Voucher information for Acrostichum species used in this study.

SpeciesVoucher specimen accession no.aCollection localityGeographic coordinatesN
A. aureum L.TK 11072403 (348–371) (URO)Klias, Sabah, Malaysia5.426454°, 115.559861°24
A. aureumTK 13122001 (1–16) (URO)Piti, Guam13.440381°, 144.678365°16
A. aureumGMM 14112102 (207–222) (UEC)Perimirim, Pará, Brazil−0.973032°, −46.591348°16
A. danaeifolium Langsd. & Fisch.GMM 14112201 (231–234) (UEC)Capanema, Pará, Brazil−1.299979°, −47.099699°4
A. danaeifoliumTK 14071804 (50–53) (URO)Ciudad de Armería, Colima, Mexico18.912410°, −104.036289°4
A. speciosum Willd.TK 091112003 (61–63) (URO)Sungei Buloh, Singapore1.449007°, 103.730684°4

Note: N = number of individuals sampled.

Collectors and herbaria: GMM = Gustavo Maruyama Mori; TK = Tadashi Kajita; UEC = Universidade Estadual de Campinas herbarium; URO = Herbarium, Faculty of Education, University of the Ryukyus.

  8 in total

1.  An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments.

Authors:  M Schuelke
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  GeneMarker® HID: A reliable software tool for the analysis of forensic STR data.

Authors:  Mitchell M Holland; Walther Parson
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors.

Authors:  Marcel Margulies; Michael Egholm; William E Altman; Said Attiya; Joel S Bader; Lisa A Bemben; Jan Berka; Michael S Braverman; Yi-Ju Chen; Zhoutao Chen; Scott B Dewell; Lei Du; Joseph M Fierro; Xavier V Gomes; Brian C Godwin; Wen He; Scott Helgesen; Chun Heen Ho; Chun He Ho; Gerard P Irzyk; Szilveszter C Jando; Maria L I Alenquer; Thomas P Jarvie; Kshama B Jirage; Jong-Bum Kim; James R Knight; Janna R Lanza; John H Leamon; Steven M Lefkowitz; Ming Lei; Jing Li; Kenton L Lohman; Hong Lu; Vinod B Makhijani; Keith E McDade; Michael P McKenna; Eugene W Myers; Elizabeth Nickerson; John R Nobile; Ramona Plant; Bernard P Puc; Michael T Ronan; George T Roth; Gary J Sarkis; Jan Fredrik Simons; John W Simpson; Maithreyan Srinivasan; Karrie R Tartaro; Alexander Tomasz; Kari A Vogt; Greg A Volkmer; Shally H Wang; Yong Wang; Michael P Weiner; Pengguang Yu; Richard F Begley; Jonathan M Rothberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Chapuis; Arnaud Estoup
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects.

Authors:  Emese Meglécz; Caroline Costedoat; Vincent Dubut; André Gilles; Thibaut Malausa; Nicolas Pech; Jean-François Martin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping.

Authors:  M J Brownstein; J D Carpten; J R Smith
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.993

7.  Strong genetic structure over the American continents and transoceanic dispersal in the mangrove genus Rhizophora (Rhizophoraceae) revealed by broad-scale nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis.

Authors:  Koji Takayama; Mariko Tamura; Yoichi Tateishi; Edward L Webb; Tadashi Kajita
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Gene flow and population subdivision in a pantropical plant with sea-drifted seeds Hibiscus tiliaceus and its allied species: evidence from microsatellite analyses.

Authors:  Koji Takayama; Yoichi Tateishi; Jin Murata; Tadashi Kajita
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 6.185

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.