Weilan Wu1,2, Xuguang Feng2, Ye Yuan2, Ying Liu2,3, Meiyu Li2,3, Jianguo Bin2, Yunbin Xiao2, Wangjun Liao4, Yulin Liao2, Wenzhu Zhang5, Jianping Bin6. 1. Department of Cardiology, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China. 2. StateKey Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, China. 3. Department of Cardiology, Guangzhou Eight People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 5. Department of Cardiology, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China. 18922238031@189.cn. 6. StateKey Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, China. jianpingbin@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ultrasound molecular imaging (UMI) has potential to evaluate an inflammatory profile of endothelium. However, it is less successful in large arteries. This study compared magnetic microbubbles (MBs) selectively targeted to endothelial P-selectin and dual-targeting MBs in vitro and in vivo. PROCEDURES: MBs were modified with P-selectin antibody (MBPM) or isotype control antibody (MBCM) via a magnetic streptavidin bridge, and MBs were conjugated to P-selectin antibody (MBP) or both P-selectin antibody and PAA-sialyl Lewisx (MBD) via regular streptavidin linker. Adherence of MBs was determined by using a parallel plate flow chamber at variable shear stress (0.5-24 dyn/cm2). Adhesive and magnetic behaviors of MBs were analyzed at 4.0 dyn/cm2 or at a flow rate of 50 mm/s. Attachment of MBs to P-selectin was determined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) imaging of murine abdominal aorta inflammation. The expression of P-selectin was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The adhesive efficacy of MBD was greater than MBP and MBCM, but lower than MBPM under all shear stress conditions (P < 0.05). The behaviors of fast-binding and rolling slow down were noted in MBD and MBPM; meanwhile, magnetic shifting of MBs centerline was presented in MBPM. Contrast video intensity (VI) from adhered MBPM to P-selectin of the inflammatory aorta was significantly higher than those from MBD and MBP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MBPM may be a better molecular probe than MBD for detection of P-selectin on aorta with CEU, likely due to the shifting of axial distribution. Thus, it may improve the detection of the inflammatory profile on large arteries by UMI.
PURPOSE: Ultrasound molecular imaging (UMI) has potential to evaluate an inflammatory profile of endothelium. However, it is less successful in large arteries. This study compared magnetic microbubbles (MBs) selectively targeted to endothelial P-selectin and dual-targeting MBs in vitro and in vivo. PROCEDURES: MBs were modified with P-selectin antibody (MBPM) or isotype control antibody (MBCM) via a magnetic streptavidin bridge, and MBs were conjugated to P-selectin antibody (MBP) or both P-selectin antibody and PAA-sialyl Lewisx (MBD) via regular streptavidin linker. Adherence of MBs was determined by using a parallel plate flow chamber at variable shear stress (0.5-24 dyn/cm2). Adhesive and magnetic behaviors of MBs were analyzed at 4.0 dyn/cm2 or at a flow rate of 50 mm/s. Attachment of MBs to P-selectin was determined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) imaging of murineabdominal aorta inflammation. The expression of P-selectin was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The adhesive efficacy of MBD was greater than MBP and MBCM, but lower than MBPM under all shear stress conditions (P < 0.05). The behaviors of fast-binding and rolling slow down were noted in MBD and MBPM; meanwhile, magnetic shifting of MBs centerline was presented in MBPM. Contrast video intensity (VI) from adhered MBPM to P-selectin of the inflammatory aorta was significantly higher than those from MBD and MBP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MBPM may be a better molecular probe than MBD for detection of P-selectin on aorta with CEU, likely due to the shifting of axial distribution. Thus, it may improve the detection of the inflammatory profile on large arteries by UMI.
Authors: Gregory E R Weller; Flordeliza S Villanueva; Alexander L Klibanov; William R Wagner Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: A L Klibanov; J J Rychak; W C Yang; S Alikhani; B Li; S Acton; J R Lindner; K Ley; S Kaul Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Beat A Kaufmann; John M Sanders; Christopher Davis; Aris Xie; Patrick Aldred; Ian J Sarembock; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-06-25 Impact factor: 29.690