Literature DB >> 27671641

Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production.

Rima Janusziewicz1, John R Tumbleston2, Adam L Quintanilla3, Sue J Mecham1, Joseph M DeSimone4.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing popularity of 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing (AM), the technique has not developed beyond the realm of rapid prototyping. This confinement of the field can be attributed to the inherent flaws of layer-by-layer printing and, in particular, anisotropic mechanical properties that depend on print direction, visible by the staircasing surface finish effect. Continuous liquid interface production (CLIP) is an alternative approach to AM that capitalizes on the fundamental principle of oxygen-inhibited photopolymerization to generate a continual liquid interface of uncured resin between the growing part and the exposure window. This interface eliminates the necessity of an iterative layer-by-layer process, allowing for continuous production. Herein we report the advantages of continuous production, specifically the fabrication of layerless parts. These advantages enable the fabrication of large overhangs without the use of supports, reduction of the staircasing effect without compromising fabrication time, and isotropic mechanical properties. Combined, these advantages result in multiple indicators of layerless and monolithic fabrication using CLIP technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; additive manufacturing; continuous liquid interface production; isotropic properties; stereolithogaphy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27671641      PMCID: PMC5081641          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605271113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Ferry P W Melchels; Jan Feijen; Dirk W Grijpma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  The origins and the future of microfluidics.

Authors:  George M Whitesides
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Strategies to reduce oxygen inhibition in photoinduced polymerization.

Authors:  Samuel Clark Ligon; Branislav Husár; Harald Wutzel; Richard Holman; Robert Liska
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes.

Authors:  Sanna M Peltola; Ferry P W Melchels; Dirk W Grijpma; Minna Kellomäki
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.709

5.  3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated versatile and reusable electrodes.

Authors:  Jayda L Erkal; Asmira Selimovic; Bethany C Gross; Sarah Y Lockwood; Eric L Walton; Stephen McNamara; R Scott Martin; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Advances in three-dimensional rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices for biological applications.

Authors:  P F O'Neill; A Ben Azouz; M Vázquez; J Liu; S Marczak; Z Slouka; H C Chang; D Diamond; D Brabazon
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Additive manufacturing. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects.

Authors:  John R Tumbleston; David Shirvanyants; Nikita Ermoshkin; Rima Janusziewicz; Ashley R Johnson; David Kelly; Kai Chen; Robert Pinschmidt; Jason P Rolland; Alexander Ermoshkin; Edward T Samulski; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites.

Authors:  Essam S Shawkat; Adrian C Shortall; Owen Addison; William M Palin
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.304

  8 in total
  21 in total

1.  Novel materials.

Authors:  John A Rogers; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Samuel Clark Ligon; Robert Liska; Jürgen Stampfl; Matthias Gurr; Rolf Mülhaupt
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Design and Characterization of a Novel Series of Geometrically Complex Intravaginal Rings with Digital Light Synthesis.

Authors:  Rima Janusziewicz; Sue J Mecham; Kevin R Olson; S Rahima Benhabbour
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 4.  Photopolymerizable Biomaterials and Light-Based 3D Printing Strategies for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Claire Yu; Jacob Schimelman; Pengrui Wang; Kathleen L Miller; Xuanyi Ma; Shangting You; Jiaao Guan; Bingjie Sun; Wei Zhu; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  A Review of Multi-Material 3D Printing of Functional Materials via Vat Photopolymerization.

Authors:  Usman Shaukat; Elisabeth Rossegger; Sandra Schlögl
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Characterization of a 30 µm pixel size CLIP-based 3D printer and its enhancement through dynamic printing optimization.

Authors:  Brian J Lee; Kaiwen Hsiao; Gabriel Lipkowitz; Tim Samuelsen; Lee Tate; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  Addit Manuf       Date:  2022-04-01

7.  3D printed drug-loaded implantable devices for intraoperative treatment of cancer.

Authors:  C Tilden Hagan; Cameron Bloomquist; Samuel Warner; Nicole M Knape; Isaiah Kim; Hayley Foley; Kyle T Wagner; Sue Mecham; Joseph DeSimone; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 11.467

8.  Scalable 3D-printed lattices for pressure control in fluid applications.

Authors:  Ian R Woodward; Lucas M Attia; Premal Patel; Catherine A Fromen
Journal:  AIChE J       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.167

9.  Photo-tunable hydrogel mechanical heterogeneity informed by predictive transport kinetics model.

Authors:  Callie I Higgins; Jason P Killgore; Frank W DelRio; Stephanie J Bryant; Robert R McLeod
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.679

10.  Rapid, large-volume, thermally controlled 3D printing using a mobile liquid interface.

Authors:  David A Walker; James L Hedrick; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.