Literature DB >> 27671002

A six-CpG panel with DNA methylation biomarkers predicting treatment response of chemoradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Wei-Lun Chang1, Wu-Wei Lai2, I-Ying Kuo3, Chien-Yu Lin4, Pei-Jung Lu5, Bor-Shyang Sheu6,7, Yi-Ching Wang8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients remains poor, and the chemoradiotherapy (CRT) applied to ESCC patients often failed. Therefore, development of biomarkers to predict CRT response is immensely important for choosing the best treatment strategy of an individual patient.
METHODS: The methylation array and pyrosequencing methylation assay were performed in pre-treatment endoscopic biopsies to identify probes with differential CpG methylation levels between good and poor CRT responders in a cohort of 12 ESCC patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to build the risk score equation of selected CpG probes in another cohort of 91 ESCC patients to predict CRT response. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate progression-free survival or time-to-progression of patients predicted with good and poor CRT responses.
RESULTS: Nine differentially methylated CpG probes were identified to be associated with CRT response. A risk score equation comprising six CpG probes located in IFNGR2, KCNK4, NOTCH4, NPY, PAX6, and SOX17 genes were built. The risk score was derived from the sum of each probe multiplied by its corresponding coefficient. Such a risk score has a good prediction performance in discriminating poor CRT responders from good responders (AUC: 0.930). Moreover, poor CRT responders predicted by risk score significantly had poorer prognosis in terms of shorter progression-free survival and time-to-progression (p = 0.004-0.008).
CONCLUSION: We established a proof-of-concept CRT response prediction panel consisting of six-CpG methylation biomarkers in identifying ESCC patients who are at high risk of CRT failure and need intensive care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy; CpG methylation biomarker; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27671002     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-016-1265-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  43 in total

1.  Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Michael Stahl; Martin Stuschke; Nils Lehmann; Hans-Joachim Meyer; Martin K Walz; Siegfried Seeber; Bodo Klump; Wilfried Budach; Reinhard Teichmann; Marcus Schmitt; Gerd Schmitt; Claus Franke; Hansjochen Wilke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, chromatin formation and gene expression in cancer.

Authors:  S B Baylin; M Esteller; M R Rountree; K E Bachman; K Schuebel; J G Herman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Tumor length assessed by miniprobe endosonography can predict the survival of the advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with stricture receiving concurrent chemoradiation.

Authors:  W-L Chang; F-C Lin; C-J Yen; H Cheng; W-W Lai; H-B Yang; B-S Sheu
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Transmembrane helix straightening and buckling underlies activation of mechanosensitive and thermosensitive K(2P) channels.

Authors:  Marco Lolicato; Paul M Riegelhaupt; Cristina Arrigoni; Kimberly A Clark; Daniel L Minor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Molecular physiology of pH-sensitive background K(2P) channels.

Authors:  Florian Lesage; Jacques Barhanin
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-12

Review 6.  Epigenetic mechanisms in tumorigenesis, tumor cell heterogeneity and drug resistance.

Authors:  Roel H Wilting; Jan-Hermen Dannenberg
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics in esophageal cancer chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Sakaeda; Motohiro Yamamori; Akiko Kuwahara; Kohshi Nishiguchi
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Identification of genes targeted by CpG island methylator phenotype in neuroblastomas, and their possible integrative involvement in poor prognosis.

Authors:  Masanobu Abe; Naoko Watanabe; Nathalie McDonell; Tsuyoshi Takato; Miki Ohira; Akira Nakagawara; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  High-throughput assessment of CpG site methylation for distinguishing between HCV-cirrhosis and HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kellie J Archer; Valeria R Mas; Daniel G Maluf; Robert A Fisher
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  Promoter hypermethylation in male breast cancer: analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Robert Kornegoor; Cathy B Moelans; Anoek Hj Verschuur-Maes; Marieke Ch Hogenes; Peter C de Bruin; Joost J Oudejans; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  5 in total

1.  SOX17-mediated MALAT1-miR-199a-HIF1α axis confers sensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yifei Yun; Yutong Zhang; Qiqi Xu; Yao Ou; Xifa Zhou; Zhonghua Lu
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Integrative analysis of genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic data identified molecular subtypes of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Mingyang Ma; Yang Chen; Xiaoyi Chong; Fangli Jiang; Jing Gao; Lin Shen; Cheng Zhang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Hypermethylation of the SEPT9 Gene Suggests Significantly Poor Prognosis in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Na Shen; Ting Wang; Delei Li; Yaowu Zhu; Huaping Xie; Yanjun Lu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  Transcriptomic biomarkers for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Anita Lavery; Richard C Turkington
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Development and validation of prognostic markers in sarcomas base on a multi-omics analysis.

Authors:  Yongchun Song; Kui Yang; Tuanhe Sun; Ruixiang Tang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.063

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.