Literature DB >> 27670868

Physiological and psychological responses of humans to the index of greenness of an interior space.

Ji-Young Choi1, Sin-Ae Park2, Soo-Jin Jung1, Ji-Young Lee1, Ki-Cheol Son3, Youn-Joo An4, Sang-Woo Lee5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the optimal index of greenness in terms of psychophysiological responses and subjective preference. We recruited 103 adult (51 male, 52 female) participants, who were examined individually in an interior space (lab) setting at Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea. Participants observed plants in the space for 3min per experimental index of greenness (5%, 20%, 50%, and 80%). During this period, heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalographic (EEG) physiological responses were measured, and the participant's preference for index of greenness and subjective index of greenness was determined via surveys. HRV values were normal, and not significantly different, except that male participants showed higher mean variability between cardiac NN intervals and greater autonomic activity than female participants (P<0.05). EEG data were not significantly different, except that female participants had a significantly higher mean amplitude at the left occipital (O1) electrode than male participants (P<0.01). Subjectively, participants preferred the 50% index of greenness the most, though they consistently reported the subjective index of greenness to be ∼15% higher than the actual level. We conclude that given a limited interior space, even a small amount of greenery may exert a relaxing effect on people.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electroencephalography; Green space; Heart rate variability; Horticultural therapy; Socio horticulture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27670868     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  8 in total

1.  Sitting or Walking? Analyzing the Neural Emotional Indicators of Urban Green Space Behavior with Mobile EEG.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Qibing Chen; Mingyan Jiang; Jinying Tao; Zongfang Liu; Xiaoxia Zhang; Linjia Wu; Shan Xu; Yushan Kang; Qiuyuan Zeng
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 2.  Nature and Mindfulness to Cope with Work-Related Stress: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Elisa Menardo; Donatella Di Marco; Sara Ramos; Margherita Brondino; Alicia Arenas; Patricia Costa; Carlos Vaz de Carvalho; Margherita Pasini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Correlation between Indoor Environmental Data and Biometric Parameters for the Impact Assessment of a Living Wall in a ZEB Lab.

Authors:  Francesco Salamone; Benedetta Barozzi; Ludovico Danza; Matteo Ghellere; Italo Meroni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  The effect of horticultural therapy on depressive symptoms among the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ya Wei Zhang; Jun Wang; Tian Hong Fang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24

5.  Can Even a Small Amount of Greenery Be Helpful in Reducing Stress? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiaqi Gu; Haixiao Liu; Hong Lu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Analysis of changes in geographical factors affecting sales in commercial alleys after COVID-19 using machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Lee Kangjae
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  Psychophysiological Response According to the Greenness Index of Subway Station Space.

Authors:  Won-Ji Kim; Tae-Kyung Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Residential Greenness and Birthweight in the State of Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Kelvin C Fong; Itai Kloog; Brent A Coull; Petros Koutrakis; Francine Laden; Joel D Schwartz; Peter James
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.