STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective audit. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the proportion of patients with cervical spinal cord injury who would potentially benefit from nerve transfer surgery to gain active hand opening, and to determine when a safe nerve transfer decision can be made. SETTING: Christchurch, New Zealand. METHODS: Case note review of the first 12 months following acute cervical spinal cord injury (2007-2012). Neurological assessment at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 1 year following injury. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had complete assessments and showed changes in the level of injury and severity of neurological injury between assessments. Forty-two percent of patients had motor complete C5-7 level injuries 12 weeks following injury and would benefit from consideration for nerve transfer to improve hand opening. Fewer (26%) would benefit 1 year following injury owing to a change in the neurological level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week neurological assessment identifies patients who may benefit from nerve transfer surgery. This enables referral for comprehensive upper limb assessment and reassessment of motor function to determine suitability for surgical intervention. Nerve transfer within the window of opportunity provides active hand opening for patients following cervical spinal cord injury.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective audit. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the proportion of patients with cervical spinal cord injury who would potentially benefit from nerve transfer surgery to gain active hand opening, and to determine when a safe nerve transfer decision can be made. SETTING: Christchurch, New Zealand. METHODS: Case note review of the first 12 months following acute cervical spinal cord injury (2007-2012). Neurological assessment at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 1 year following injury. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had complete assessments and showed changes in the level of injury and severity of neurological injury between assessments. Forty-two percent of patients had motor complete C5-7 level injuries 12 weeks following injury and would benefit from consideration for nerve transfer to improve hand opening. Fewer (26%) would benefit 1 year following injury owing to a change in the neurological level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week neurological assessment identifies patients who may benefit from nerve transfer surgery. This enables referral for comprehensive upper limb assessment and reassessment of motor function to determine suitability for surgical intervention. Nerve transfer within the window of opportunity provides active hand opening for patients following cervical spinal cord injury.
Authors: Alastair G Rothwell; K Anne Sinnott; Khalid D Mohammed; Jennifer A Dunn; Stewart W Sinclair Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Natasha van Zyl; Jodie B Hahn; Catherine A Cooper; Michael D Weymouth; Stephen J Flood; Mary P Galea Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Jayme A Bertelli; Cristiano P Tacca; Marcos F Ghizoni; Paulo Roberto Kechele; Marcos Antonio Santos Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: C Schuld; S Franz; H J A van Hedel; J Moosburger; D Maier; R Abel; H van de Meent; A Curt; N Weidner; R Rupp Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Ida K Fox; Kristen M Davidge; Christine B Novak; Gwendolyn Hoben; Lorna C Kahn; Neringa Juknis; Rimma Ruvinskaya; Susan E Mackinnon Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2015-03