Literature DB >> 27670672

Identification of LATE BLOOMER2 as a CYCLING DOF FACTOR Homolog Reveals Conserved and Divergent Features of the Flowering Response to Photoperiod in Pea.

Stephen Ridge1, Frances C Sussmilch1, Valérie Hecht1, Jacqueline K Vander Schoor1, Robyn Lee2, Gregoire Aubert3, Judith Burstin3, Richard C Macknight2, James L Weller4.   

Abstract

The molecular pathways responsible for the flowering response to photoperiod have been extensively studied in Arabidopsis thaliana and cereals but remain poorly understood in other major plant groups. Here, we describe a dominant mutant at the LATE BLOOMER2 (LATE2) locus in pea (Pisum sativum) that is late-flowering with a reduced response to photoperiod. LATE2 acts downstream of light signaling and the circadian clock to control expression of the main photoperiod-regulated FT gene, FTb2, implying that it plays a primary role in photoperiod measurement. Mapping identified the CYCLING DOF FACTOR gene CDFc1 as a strong candidate for LATE2, and the late2-1D mutant was found to carry a missense mutation in CDFc1 that impairs its capacity to bind to the blue-light photoreceptor FKF1 in yeast two-hybrid assays and delays flowering in Arabidopsis when overexpressed. Arabidopsis CDF genes are important negative regulators of CONSTANS (CO) transcription, but we found no effect of LATE2 on the transcription of pea CO-LIKE genes, nor on genes in any other families previously implicated in the activation of FT in Arabidopsis. Our results reveal an important component of the pea photoperiod response pathway and support the view that regulation of FTb2 expression by photoperiod occurs via a CO-independent mechanism.
© 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27670672      PMCID: PMC5134971          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.15.01011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  77 in total

1.  Interaction of phytochromes A and B in the control of de-etiolation and flowering in pea.

Authors:  J L Weller; N Beauchamp; L H Kerckhoffs; J D Platten; J B Reid
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  The flowering time regulator CONSTANS is recruited to the FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter via a unique cis-element.

Authors:  Shiv B Tiwari; Yu Shen; Han-Chang Chang; Yanli Hou; Amanda Harris; Siu Fong Ma; Megan McPartland; Graham J Hymus; Luc Adam; Colleen Marion; Alemu Belachew; Peter P Repetti; T Lynne Reuber; Oliver J Ratcliffe
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  P Suárez-López; K Wheatley; F Robson; H Onouchi; F Valverde; G Coupland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice.

Authors:  Weiya Xue; Yongzhong Xing; Xiaoyu Weng; Yu Zhao; Weijiang Tang; Lei Wang; Hongju Zhou; Sibin Yu; Caiguo Xu; Xianghua Li; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-05-04       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  HvVRN2 responds to daylength, whereas HvVRN1 is regulated by vernalization and developmental status.

Authors:  Ben Trevaskis; Megan N Hemming; W James Peacock; Elizabeth S Dennis
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybean.

Authors:  Fanjiang Kong; Baohui Liu; Zhengjun Xia; Shusei Sato; Bo Min Kim; Satoshi Watanabe; Tetsuya Yamada; Satoshi Tabata; Akira Kanazawa; Kyuya Harada; Jun Abe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  FKF1, a clock-controlled gene that regulates the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  D C Nelson; J Lasswell; L E Rogg; M A Cohen; B Bartel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Molecular control of flowering in response to day length in rice.

Authors:  Vittoria Brambilla; Fabio Fornara
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 7.061

Review 9.  Adaptation to the local environment by modifications of the photoperiod response in crops.

Authors:  Norihito Nakamichi
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.927

10.  The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote.

Authors:  Yang Liao; Gordon K Smyth; Wei Shi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  CYCLING DOF FACTOR 1 represses transcription through the TOPLESS co-repressor to control photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Greg S Goralogia; Tong-Kun Liu; Lin Zhao; Paul M Panipinto; Evan D Groover; Yashkarn S Bains; Takato Imaizumi
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  EARLY FLOWERING3 Redundancy Fine-Tunes Photoperiod Sensitivity.

Authors:  Andrew J S Rubenach; Valérie Hecht; Jacqueline K Vander Schoor; Lim Chee Liew; Gregoire Aubert; Judith Burstin; James L Weller
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  The CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE Module of the Mediator Complex Promotes Flowering and Reproductive Development in Pea.

Authors:  A S M Mainul Hasan; Jacqueline K Vander Schoor; Valerie Hecht; James L Weller
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Fragaria vesca CONSTANS controls photoperiodic flowering and vegetative development.

Authors:  Takeshi Kurokura; Samia Samad; Elli Koskela; Katriina Mouhu; Timo Hytönen
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  The transcriptomic response to a short day to long day shift in leaves of the reference legume Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Geoffrey Thomson; James Taylor; Joanna Putterill
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Overexpression of Medicago MtCDFd1_1 Causes Delayed Flowering in Medicago via Repression of MtFTa1 but Not MtCO-Like Genes.

Authors:  Lulu Zhang; Andrew Jiang; Geoffrey Thomson; Megan Kerr-Phillips; Chau Phan; Thorben Krueger; Mauren Jaudal; Jiangqi Wen; Kirankumar S Mysore; Joanna Putterill
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Evolutionary Insight into the Clock-Associated PRR5 Transcriptional Network of Flowering Plants.

Authors:  Yosuke Toda; Toru Kudo; Toshinori Kinoshita; Norihito Nakamichi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Candidate Photoperiod Gene MtFE Promotes Growth and Flowering in Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Geoffrey Thomson; Lulu Zhang; Jiangqi Wen; Kirankumar S Mysore; Joanna Putterill
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Plant clock modifications for adapting flowering time to local environments.

Authors:  Akari E Maeda; Norihito Nakamichi
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 8.005

10.  Medicago PHYA promotes flowering, primary stem elongation and expression of flowering time genes in long days.

Authors:  Mauren Jaudal; Jiangqi Wen; Kirankumar S Mysore; Joanna Putterill
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 4.215

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.