| Literature DB >> 27670293 |
Yin Yang1,2, Yeming Yang1,3,4,5, Lulin Huang1,3, Yaru Zhai1, Jie Li2, Zhilin Jiang1,3, Bo Gong1,3, Hao Fang1,3, Ramasamy Kim6, Zhenglin Yang1,3,5, Periasamy Sundaresan7, Xianjun Zhu1,3,4,5,8, Yu Zhou1,3,5,8.
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a leading cause of inherited blindness characterized by progressive degeneration of the retinal photoreceptor cells. This study aims to identify genetic mutations in a Chinese family RP-2236, an Indian family RP-IC-90 and 100 sporadic Indian individuals with autosomal recessive RP (arRP). Whole exome sequencing was performed on the index patients of RP-2236, RP-IC-90 and all of the 100 sporadic Indian patients. Direct Sanger sequencing was used to validate the mutations identified. Four novel mutations and one reported mutation in the crumbs homolog 1 (CRB1) gene, which has been known to cause severe retinal dystrophies, were identified. A novel homozygous splicing mutation c.2129-1G>C was found in the three patients In family RP-2236. A homozygous point mutation p.R664C was found in RP-IC-90. A novel homozygous mutation p.G1310C was identified in patient I-44, while novel compound heterozygous mutations p.N629D and p.A593T were found in patient I-7. All mutations described above were not present in the 1000 normal controls. In conclusion, we identified four novel mutations in CRB1 in a cohort of RP patients from the Chinese and Indian populations. Our data enlarges the CRB1 mutation spectrums and may provide new target loci for RP diagnose and treatment.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27670293 PMCID: PMC5037368 DOI: 10.1038/srep33681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical information of members in the Chinese family RP-2236.
| Family Member | Age | Gender | Relation–ship | Clinical Information | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease onset(years old) | Visual Acuity(OD/OS) | Fundusexamination | mfERG | FFA | ||||
| III1 | 46 | M | Father | / | 1.2/1.2 | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| III2 | 43 | F | Mother | / | 1.0/1.0 | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| III3 | 48 | M | Mother | / | 1.2/1.0 | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| III4 | 45 | F | Father | / | 1.0/1.2 | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| IV:1 | 22 | F | Daughter | / | 1.2/1.2 | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| IV:2 | 18 | F | Daughter | 2 | 0.05/0.05 | Loss of pigment epithelium | Weak response | Extensive transmitted and blocked fluorescence |
| IV:3 | 16 | M | Son | 1 | 0.05/0.05 | Loss of pigment epithelium | Weak response | Extensive transmitted and blocked fluorescence |
| IV:4 | 19 | F | Daughter | 1.5 | 0.05/0.05 | Loss of pigment epithelium | Weak response | Extensive transmitted and blocked fluorescence |
M, male; F, female; /, no eye disease; FFA, fundus fluorescein angiography; mfERG, multifocal electroretinography.
Figure 1Pedigrees of the Chinese and Indian family with arRP.
Arrow indicated the proband patient IV:2 in the Chinese family of RP-2236 (A) and the proband patient II:1 in the Indian family of RP-IC-90 (B). Solid symbol indicated affected individual while open symbols indicated unaffected individuals.
Figure 2Representative clinical features of patient IV:2 in the Chinese family RP-2236.
(A) Fundus photographs showed the loss of pigment epithelial with narrowed arterioles, pale optic disk and irregular pigment clumps with both peripheral retina and macula involved in both eyes. (B) FFA images showed extensive transmitted and blocked fluorescence due to loss of pigment epithelium with scattered pigment clumps. (C) mfERG records showed weak response under neither scotopic nor photopic condition, especially at the peripheral retina.
Number of candidate SNP/Indels in patient IV:2 of the consanguineous Chinese family RP-2236 and patient II:1 of the Indian family RP-IC-90 filtered against several public variation databases and the in-house data.
| Feature_SNPs and Indels inpatient IV:2 of family RP-2236 | Feature_SNPs and Indels inpatient II:1 of family RP-IC-90 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total_SNPs/Indels | 65170/8305 | 66320/7901 |
| Functional_SNP/Indels | 366/120 | 387/109 |
| Filtered_known gene | 60 | 42 |
| Filtered_DBsnp137common/indel;Filtered_DBsnp/indel_1000gene(2011); MAF <0.05 | 5 | 3 |
| Filtered in House Data | 3 | 2 |
| homozygous | 1 | 1 |
| Filtered synonymous mutation | 1 | 1 |
Genotypes of the family members and the sporadic patients.
| Phenotype | Nucleotide change | Effect | Genotype | SIFT, Polyphen2 | Original reports described | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family RP-2236 | III1 | / | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | heterozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A |
| III2 | / | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | heterozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A | |
| III3 | / | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | heterozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A | |
| III4 | / | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | heterozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A | |
| IV:1 | / | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | heterozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A | |
| IV:2 | RP | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | homozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A | |
| IV:3 | RP | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | homozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A | |
| IV:4 | RP | c.2129-1G>C | Splicing | homozygous | N/A, N/A | N/A | |
| Family RP-IC-90 | I:1 | / | c.C2290T | p.R764C | heterozygous | Damaging, Probably damaging | den Hollander AI |
| I:2 | / | c.C2290T | p.R764C | heterozygous | Damaging, Probably damaging | den Hollander AI | |
| II:1 | RP | c.C2290T | p.R764C | homozygous | Damaging, Probably damaging | den Hollander AI | |
| Sporadic patients | I-44 | RP | c.G3928T | p.G1310C | homozygous | Damaging, Probably damaging | N/A |
| I-7 | RP | c.A1885G | p.N629D | heterozygous | Damaging, Probably damaging | N/A | |
| c.G1777A | p.A593T | heterozygous | Damaging, Probably damaging | N/A |
/, no eye disease; N/A, Not available.
Figure 3Mutation identification of CRB1 gene in the Chinese family and the Indian family and the sporadic Indian patients with arRP.
(A) Validation of the CRB1 gene in the family RP-2236. Patients (IV:2, IV:3 and IV:4) harbored the homozygous splicing mutation c.2129-1G>C of the CRB1 gene. The parents (III:1, III:2, III:3, III:4) and the healthy daughter (IV:1) were all unaffected carriers with the heterozygous c.2129-1G>C splicing mutation. (B) Validation of the CRB1 gene in the family RP-IC-90. Patient II:1 harbored the homozygous point mutation p.R764C of the CRB1 gene. The parents (I:1 and I:2) were unaffected carriers with the heterozygous p.R764C mutation. (C) Validation of the CRB1 gene in the sporadic Indian patents. The patient I-44 harbored the homozygous mutation p.G1310C while the patient I-7 harbored the compound heterozygous mutations p.N629D and p.A593T.
Figure 4Schematic representation of the crumbs homolog 1 gene structure.
The red arrow indicated the mutations reported in our study. The homozygous splicing mutation c.2129-1G>C in the CRB1 gene damaged the second laminin AG-like domain which located in the exon 7; The reported mutation p.R764C located in the exon 9 and damaged the third laminin AG-like domain; The mutation of p.G1310C located in the exon 11 and affected the function of the C-type lectin domain. The compound heterozygous mutation p.N629D and p.A593T both located in the exon 6 and affected the function of the first laminin AG-like domain.