Literature DB >> 27669904

Identification and molecular characterization of bacteriophage phiAxp-2 of Achromobacter xylosoxidans.

Erna Li1, Zhe Yin2, Yanyan Ma3, Huan Li4, Weishi Lin4, Xiao Wei4, Ruixiang Zhao3, Aimin Jiang1, Jing Yuan4, Xiangna Zhao4.   

Abstract

A novel Achromobacter xylosoxidans bacteriophage, phiAxp-2, was isolated from hospital sewage in China. The phage was morphologically and microbiologically characterized, and its one-step growth curve, host range, genomic sequence, and receptor were determined. Its morphology showed that phiAxp-2 belongs to the family Siphoviridae. Microbiological characterization demonstrated that pH 7 is most suitable for phage phiAxp-2; its titer decreased when the temperature exceeded 50 °C; phiAxp-2 is sensitive to ethanol and isopropanol; and the presence of calcium and magnesium ions is necessary to accelerate cell lysis and improve the formation of phiAxp-2 plaques. Genomic sequencing and a bioinformatic analysis showed that phage phiAxp-2 is a novel bacteriophage, consisting of a circular, double-stranded 62,220-bp DNA molecule with a GC content of 60.11% that encodes 86 putative open reading frames (ORFs). The lipopolysaccharide of A. xylosoxidans is involved in the adsorption of phiAxp-2.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27669904      PMCID: PMC5037462          DOI: 10.1038/srep34300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Achromobacter xylosoxidans is an nonfermenting Gram-negative bacillus1. It is an uncommon opportunistic pathogen with low virulence, but can potentially cause invasive infections in immunocompromised patients, such as those with meningitis, empyema, pulmonary abscess, peritonitis, urinary tract infection, prosthetic valve endocarditis, chronic otitis media, keratitis, osteomyelitis, endophthalmitis, or septic arthritis1. A. xylosoxidans is frequently associated with antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections. Bacteriophage therapy directed against A. xylosoxidans may be useful in combating these infections. Bacteriophages are potential therapeutic agents in the treatment of bacterial infections and useful diagnostic tools2, and since their discovery, attempts have been made to use bacteriophages to treat several infectious diseases3. Therefore, new phages are being isolated and characterized4. Because A. xylosoxidans infections are some of the most problematic nosocomial infections, the isolation and characterization of novel phages that infect this species is a priority. Many of these phages have been isolated in recent years, but only some have been fully sequenced and described in detail5. To develop an effective antimicrobial agent, we isolated a bacteriophage, designated phiAxp-2, from hospital sewage and described its morphology, host range, growth characteristics, whole genome sequence, and receptor usage. This phage may be an effective tool for the control of A. xylosoxidans infections in susceptible populations.

Results and Discussion

Phage morphology

Bacteriophage phiAxp-2 was isolated from A. xylosoxidans strain A22732 and observed with electron microscopy. A. xylosoxidans strain A22732 harbours a conjugative imipenem-encoding plasmid and is resistant to multiple β -lactam antibiotics, including imipenem and meropenem6.Cell lysis was observed after induction (phage yield: 1 × 109 pfu/ml), by propagating the induced lysate on strain A22732. The plaques obtained had a clear pinpoint morphology, with well-defined boundaries (Fig. 1a). Electron micrographs of negatively stained phiAxp-2 virions showed an icosahedral head and a long noncontractile tail (Fig. 1b). The average particle had a capsid of approximately 56 nm in diameter and a tail length of approximately 230 nm, and the phage is therefore morphologically similar to phages in the order Caudovirales and family Siphoviridae. Host range tests suggested that among all the species tested (n = 14), phiAxp-2 was specifically virulent to only four strains of A. xylosoxidans (Table 1). Besides the reported multidrug-resistant strain A22732, the other three clinical A. xylosoxidans strains were shown to be resistant to aztreonam and tobramycin6.
Figure 1

(a) Morphology of phiAxp-2 plaques. Phages were plated in Luria–Bertani agar and overlain with a liquid culture of A. xylosoxidans A22732. The plates were incubated at 37 °C. Clear, well-defined phiAxp-2 plaques were observed and photographed after 18 h. (b) Phage morphology. Phage was stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid and visualized at 120,000-fold magnification with transmission electron microscopy. Scale bars represent 100 nm. (c) One-step growth curve of the bacteriophage. The phage was grown in an exponential-phase culture of A. xylosoxidans strain A22732. Shown are the pfu per infected cell in the cultures at different time points. Each data point is the mean of three experiments.

Table 1

Host range analysis of the phage phiAxp-2 −, absent; +, present.

SpeciesIDInfection
Achromobacter xylosoxidansA22732+
A. xylosoxidans5271+
A. xylosoxidans844+
A. xylosoxidans6065+
Escherichia coliATCC 25922
Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC BAA-1706
Serratia marcescenswk2050
Enterobacter aerogenes3-SP
Enterobacter cloacaeT5282
Leclercia adcarboxglataP10164
Raoultella ornithinolyticaYNKP001
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia9665
Citrobacter freundiiP10159
Vibrio parahaemolyticusJ5421
Pseudomonas aeruginosaPA01
Acinetobacter baumanniiN1
Shigella sonnei#1083

Latent period and burst size

There is a progressive relationship between burst size and the latent period, such that an optimal latent period leads to high phage fitness, and an increase in burst size may contribute to plaque size or larger plaques with higher burst sizes78. A one-step growth curve of phage phiAxp-2 propagated on A. xylosoxidans A22732 was constructed. The latent period of phage phiAxp-2 was 180 min. The burst time was approximately 240 min and the burst size was 2,985 pfu/cell (burst size = the total number of phages liberated at the end of one cycle of growth/number of infected bacteria) (Fig. 1c).

Microbiological characterization

Figure 2a shows the pH sensitivity of phage phiAxp-2. The phage maintained its infectivity when incubated at 37 °C in a pH range of 4–11. At pH 1 and pH 14, approximately 100% reductions in the phage particle counts were observed. The loss of viability when phage phiAxp-2 was subjected to various temperatures is shown in Fig. 2b. Phage phiAxp-2 displayed heat-sensitivity at 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C. Treatment at 80 °C for 75 min completely inactivated the phage. As shown in Fig. 2c,d, the activity of phage phiAxp-2 was affected by the presence of ethanol and isopropanol. The most effective concentrations of ethanol (95%, v/v) and isopropanol (95%, v/v) reduced the phage titer by 76% and 84%, respectively, after 90 min. Because many phages require divalent ions (such as Ca2+ or Mg2+) for optimal adsorption9, the ion-dependence of phage phiAxp-2 was determined. The most efficient infection was achieved with concentrations of 15 mM Mg2+ and 10 mM Ca2+ (Fig. 2e).
Figure 2

Resistance of phage phiAxp-2 to physical and chemical agents.

(a) Effect of pH on the phage phiAxp-2 titer after incubation for 60 min in LB broth at 37 °C. (b) Inactivation kinetics of phage phiAxp-2 at 4 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C. (c) Inactivation kinetics of phage phiAxp-2 in the presence of 10%, 50%, 75%, and 95% ethanol. (d) Inactivation kinetics of phage phiAxp-2 in the presence of 10%, 50%, and 95% isopropanol. (e) Viability of phage phiAxp-2 in LB broth with different Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations. On all graphs, the values are the means of three determinations.

Genome characterization

For the future application of phage phiAxp-2 to protect humans from A. xylosoxidans infections, the phage must be characterized in detail, including its genomic sequence. The genomic DNA of phiAxp-2 was extracted and purified, and its genome was completely sequenced and analyzed. Analysis of the sequence found that the restriction endonuclease HindIII had nine cutting sites in the genomic DNA. Thus, it was expected that when HindIII was used to digest the DNA, ten fragments would be generated if the DNA comprised a linear genome, but if the genome was circular, nine fragments would be generated. The HindIII digestion experiment generated nine fragments in the agarose gel (Fig. 3), revealing that the phiAxp-2 genome is a circular molecule. The complete circular double-stranded DNA genome of phage phiAxp-2 is 62,220 bp in length with a G+C content of 60.11%. This percentage is lower than those of the complete Achromobacter genomes sequenced so far (65–66% G+C content), but is higher than those of the sequenced A. xylosoxidans-specific phages, JWAlpha (KF787095) and JWDelta (KF787094), which are 54.4% and 54.2%, respectively5. Analysis of the phage phiAxp-2 genome revealed 86 putative open reading frames (ORFs). The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database was scanned for homologues of the proteins encoded by the predicted ORFs using BlastP. Because the genome of phiAxp-2 diverges from other available phage genomes, only a limited number (33%) of protein functions could be predicted with similarity searches, highlighting the novelty of this phage. Therefore, a more detailed investigation is required to fully understand the nature of this novel phage. Twenty-eight ORFs showed some similarity in the BlastP analysis. Putative functions were assigned to 22 ORFs based on these similarities. Despite the low number of annotated ORFs, different modules can be recognized in the phiAxp-2 genome, which encodes proteins for (i) DNA replication, regulation, and modification, (ii) DNA packaging, and (iii) head and tail morphogenesis (Fig. 4). All of these functional clusters are located in ORF1–ORF34, which constitutes approximately 60% of the whole genome length. The remaining ORFs showed less or no similarity to other proteins in the NCBI database.
Figure 3

Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of phiAxp-2 DNA.

Genomic DNA from phage phiAxp-2 was digested with the enzymes indicated (HindIII) and run on an agarose gel (0.7%). The length of fragments generated by digestion of the linear genome or the circular genome was showed on the right side of the electrophoresis map.

Figure 4

Genomic map of phiAxp-2.

The genomic map of phiAxp-2 was constructed with CLC Main Workbench, version 6.1.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). The bacteriophage phiAxp-2 genome is schematically presented with the predicted ORFs indicated by arrows; the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription.

The left half of the phiAxp-2 genome (ORF1–ORF29) has a similar genomic structure and encodes proteins most similar to each of the Burkholderia phage AH2 (JN564907) proteins from ORF78–ORF50 (the right half of the AH2 genome; excluding nine proteins) in the reverse transcription direction (Fig. 4 and Table 2). However, the range of overall similarity was as low as 29–57% at the amino acid level, and genomic comparisons with AH2 showed that in many instances, only small parts or domains of the ORFs were conserved. The most similar of these protein was the portal protein (57% identity with AH2 gp65) and the least similar was the decorator protein (24% identity with AH2 gp63) (Table 2). Phage AH2 is most closely related to Burkholderia phage BcepNazgul (NC005091)10, and a multiple genome alignment of the chromosomes of phiAxp-2, AH2, and BcepNazgul confirmed their relatedness (Fig. 5). Despite the similarities in their virion morphologies (the AH2 virion also has a noncontractile tail of approximately 220 nm and a capsid approximately 60 nm in diameter10), a phylogenetic analysis of the DNA polymerase and the terminase large subunit predicted that phiAxp-2 is most closely related to AH2 (Fig. 6a,b). Because the proteins of phiAxp-2 have largely uncharacterized functions, its genome must encode several new viral proteins. We predict that the large-scale genomic rearrangement in phiAxp-2 was mediated by transposase genes. However, we did not identify any transposase gene. Such genomic rearrangements may have caused the genomic diversity observed in the phages, resulting in the biological differences that distinguish them.
Table 2

Achromobacter phage phiAxp-2 gene annotations.

ORFsStrandStartEndLength (aa)aaa identity (%)Function
orf01444296684042DNA primase [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf023002330199
orf03+3451395716837hypothetical protein Nazgul22 [Burkholderia phage BcepNazgul]
orf04+40424437131
orf05+4453574543038exonuclease [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf06+5792643021235single-stranded DNA binding protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf07+6507860069743DNA polymerase [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf08+859788909738resolvase [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf09+89371048151445helicase [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf10+10528107376957hypothetical protein Q051_01461 [Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA046]
orf11+107271132619932terminase small subunit [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf12+113131340069454terminase large subunit [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf13+13400136518339head-tail joining protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf14+136821529253657portal protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf15+152961667545942prohead protease [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf16+167031708012529decorator protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf17+171081816335147major capsid protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf18+18233185239638hypothetical protein [Pseudomonas aeruginosa]
orf19+185501878377
orf20+187831920514032hypothetical protein AH2_00060 [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf21+192081983420855hypothetical protein AH2_00059 [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf22+198272042019734minor tail protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf23+204562125326550hypothetical protein AH2_00057 [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf24+212632175416331tail protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf25+21757219666943tail protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf26+2195026752160333tape measure protein [Bradyrhizobium sp. WSM3983]
orf27+2674930924138742tail sheath [Escherichia phage N4]
orf28+309273344683951capsid and scaffold protein [Delftia phage RG-2014]
orf29+334483429028031tail assembly protein [Burkholderia phage AH2]
orf30+343013442641
orf31+344143465379
orf32+346863487763
orf33+348743726179544tail assembly protein [Bradyrhizobium sp. WSM3983]
orf34+372583803425836virion associated protein [Xylella phage Salvo]
orf35+3804638780244
orf36+3885039266138
orf37+394243969991
orf38+3999640481161
orf39+405364074587
orf40+407294088752
orf414093441860308
orf42418574214796
orf434214942520123
orf44425104273173
orf45427284298284
orf46429794315859
orf474317943490103
orf484348043917145
orf49440304423367
orf504423044595121
orf514459845155185
orf524521645710164
orf534576446351195
orf54463534653861
orf554681647238140
orf564730247901199
orf57479034805249
orf58480524830985
orf594830948671120
orf60486744894690
orf614894349611222
orf62496084988993
orf634987651153425
orf64511795147297
orf65514745176496
orf665186052297145
orf67+527925300169
orf68+5307254028318
orf69+5404154736231
orf70+5476155336191
orf71+5533355644103
orf72+5585856799313
orf73+568025702980
orf74+570265714840
orf75+5715357476107
orf76+574815776293
orf77+5798858239109
orf78+582365846676
orf79+5848058920146
orf80+590045915350
orf81+591685929642
orf82+5930159789162
orf83+5980860353181
orf84+6035860711117
orf85+6072061406228
orf86+614656163857

aAmino acids.

Figure 5

Multiple genome alignment constructed with the Mauve software (http://asap.ahabs.wisc.edu/mauve/) and the chromosomes of related phages.

Similarity is represented by the heights of the bars, which correspond to the average level of conservation in that region of the genomic sequence. Completely white regions represent fragments that were not aligned or contained sequence elements specific to a particular genome. Boxes with identical colors represent local colinear blocks (LCB), indicating homologous DNA regions shared by two or more chromosomes without sequence rearrangements. LCBs indicated below the horizontal black line represent reverse complements of the reference LCB.

Figure 6

Phylogenetic tree based on DNA polymerases and the large terminase subunits of selected bacteriophages.

The DNA polymerases and large terminase subunits were compared using the ClustalW program, and the phylogenetic tree was generated with the neighbor-joining method and 1000 bootstrap replicates (CLC Genomics Workbench 6).

Module analysis

Genes for DNA replication and DNA metabolism occur at the beginning of the phiAxp-2 genome, followed by packaging genes and the structural genes. ORF1–9 encode proteins for DNA replication, regulation, and modification, and six of them encode proteins with homology to AH2 proteins (35–45% identity): DNA primase (ORF1), exonuclease (ORF5), single-stranded DNA binding protein (ORF6), DNA polymerase (ORF7), resolvase (ORF8), and helicase (ORF9). The DNA packaging genes (the terminase subunits, ORF11–ORF12) of phiAxp-2 both have counterparts in AH2. phiAxp-2 ORF11 codes a 199-amino-acid (199-aa) protein with limited similarity (32%) to the known small terminase subunit of phage AH2. A DUF1441 superfamily member was detected using BlastP-based tools, and appears to be distantly related to other helix–turn–helix DNA-binding motif families, so may also be involved in the recognition of viral DNA and the subsequent initiation of viral packaging11. The gene immediately downstream from ORF11 encodes a 695-aa protein with 54% identity to the large terminase subunit of AH2, which implies a similar function in DNA packaging. ORF12 is predicted to have a GpA (pfam05876) domain, which is actively involved in the late stages of packaging, including DNA translocation. ORF13–ORF17 make up the capsid morphogenesis module, containing genes encoding the head–tail joining protein (ORF13), portal protein (ORF14), prohead protease (ORF15), decorator protein (ORF16), and major capsid protein (ORF17). Each of these proteins is similar to an AH2 protein, with percentage identities of 29–57% (Table 2). Among these proteins, the portal protein is thought to form the hole through which DNA is packaged into the prohead, and is also a part of the packaging motor11. All the genes encoded by ORF20–25 have counterparts in AH2 (31–55% identity), and three were annotated as tail proteins: ORF22, ORF24, and ORF25. Like most tailed phages, phiAxp-2 encodes two tail proteins proximal to the tail tape measure gene12. The tape measure protein of phiAxp-2, encoded by ORF26, has no sequence similarity to that of AH2, although the two proteins have similar functions in the assembly of the phage tails and in tail length determination1213. phiAxp-2 ORF27 is distantly related to the Escherichia phage N4 tail sheath protein, which is known to interact with the N4 outer membrane receptor, NfrA14. phiAxp-2 ORF28 encodes a capsid and scaffold protein that is absent in AH2. The scaffold protein assists in the assembly of the outer shell and dissociates from the capsid during subsequent DNA packaging11. ORF29 encodes a tail assembly protein that has 31% amino acid identity with the AH2 tail assembly protein. ORF33 and ORF34 encode a tail assembly protein and a virion-associated protein, respectively. Neither is present in AH2. Following the structural components, there is a region encoding small and uncharacterized proteins, which spans about 24 kb. No genes similar to the genes for lysin or holin have yet been detected in the phiAxp-2 genome, which are responsible for host cell disruption during the burst steps of phages15, although the clearing of the bacterial culture at a specific time point strongly suggest that they exist.

Identification of the host receptor

The adsorption of the phage to the bacterial surface is the first and most important step in the phage infection process. Both the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and outer membrane proteins located on the surfaces of Gram-negative bacteria can be used as phage receptors. In the present study, protease K and periodate were used to destroy the A. xylosoxidans outer membrane proteins and LPS, respectively, to determine the attachment site for phage phiAxp-2 on the cell surface of A. xylosoxidans (Fig. 7a,b). Phage adsorption to LPS-deficient A. xylosoxidans cells was inhibited, indicating that phage-specific adhesion is mediated by LPS (Fig. 7b). These results were confirmed with a phage inactivation assay performed with pure LPS isolated from strain A22732. These experiments showed a direct correlation between the LPS concentration and the inhibition of viral particle infectivity (Fig. 7c), and approximately 12.5 μg/ml LPS inhibited the activity of 50% of 2.8 × 103 pfu phiAxp-2. LPS of E. coli 0111:B4 was used as the negative control and showed no phage-inactivating capacity compared with A. xylosoxidans LPS, indicating that A. xylosoxidans LPS is the specific receptor for phage phiAxp-2.
Figure 7

Effects of different treatments applied to the host bacterium on phiAxp-2 adsorption, which is shown as residual pfu percentages.

(a) Effect of proteinase K treatment on the adsorption of phiAxp-2 to A. xylosoxidans strain A22732. (b) Effect of periodate treatment on the adsorption of phiAxp-2 to A. xylosoxidans strain A22732. The controls (LB and “A22732+ acetate”), untreated (A22732), and treated groups (“A22732+ ProtK”, treated with proteinase K; “A22732+ IO4−”, treated with periodate) were tested for adsorption, as indicated on the x axes. Error bars denote statistical variations. Significance was determined with one-sample Student’s t test when the treated and untreated groups were compared. *P < 0.05. (c) Inactivation of phiAxp-2 by LPS derived from A. xylosoxidans A22732. Percentage infectivity was determined after incubation for 1 h at 37 °C. Error bars denote statistical variations.

Concluding remarks

In this study, we have characterized a Siphoviridae phage that infects the important nosocomial pathogen A. xylosoxidans. Genomic data are an important resource with which to study and engineer phages to control specific bacterial species15, and advances in phage genomic characterization have made phage therapy more feasible in terms of both its logistics and safety10. A combination of genomic sequencing and a morphological analysis showed that phiAxp-2 is a member of the family Siphoviridae, and is related to the previously sequenced phage AH2. The most striking feature to emerge from a comparative analysis of the phage genome was the extensive mosaic structure of phiAxp-2, which contains different segments with distinct evolutionary histories. The results of this comparative analysis indicate that the left half of the phiAxp-2 genome has a similar genomic structure to partial genomic sequences of AH2. A simple general explanation is that horizontal genetic exchange has played a dominant role in shaping these genomic architectures. Gene modules are exchanged using host- or phage-encoded recombination machinery16. This analysis provides an important contribution to the field of bacteriophage genomics and a foundation upon which to extend our understanding of the natural predecessors of A. xylosoxidans. Further clarification of the functions of the unique hypothetical phage proteins identified may provide new insight into the mechanisms of genome evolution. Identification of the receptor molecules of phages provides crucial insight into the early stages of infection17. Our results show that phage phiAxp-2 recognizes LPS as its primary receptor for adsorption. Further studies of this phage will be useful in understanding the role of phages in evolution and bacterial lifestyles.

Methods

Bacterial strains, bacteriophage, and media

A 16S rDNA sequence analysis was used to identify the host bacterium. The multidrug-resistant A. xylosoxidans A22732 strain was used as an indicator for phage screening of sewage samples. The samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min to remove the solid impurities, the supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm pore-size membrane filter to remove bacterial debris. The filtrates were mixed with A. xylosoxidans culture to enrich the phage at 37 °C. Following enrichment, the culture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and then the supernatant was filtered with a 0.22 μm pore-size membrane filter to remove the residual bacterial cells. The filtrate (0.1 ml) was mixed with 0.3 ml of A. xylosoxidans in LB culture and 3 ml of molten top soft nutrient agar (0.75% agar), which was then overlaid onto solidified base nutrient agar (1.5% agar). Following incubation for 6 h, clear phage plaques were picked from the plate18. The phage titer was determined with the double-layered method. Luria–Bertani (LB) broth or LB agar was used to culture the bacterium. The host range of the phage was tested against 17 clinical strains from our microorganism center with standard spot tests19.

Electron microscopy

Phage particles were allowed to adsorb onto a carbon-coated copper grid before they were negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.0). After the grid was dried at room temperature, it was examined under a Philips TECNAI-10 transmission electron microscope.

One-step growth curve

For the one-step growth curve analysis, A. xylosoxidans cells (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] = 0.5) were infected with phage phiAxp-2 at a multiplicity of infection of 0.0001. The bacteriophage was allowed to adsorb for 5 min at 37 °C. The mixture was then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 s to remove any unadsorbed phage particles, and the resultant pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of LB medium. The samples were incubated at 37 °C and collected every 20 min for 300 min.

Stability studies

A temperature-controlled incubator was used to determine the stability of phiAxp-2 at different pHs or temperatures, and in the presence of disinfectants or ions. Briefly, a 1.5 ml tube containing a filter-sterilized phage sample was incubated at a specified temperature or pH. After the desired treatment, the tube was cooled slowly and placed in an ice-water bath, and the samples were assayed to determine the surviving plaque-forming units (pfu). To test the phage sensitivity to disinfectants and ions, a known amount of phage was incubated with different concentrations of disinfectants or ions. The plates were then overlain with liquefied soft agar (LB with 0.75% [w/v] agar) containing the host cells and incubated at 37 °C for 12 h.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The purified phage DNA was sequenced with an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencer. The sequence reads were filtered to remove low-quality sequences and trimmed to remove adaptor sequences, and the filtered sequences were assembled. The final assembled sequence was compared with current protein and nucleotide databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (Blast) software20. BlastP was used to determine the similarity of the deduced phage proteins to proteins in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Simulation of the restriction enzyme mapping of the phiAxp-2 genome sequence was carried out using the software package DNAStar. The phiAxp-2 DNA was digested by selected restriction endonucleases (HindIII, purchased from New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). For a reaction system of 20 μL, 10 units of the restriction endonuclease and 300 ng of phiAxp-2 DNA were used. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 180 min and then used to perform agarose gel electrophoresis. Agarose gel electrophoresis was subsequently performed to separate the restriction fragments. The CLC Main Workbench, version 6.1.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) was used to annotate the genome. The computer-based predictions were checked manually. A phylogenetic analysis, together with the published genomic sequences of related phages, was conducted with ClustalW (Slow/Accurate, IUB). Whole-genome comparisons were made with Mauve21.

Identification of the phage receptor

The receptor properties of phiAxp-2 were determined as described previously22. Briefly, A. xylosoxidans A22732 cultures were treated with sodium acetate (50 mM, pH 5.2) containing 100 mM IO4− at room temperature for 2 h (protected from light) or proteinase K (0.2 mg/ml; Promega) at 37 °C for 3 h to determine whether proteinase K or periodate destroys the phage receptor. A phage adsorption assay was then performed, as previously described23. LB medium was used as the nonadsorbing control in each assay, and the phage titer in the control supernatant was set to 100%. Each assay was performed in duplicate and repeated twice22.

Phage inactivation by LPS

LPS was extracted from A. xylosoxidans using an LPS extraction kit from Intron Biotechnology (17144; Boca Scientific, Boca Raton, FL, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A control containing LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (L2630; Sigma, USA), was used as the negative control to ensure that any effect was specific to A. xylosoxidans LPS. Phage inactivation by LPS was tested as previously described24.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

The nucleotide sequence of phiAxp-2 phage reported in this article has been deposited in the GenBank database as accession number KT321316.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Li, E. et al. Identification and molecular characterization of bacteriophage phiAxp-2 of Achromobacter xylosoxidans. Sci. Rep. 6, 34300; doi: 10.1038/srep34300 (2016).
  23 in total

1.  Conserved translational frameshift in dsDNA bacteriophage tail assembly genes.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Roger W Hendrix; Robert L Duda
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Uncommon pathogen: Serious manifestation: A rare case of Achromobacter xylosoxidans septic arthritis in immunocompetetant patient.

Authors:  Kalpana Tikaram Suryavanshi; Sanjay K Lalwani
Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.740

3.  Complete genome sequence of Salmonella bacteriophage SS3e.

Authors:  Sung-Hun Kim; Jeong-Hyun Park; Bok-Kwon Lee; Hyuk-Joon Kwon; Ji-Hyun Shin; Jungmin Kim; Shukho Kim
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Novel strategies to prevent or exploit phages in fermentations, insights from phage-host interactions.

Authors:  Jennifer Mahony; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 9.740

5.  Identification of the lipopolysaccharide core of Yersinia pestis and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis as the receptor for bacteriophage φA1122.

Authors:  Saija Kiljunen; Neeta Datta; Svetlana V Dentovskaya; Andrey P Anisimov; Yuriy A Knirel; José A Bengoechea; Otto Holst; Mikael Skurnik
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Adsorption of the tailed mycoplasma virus L3 to cell membranes.

Authors:  K Haberer; J Maniloff
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  The tail sheath of bacteriophage N4 interacts with the Escherichia coli receptor.

Authors:  Jennifer McPartland; Lucia B Rothman-Denes
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Phage host range and efficiency of plating.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kutter
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

9.  Comparative analysis of two phenotypically-similar but genomically-distinct Burkholderia cenocepacia-specific bacteriophages.

Authors:  Karlene H Lynch; Paul Stothard; Jonathan J Dennis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Genome sequences of two novel phages infecting marine roseobacters.

Authors:  Yanlin Zhao; Kui Wang; Nianzhi Jiao; Feng Chen
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.491

View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of a Novel Bacteriophage vB_AchrS_AchV4 Highlights the Diversity of Achromobacter Viruses.

Authors:  Laura Kaliniene; Algirdas Noreika; Algirdas Kaupinis; Mindaugas Valius; Edvinas Jurgelaitis; Justas Lazutka; Rita Meškienė; Rolandas Meškys
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.048

2.  Isolation and Characterization of AbTJ, an Acinetobacter baumannii Phage, and Functional Identification of Its Receptor-Binding Modules.

Authors:  Jingzhi Xu; Xiaobo Li; Guangbo Kang; Liang Bai; Ping Wang; He Huang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  Properties of Two Broad Host Range Phages of Yersinia enterocolitica Isolated from Wild Animals.

Authors:  Jens A Hammerl; Andrea Barac; Philipp Erben; Julius Fuhrmann; Ashish Gadicherla; Franziska Kumsteller; Anne Lauckner; Felix Müller; Stefan Hertwig
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  In Vitro Design and Evaluation of Phage Cocktails Against Aeromonas salmonicida.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Shengjian Yuan; Quan Liu; Guoqin Mai; Jinfang Yang; Deng Deng; Bingzhao Zhang; Chenli Liu; Yingfei Ma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Characterization of Novel Lytic Bacteriophages of Achromobacter marplantensis Isolated from a Pneumonia Patient.

Authors:  Hiu Tat Chan; Heng Ku; Ying Ping Low; Teagan Brown; Steven Batinovic; Mwila Kabwe; Steve Petrovski; Joseph Tucci
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.