Literature DB >> 27669718

Healthcare Disparities in Hispanic Diabetes Care: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

L Leanne Lai1, Abdullah Alfaifi2,3, Abdullah Althemery2,3.   

Abstract

Hispanics represent the largest minority group in the US. Research has shown that the ethnic minority especially Hispanics have a disproportionate burden of illness associated with diabetes mellitus. However, many have been focused on small sample sizes with potential selection bias. This study aims to examine the ethnicity disparity in health care utilization and expenditures between Hispanic and non-Hispanics after controlling for confounding variables. Cross-sectional with propensity score-matched design. The study revealed that Hispanics with diabetes had higher poverty rates, lower education, less physical activity, and less health care utilization/expenditures than did non-Hispanics. The assessment of ethnicity differences in health care is challenging because of the potential biases that require careful adjustment. This study successfully identified and controlled for confounding bias and concluded the Hispanics disparity in health care utilization still exists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes mellitus; Hispanics; Medical expenditure panel survey; Propensity score matching; Utilization and expenditure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27669718     DOI: 10.1007/s10903-016-0505-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health        ISSN: 1557-1912


  7 in total

1.  Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores.

Authors:  S T Normand; M B Landrum; E Guadagnoli; J Z Ayanian; T J Ryan; P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.

Authors:  B B Hansen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases.

Authors:  W D'Hoore; A Bouckaert; C Tilquin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2012.

Authors:  Debra L Blackwell; Jacqueline W Lucas; Tainya C Clarke
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 10       Date:  2014-02

5.  Racial difference in diabetes preventive care.

Authors:  Jia Pu; Betty Chewning
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2012-12-13

6.  Is the risk of diabetic retinopathy greater in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites with type 2 diabetes? A U.S. population study.

Authors:  M I Harris; R Klein; C C Cowie; M Rowland; D D Byrd-Holt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Diabetes health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Algernon Cargill; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Trends in Medical Expenditures by Race/Ethnicity in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes 2002-2011.

Authors:  Aprill Z Dawson; Kinfe G Bishu; Rebekah J Walker; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 1.798

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.