| Literature DB >> 27669415 |
Pablo López-Soriano1, Karine Boyer2, Sophie Cesbron3, María Clara Morente1, Javier Peñalver1, Ana Palacio-Bielsa4, Christian Vernière2,5, María M López1, Olivier Pruvost2.
Abstract
Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni is the causal agent of the bacterial spot disease of stone fruits, almond and some ornamental Prunus species. In Spain it was first detected in 2002 and since then, several outbreaks have occurred in different regions affecting mainly Japanese plum, peach and almond, both in commercial orchards and nurseries. As the origin of the introduction(s) was unknown, we have assessed the genetic diversity of 239 X. arboricola pv. pruni strains collected from 11 Spanish provinces from 2002 to 2013 and 25 reference strains from international collections. We have developed an optimized multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) scheme targeting 18 microsatellites and five minisatellites. A high discriminatory power was achieved since almost 50% of the Spanish strains were distinguishable, confirming the usefulness of this genotyping technique at small spatio-temporal scales. Spanish strains grouped in 18 genetic clusters (conservatively delineated so that each cluster contained haplotype networks linked by up to quadruple-locus variations). Furthermore, pairwise comparisons among populations from different provinces showed a strong genetic differentiation. Our results suggest multiple introductions of this pathogen in Spain and redistribution through contaminated nursery propagative plant material.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27669415 PMCID: PMC5036818 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Chronological detection of outbreaks of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni in Spain.
1, Badajoz, 2002; 2, Valencia, 2003; 3, Zaragoza, 2004; 4, Alicante, 2006; 5, Huesca, 2008; 6, Lleida, 2008; 7, Teruel, 2009; 8, Navarra, 2009; 9, Mallorca, 2010; 10, Tarragona, 2011; 11, Huelva, 2012. In brackets, number of isolates per province.
TR markers tested on Spanish strains of X. arboricola pv. pruni (n = 239), primers, PCR conditions, number of alleles and Nei’s genetic diversity (HT).
| Name | TR length (bp) | Primers | Annealing T (°C) | Primer concentration (μM) | PCR pool | Range of repeat numbers | Number of alleles (HT) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 1 | 4–6 | 3 (0.154) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 1 | 4–6 | 3 (0.384) | |
| 6 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 1 | 9–11 | 3 (0.017) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 1 | 15–21 | 7 (0.795) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 2 | 7–8 | 2 (0.168) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 2 | 5–6 | 2 (0.132) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 2 | 7–8 | 2 (0.008) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 2 | 9–15 | 7 (0.632) | |
| 7 |
| 66 | 0.3 | 3 | 7–11 | 4 (0.371) | |
| 9 |
| 66 | 0.6 | 3 | 3–4 | 2 (0.008) | |
| 6 |
| 66 | 0.9 | 3 | 6–12 | 7 (0.691) | |
| 7 |
| 66 | 0.6 | 3 | 9–17 | 8 (0.667) | |
| 7 |
| 66 | 0.3 | 4 | 5–8 | 4 (0.207) | |
| 7 |
| 66 | 0.3 | 4 | 5–9 | 5 (0.355) | |
| 7 |
| 66 | 0.3 | 4 | 6–10 | 5 (0.393) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 5 | 5–9 | 5 (0.727) | |
| 8 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 5 | 9–12 | 4 (0.719) | |
| 7 |
| 68 | 0.3 | 5 | 6–7 | 2 (0.285) | |
| 7 |
| 64 | 0.3 | 6 | 10–20 | 11 (0.779) | |
| 112 |
| 68 | 0.3 | A | 2–4 | 2 (0.041) | |
| Xap4422 | 116 |
| 68 | 0.3 | A | ||
| 15 |
| 64 | 1.2 | B | 1–3 | 2 (0.008) | |
| 20 |
| 64 | 0.3 | B | 7–13 | 6 (0.508) | |
| 12 |
| 64 | 0.9 | B | 5–7 | 3 (0.292) |
a Nei’s genetic diversity calculated using ARLEQUIN version 3.01.
b This marker was monomorphic within Spanish strains and was only used to compare them to the worldwide collection.
Genetic diversity estimated from MLVA data of X. arboricola pv. pruni for the strains from 11 sampled Spanish provinces.
| Province | N | Na | A | NH | HE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 33 | 1.30 | 8 | 0.059 | |
| 57 | 62 | 2.37 | 24 | 0.344 | |
| 38 | 70 | 2.56 | 30 | 0.311 | |
| 12 | 26 | 1.04 | 2 | 0.290 | |
| 21 | 52 | 2.09 | 14 | 0.230 | |
| 32 | 34 | 1.28 | 9 | 0.053 | |
| 42 | 68 | 2.48 | 27 | 0.281 | |
| 6 | 3 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| 3 | 1 | ||||
| 239 | 4.30 | 119 | 0.363 |
a Only provinces with n ≥ 12 were selected to calculate diversity indices (Na, A and HE).
b N, number of isolates per province.
c Na, number of alleles.
d A, allelic richness calculated by rarefaction method (n = 12).
e NH, number of haplotypes in each province.
f HE, Nei’s genetic diversity within provinces.
g HT, total Nei’s genetic diversity.
Fig 2Categorical minimum spanning tree from MLVA data (239 strains and 119 haplotypes) representing the genetic diversity of the Spanish strains of X. arboricola pv. pruni in relation with its province of origin.
Dot diameter represents the number of strains per haplotype. Numbers represent the 18 genetic clusters identified. Haplotypes in the same genetic cluster are up to quadruple locus variants. Thick links indicate single locus variants and thin links indicates double locus variants. Shaded areas show different clonal complexes in genetic clusters 1 and 2 and are identified with letters (A-E). Genetic clusters not enclosed in dashed lines are formed by a unique clonal complex or singleton. *Indicates the primary founder haplotype.
Genetic differentiation of Spanish strains of X. arboricola pv. pruni from seven provinces (n ≥ 12) estimated by FST (above the diagonal) and RST (below the diagonal) pairwise comparisons based on MLVA data.
| 0.535 | 0.634 | 0.907 | 0.703 | 0.885 | 0.643 | |||
| 0.367 | 0.206 | 0.379 | 0.263 | 0,421 | 0.238 | |||
| 0.648 | 0.231 | 0.341 | 0.266 | 0.345 | 0.106 | |||
| 0.961 | 0.341 | 0.307 | 0.447 | 0.573 | 0.241 | |||
| 0.821 | 0.325 | 0.331 | 0.458 | 0.507 | 0.220 | |||
| 0.954 | 0.401 | 0.448 | 0.559 | 0.414 | 0.176 | |||
| 0.679 | 0.268 | 0.134 | 0.091 | 0.228 | 0.175 |
a Significance level of FST and RST pairwise comparisons
*P < 0.05;
**P < 0.01;
***P < 0.001;
NSP > 0.005 (non-significant).
Fig 3MDS representation of the distances among 264 strains of X. arboricola pv. pruni.
Countries of origin are represented by different symbols. MDS axes 1–2, 1–3 and 1–4 described 59.3%, 47.4% and 44.4% of the total variation, respectively.