Hanna Falk1,2, Ingela Henoch3, Anneli Ozanne4, Joakim Öhlen5,6,7, Eva Jakobsson Ung8, Isabell Fridh9, Elisabeth Kenne Sarenmalm10, Kristin Falk3,8. 1. Assistant Professor, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.falk@gu.se. 2. Assistant Professor, University of Gothenburg, Centre for Ageing and Health (AGECAP), Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.falk@gu.se. 3. Associate Professor, University of Gothenburg, Centre for Ageing and Health (AGECAP), Gothenburg, Sweden. 4. Assistant Professor, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden. 5. Professor, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden. 6. Professor, Palliative Research Centre, Ersta Sköndal University College, Stockholm, Sweden. 7. Professor, University of Gothenburg, Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Gothenburg, Sweden. 8. Associate Professor, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden. 9. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare University of Borås, Borås, Sweden. 10. Operations Manager, Research and Development, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore patient-reported symptom distress in relation to documentation of symptoms and palliative care designation in hospital inpatients. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 710 inpatients at two large hospitals in Sweden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Chart reviews focused on nurses' and physicians' symptom documentation and palliative turning point. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and provided summaries about the sample. Patients were grouped according to gender, age, palliative care designation, and symptom documentation. The t test and chi-square test were used to calculate whether symptom distress varied between groups. A two-way analysis of variance was conducted for multiple comparisons to explore the impact of gender and age on mean symptom distress. FINDINGS: Females reported higher levels of symptom distress than did males related to pain, fatigue, and nausea. When comparing symptom distress between males and females with documentation pertaining to symptoms, there were significant differences implying that females had to report higher levels of symptom distress than males in order to have their symptoms documented. CONCLUSIONS: Females need to report higher levels of symptom distress than do males for healthcare professionals to identify and document their symptoms. It can be hypothesized that females are not receiving the same attention and symptom alleviation as men. If so, this highlights a serious inequality in care that requires further exploration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering that common reasons why people seek health care are troublesome symptoms of illness, and that the clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients are changing towards more advanced ages with serious illnesses, inadequate symptom assessment and management are a serious threat to the care quality.
PURPOSE: To explore patient-reported symptom distress in relation to documentation of symptoms and palliative care designation in hospital inpatients. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 710 inpatients at two large hospitals in Sweden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Chart reviews focused on nurses' and physicians' symptom documentation and palliative turning point. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and provided summaries about the sample. Patients were grouped according to gender, age, palliative care designation, and symptom documentation. The t test and chi-square test were used to calculate whether symptom distress varied between groups. A two-way analysis of variance was conducted for multiple comparisons to explore the impact of gender and age on mean symptom distress. FINDINGS: Females reported higher levels of symptom distress than did males related to pain, fatigue, and nausea. When comparing symptom distress between males and females with documentation pertaining to symptoms, there were significant differences implying that females had to report higher levels of symptom distress than males in order to have their symptoms documented. CONCLUSIONS: Females need to report higher levels of symptom distress than do males for healthcare professionals to identify and document their symptoms. It can be hypothesized that females are not receiving the same attention and symptom alleviation as men. If so, this highlights a serious inequality in care that requires further exploration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering that common reasons why people seek health care are troublesome symptoms of illness, and that the clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients are changing towards more advanced ages with serious illnesses, inadequate symptom assessment and management are a serious threat to the care quality.
Authors: Teresa L Hagan; Stephanie Gilbertson-White; Susan M Cohen; Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Heidi S Donovan Journal: Clin J Oncol Nurs Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 1.027
Authors: Xavier Busquet-Duran; Eduard Moreno-Gabriel; Eva Maria Jiménez-Zafra; Magda Tura-Poma; Olga Bosch-DelaRosa; Anna Moragas-Roca; Susana Martin-Moreno; Emilio Martínez-Losada; Silvia Crespo-Ramírez; Lola Lestón-Lado; Núria Salamero-Tura; Joana Llobera-Estrany; Ariadna Salvago-Leiracha; Ana Isabel López-García; Josep María Manresa-Domínguez; Teresa Morandi-Garde; Eda Sara Persentili-Viure; Pere Torán-Monserrat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.390