Literature DB >> 27668487

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Assessment of Core CBT Skills (ACCS): An observation-based tool for assessing cognitive behavioral therapy competence.

Kate Muse1, Freda McManus2, Sarah Rakovshik3, Richard Thwaites4.   

Abstract

This article outlines the development and psychometric evaluation of the Assessment of Core CBT Skills (ACCS) rating scale. The ACCS aims to provide a novel assessment framework to deliver formative and summative feedback regarding therapists' performance within observed cognitive-behavioral treatment sessions, and for therapists to rate and reflect on their own performance. Findings from 3 studies are outlined: (a) a feedback study (n = 66) examining content validity, face validity and usability; (b) a focus group (n = 9) evaluating usability and utility; and (c) an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the ACCS in real world cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) training and routine clinical practice contexts. Results suggest that the ACCS has good face validity, content validity, and usability and provides a user-friendly tool that is useful for promoting self-reflection and providing formative feedback. Scores on both the self and assessor-rated versions of the ACCS demonstrate good internal consistency, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. In addition, ACCS scores were found to be correlated with, but distinct from, the Revised Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS-R) and were comparable to CTS-R scores in terms of internal consistency and discriminant validity. In addition, the ACCS may have advantages over the CTS-R in terms of interrater reliability of scores. The studies also provided insight into areas for refinement and a number of modifications were undertaken to improve the scale. In summary, the ACCS is an appropriate and useful measure of CBT competence that can be used to promote self-reflection and provide therapists with formative and summative feedback. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27668487     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  4 in total

1.  Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Competency: Pilot Data from a Comparison of Multiple Perspectives.

Authors:  David C Rozek; Jamie L Serrano; Brigid R Marriott; Kelli S Scott; L Brian Hickman; Brittany M Brothers; Cara C Lewis; Anne D Simons
Journal:  Behav Cogn Psychother       Date:  2017-11-02

2.  Development of a transdiagnostic, low-intensity, psychological intervention for common adolescent mental health problems in Indian secondary schools.

Authors:  Daniel Michelson; Kanika Malik; Madhuri Krishna; Rhea Sharma; Sonal Mathur; Bhargav Bhat; Rachana Parikh; Kallol Roy; Akankasha Joshi; Rooplata Sahu; Bhagwant Chilhate; Maya Boustani; Pim Cuijpers; Bruce Chorpita; Christopher G Fairburn; Vikram Patel
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  The effectiveness of a low-intensity problem-solving intervention for common adolescent mental health problems in New Delhi, India: protocol for a school-based, individually randomized controlled trial with an embedded stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled recruitment trial.

Authors:  Rachana Parikh; Daniel Michelson; Kanika Malik; Sachin Shinde; Helen A Weiss; Adriaan Hoogendoorn; Jeroen Ruwaard; Madhuri Krishna; Rhea Sharma; Bhargav Bhat; Rooplata Sahu; Sonal Mathur; Paulomi Sudhir; Michael King; Pim Cuijpers; Bruce F Chorpita; Christopher G Fairburn; Vikram Patel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Remote delivery of CBT training, clinical supervision and services: in times of crisis or business as usual.

Authors:  Paul Cromarty; Dominic Gallagher; Julianne Watson
Journal:  Cogn Behav Therap       Date:  2020-08-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.