Literature DB >> 27668331

Efficacy of intraoperative cell salvage in decreasing perioperative blood transfusion rates in first-time cardiac surgery patients: a retrospective study.

Claudia L Côté1, Alexandra M Yip1, Jeffrey B MacLeod1, Bill O'Reilly1, Joshua Murray1, Maral Ouzounian1, Craig D Brown1, Rand Forgie1, Marc P Pelletier1, Ansar Hassan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in transfusion reduction during cardiac surgery remains conflicting. We sought to evaluate the impact of routine ICS on outcomes following cardiac surgery.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nonemergent, first-time cardiac surgery 18 months before and 18 months after the implementation of routine ICS. Perioperative transfusion rates, postoperative bleeding, clinical and hematological outcomes, and overall cost were examined. We used multivariable logistic regression modelling to determine the risk-adjusted effect of ICS on likelihood of perioperative transfusion.
RESULTS: A total of 389 patients formed the final study population (186 undergoing ICS and 203 controls). Patients undergoing ICS had significantly lower perioperative transfusion rates of packed red blood cells (pRBCs; 33.9% v. 45.3% p = 0.021), coagulation products (16.7% v. 32.5% p < 0.001) and any blood product (38.2% v. 52.7%, p = 0.004). Patients receiving ICS had decreased mediastinal drainage at 12 h (mean 320 [range 230-550] mL v. mean 400 [range 260-690] mL, p = 0.011) and increased postoperative hemoglobin (mean 104.7 ± 13.2 g/L v. 95.0 ± 11.9 g/L, p < 0.001). Following adjustment for other baseline and intraoperative covariates, ICS emerged as an independent predictor of lower perioperative transfusion rates of pRBCs (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.87), coagulation products (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.71) and any blood product (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.77). Additionally, ICS was associated with a cost benefit of $116 per patient.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative cell salvage could represent a clinically cost-effective way of reducing transfusion rates in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Further research on systematic ICS is required before recommending it for routine use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27668331      PMCID: PMC5042720          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.002216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  26 in total

1.  Elimination of fat microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Aditya K Kaza; Jeffrey T Cope; Steven M Fiser; Stewart M Long; John A Kern; Irving L Kron; Curtis G Tribble
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion.

Authors:  Paul A Carless; David A Henry; Annette J Moxey; Dianne O'Connell; Tamara Brown; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

3.  The least of 3 evils: exposure to red blood cell transfusion, anemia, or both?

Authors:  Gabriel Loor; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Liang Li; Joseph F Sabik; Eugene H Blackstone; Keith R McCrae; Colleen G Koch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Randomized controlled trial of pericardial blood processing with a cell-saving device on neurologic markers in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Michel Carrier; André Denault; Joel Lavoie; Louis P Perrault
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Pump blood processing, salvage and re-transfusion improves hemoglobin levels after coronary artery bypass grafting, but affects coagulative and fibrinolytic systems.

Authors:  G Scrascia; C Rotunno; D Nanna; R Rociola; P Guida; G Rubino; L de Luca Tupputi Schinosa; D Paparella
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The volume of returned red blood cells in a large blood salvage program: where does it all go?

Authors:  Jonathan H Waters; Robert M Dyga; Janet F R Waters; Mark H Yazer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Autotransfusion of washed shed mediastinal fluid decreases the requirement for autologous blood transfusion following cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  M J Dalrymple-Hay; L Pack; C D Deakin; S Shephard; S K Ohri; M P Haw; S A Livesey; J L Monro
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Continuous-flow cell saver reduces cognitive decline in elderly patients after coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  George Djaiani; Ludwik Fedorko; Michael A Borger; Robin Green; Jo Carroll; Michael Marcon; Jacek Karski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Coronary surgery without cardiotomy suction and autotransfusion reduces the postoperative systemic inflammatory response.

Authors:  Martin Westerberg; Anders Bengtsson; Anders Jeppsson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  The cardiotomy trial: a randomized, double-blind study to assess the effect of processing of shed blood during cardiopulmonary bypass on transfusion and neurocognitive function.

Authors:  Fraser D Rubens; Munir Boodhwani; Thierry Mesana; Denise Wozny; George Wells; Howard J Nathan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Cell salvage : Scientific evidence, clinical practice and legal framework].

Authors:  T Seyfried; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.