Literature DB >> 27668296

Physical Therapy Intervention to Augment Outcomes Of Lymph Node Transfer Surgery for a Breast Cancer Survivor with Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Case Report.

Katelyn P McKey1, Meryl J Alappattu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Lymphedema is an incurable complication of breast cancer treatment that affects roughly 20 percent of women. It is often managed via complete decongestive therapy, which includes manual lymph drainage, therapeutic compression, skin care, and exercise. Lymph node transfer is a new and expensive surgical intervention that uses one's own lymph nodes and implants them in the affected upper extremity. Previous research has investigated augmenting lymph node transfer surgery with complete decongestive therapy, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the success of focusing lymph drainage against the normal pressure gradient toward a surgical flap located on the wrist. The patient's main motivation for the surgical intervention was to alleviate her daily burden of complete decongestive therapy. The purpose of this case report was to compare the methods and results of pre-surgical complete decongestive physical therapy to a post-operation modified approach that directed lymph fluid away from the major lymphatic ducts and instead toward a surgical flap on the wrist of a patient with lymphedema. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 65-year-old female presented with secondary upper extremity lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Her circumferential measurements and L-Dex score corroborated this diagnosis, and she had functional deficits in upper extremity range of motion. She was seen for 10 visits of traditional complete decongestive therapy prior to her lymph node transfer surgery and 24 treatments of modified complete decongestive therapy over the course of six months following surgery. OUTCOMES: At six months, the patient had minor improvements in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, range of motion, and upper extremity strength. However, her circumferential measurements and L-Dex scores showed a meaningful increase in limb girth. DISCUSSION: The patient's smallest upper extremity volumes were documented before the operation after two weeks of complete decongestive therapy. The surgical intervention supplemented by modified complete decongestive therapy resulted in increased limb girth after six months. Although the patient was able to stop wearing her compression garment while continuing independent manual lymph drainage and upper extremity wrapping, the post-surgical intervention was not a success because the patient's circumferential measurements remained meaningfully higher than at her initial examination. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of this surgery when coupled with physical therapy intervention, and whether it has better outcomes than the standard conservative treatment of complete decongestive therapy alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decongestive; intervention; outcome

Year:  2015        PMID: 27668296      PMCID: PMC5034944     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stud Scholarsh Phys Ther


  16 in total

1.  Heterogeneous assessment of shoulder disorders: validation of the Standardized Index of Shoulder Function.

Authors:  Arnaud Dupeyron; Anthony Gelis; Philippe Sablayrolles; Philippe-Jean Bousquet; Marc Julia; Christian Herisson; Jacques Pélissier; Philippe Codine
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.

Authors:  Richard Taylor; Upali W Jayasinghe; Louise Koelmeyer; Owen Ung; John Boyages
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-02

3.  Evaluating change in clinical status: reliability and measures of agreement for the assessment of glenohumeral range of motion.

Authors:  Susan W Muir; Charlene Luciak Corea; Lauren Beaupre
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-09

4.  L-dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.

Authors:  M R Fu; C M Cleland; A A Guth; M Kayal; J Haber; F Cartwright; R Kleinman; Y Kang; J Scagliola; D Axelrod
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.286

5.  Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Mark Sorensen; Elliot Chartash; Nishan Sengupta; James Grober
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Criterion-related validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle edema.

Authors:  R H Mawdsley; D K Hoy; P M Erwin
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Saadet Ugur; Cumhur Arıcı; Muhittin Yaprak; Ayhan Mescı; Gulbin Ayse Arıcı; Kemal Dolay; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.589

8.  Postmastectomy lymphedema: long-term results following microsurgical lymph node transplantation.

Authors:  Corinne Becker; Jalal Assouad; Marc Riquet; Geneviève Hidden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Patient-reported upper extremity outcome measures used in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shana Harrington; Lori A Michener; Tiffany Kendig; Susan Miale; Steven Z George
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery.

Authors:  Christina Gummesson; Isam Atroshi; Charlotte Ekdahl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.