Literature DB >> 27667839

Time Spent, Workload, and Student and Faculty Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment.

Jennifer A Phillips1, Christie Schumacher1, Sally Arif1.   

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate student perception and time spent on asynchronous online lectures in a blended learning environment (BLE) and to assess faculty workload and perception. Methods. Students (n=427) time spent viewing online lectures was measured in three courses. Students and faculty members completed a survey to assess perceptions of a BLE. Faculty members recorded time spent creating BLEs. Results. Total time spent in the BLE was less than the allocated time for two of the three courses by 3-15%. Students preferred online lectures for their flexibility, students' ability to apply information learned, and congruence with their learning styles. Faculty members reported the BLE facilitated higher levels of learning during class sessions but noted an increase in workload. Conclusion. A BLE increased faculty workload but was well received by students. Time spent viewing online lectures was less than what was allocated in two of the three courses.

Keywords:  blended learning; contact hours; workload

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27667839      PMCID: PMC5023973          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe806102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  11 in total

1.  An elective course in adult acute care medicine using a hybrid delivery system.

Authors:  Antonia Zapantis; Caridad Machado; Ruth Nemire; Simon Leung
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Mary T Roth; Dylan M Glatt; Nastaran Gharkholonarehe; Christopher A Davidson; LaToya M Griffin; Denise A Esserman; Russell J Mumper
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  An advanced cardiovascular pharmacotherapy course blending online and face-to-face instruction.

Authors:  Michael A Crouch
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Transforming a large-class lecture course to a smaller-group interactive course.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  The impact of blended learning on student performance in a cardiovascular pharmacotherapy course.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Nastaran Gharkholonarehe; Julia Khanova; Zach M Deyo; Jo E Rodgers
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  A model of blended learning in a preclinical course in prosthetic dentistry.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Ira Sierwald; Florian Berger; Guido Heydecke
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Combined use of online tutorials and hands-on group exercises in bibliographic instruction for pharmacy students.

Authors:  Mariana Lapidus; Sarah K McCord; William W McCloskey; Maria D Kostka-Rokosz
Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q       Date:  2012

8.  Utilization of blended learning to teach preclinical endodontics.

Authors:  Cristina Maresca; Carlos Barrero; Dereck Duggan; Enrique Platin; Eric Rivera; Wallace Hannum; Frank Petrola
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions.

Authors:  David A Cook; Sarah Garside; Anthony J Levinson; Denise M Dupras; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Dragan Ilic; Rusli Bin Nordin; Paul Glasziou; Julie K Tilson; Elmer Villanueva
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  5 in total

1.  Massive Open Online Courses-based blended versus face-to-face classroom teaching methods for fundamental nursing course.

Authors:  Wenjing Cao; Lin Hu; Xiaoying Li; Xiaoling Li; Chuan Chen; Qianqian Zhang; Shunwang Cao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  A model for the use of blended learning in large group teaching sessions.

Authors:  Cristan Herbert; Gary M Velan; Wendy M Pryor; Rakesh K Kumar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  "We are still putting out fires": Considering educator intentionality in remote instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Natalie Sue Svrcek; Logan Rath; Kathleen Olmstead; Kathleen Colantonio-Yurko
Journal:  Educ Inf Technol (Dordr)       Date:  2021-08-31

4.  The effects of a newly established online learning management system: the perspectives of Thai medical students in a public medical school.

Authors:  Isaraporn Thepwongsa; Poompong Sripa; Radhakrishnan Muthukumar; Kamonwan Jenwitheesuk; Surapol Virasiri; Pat Nonjui
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  Effectiveness of blended learning in pharmacy education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Athira Balakrishnan; Sandra Puthean; Gautam Satheesh; Unnikrishnan M K; Muhammed Rashid; Sreedharan Nair; Girish Thunga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.