Literature DB >> 27667776

Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning.

Nathan F Dieckmann1,2, Robin Gregory2, Ellen Peters3, Robert Hartman4.   

Abstract

In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.
© 2016 Society for Risk Analysis.

Keywords:  Motivated reasoning; risk communication; uncertainty; worldviews

Year:  2016        PMID: 27667776     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  7 in total

1.  Communication of Scientific Uncertainty about a Novel Pandemic Health Threat: Ambiguity Aversion and Its Mechanisms.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Christine W Duarte; Megan Knaus; Adam Black; Aaron M Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-04-12

2.  Why do scientists disagree? Explaining and improving measures of the perceived causes of scientific disputes.

Authors:  Nathan F Dieckmann; Branden B Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Psychological Impact of Ambiguous Health Messages about COVID-19.

Authors:  Nicolle Simonovic; Jennifer M Taber
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-23

4.  Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science: Implications for Science Education.

Authors:  Beth A Covitt; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Sci Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.921

5.  Characterizing public perceptions of social and cultural impacts in policy decisions.

Authors:  Nathan F Dieckmann; Robin Gregory; Terre Satterfield; Marcus Mayorga; Paul Slovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Impact of Communicating Uncertainty on Public Responses to Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Chelsea L Ratcliff; Bob Wong; Jakob D Jensen; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-10-27

7.  The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers.

Authors:  Anne Marthe van der Bles; Sander van der Linden; Alexandra L J Freeman; David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.