Anna Potulska-Chromik1, Dorota Hoffman-Zacharska2, Małgorzata Łukawska3, Anna Kostera-Pruszczyk4. 1. Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: apotulska@wum.edu.pl. 2. Department of Medical Genetics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland. 3. Student Scientific Group by the Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 4. Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is a rare form of hereditary movement disorder with onset in childhood, characterized by gait difficulties due to postural dystonia with marked improvement after low doses of levodopa. Mutations in the GCH1 gene are the most common cause of DRD, however, in some cases when the disease is associated with parkinsonism mutations in the PARK2 gene may be identified. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare genotype-phenotype correlation. MATERIAL/PARTICIPANTS: Four families with inter- and intrafamilial variability of progressive gait dysfunction due to lower limb dystonia occurring in childhood or adolescence were included in the analysis. METHODS: General and neurological examination was performed for all affected family members and asymptomatic mutation carriers. The molecular analysis encompassed GCH1 and PARK2 genes. RESULTS: All probands were clinically diagnosed with DRD. The molecular analysis revealed, however, that the dopa-responsive dystonia phenotype was caused by a mutation in the GCH1 gene in three families and in the PARK2 gene in one family. Obtained results allowed to establish the final diagnosis for all families as DYT5a or early-onset Parkinson disease (EO-PD). CONCLUSIONS: Reported cases confirm that the DRD phenotype may have heterogeneous genetic background and may be caused by point mutations or rearrangements in the GCH1 gene as well as in the PARK2 gene. Differential diagnosis and genetic tests covering the analysis of genes causative for DRD and EO-PD should be obligatory in both disorders diagnostics as DRD, mainly adolescent onset dystonia, may be associated with parkinsonism.
OBJECTIVE:Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is a rare form of hereditary movement disorder with onset in childhood, characterized by gait difficulties due to postural dystonia with marked improvement after low doses of levodopa. Mutations in the GCH1 gene are the most common cause of DRD, however, in some cases when the disease is associated with parkinsonism mutations in the PARK2 gene may be identified. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare genotype-phenotype correlation. MATERIAL/PARTICIPANTS: Four families with inter- and intrafamilial variability of progressive gait dysfunction due to lower limb dystonia occurring in childhood or adolescence were included in the analysis. METHODS: General and neurological examination was performed for all affected family members and asymptomatic mutation carriers. The molecular analysis encompassed GCH1 and PARK2 genes. RESULTS: All probands were clinically diagnosed with DRD. The molecular analysis revealed, however, that the dopa-responsive dystonia phenotype was caused by a mutation in the GCH1 gene in three families and in the PARK2 gene in one family. Obtained results allowed to establish the final diagnosis for all families as DYT5a or early-onset Parkinson disease (EO-PD). CONCLUSIONS: Reported cases confirm that the DRD phenotype may have heterogeneous genetic background and may be caused by point mutations or rearrangements in the GCH1 gene as well as in the PARK2 gene. Differential diagnosis and genetic tests covering the analysis of genes causative for DRD and EO-PD should be obligatory in both disorders diagnostics as DRD, mainly adolescent onset dystonia, may be associated with parkinsonism.
Authors: Chang Liu; Laura Scorr; Gamze Kilic-Berkmen; Adam Cotton; Stewart A Factor; Alan Freeman; ViLinh Tran; Ken Liu; Karan Uppal; Dean Jones; H A Jinnah; Yan V Sun Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Matthew Benger; Kshitij Mankad; Christos Proukakis; Nicholas D Mazarakis; Maria Kinali Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 4.003