| Literature DB >> 27667011 |
Hirotoshi Sakaguchi1, Nobuhiro Watanabe2, Kimikazu Matsumoto3, Hiromasa Yabe4, Shunichi Kato4, Atsushi Ogawa5, Jiro Inagaki6, Hiroaki Goto7, Katsuyoshi Koh8, Nao Yoshida9, Keisuke Kato10, Yuko Cho11, Yoshiyuki Kosaka12, Yoshiyuki Takahashi13, Masami Inoue14, Koji Kato9, Yoshiko Atsuta15, Koichi Miyamura16.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the best therapeutic option for childhood high-risk acute leukemia. However, which donor source is optimal for children lacking an identical sibling remains unclear. To evaluate the clinical impact of donor source on allo-HSCT in childhood acute leukemia, we analyzed data from 577 children who underwent allo-HSCT after a myeloablative regimen during first or second complete remission from 2005 to 2012, using registry data of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, and we compared outcomes of 7/8 to 8/8 HLA allelic-matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UR-BMT, n = 218) and 4/6 to 6/6 HLA allelic-matched unrelated cord blood transplantation (UR-CBT, n = 200) to those of HLA-identical related bone marrow transplantation (ID-BMT, n = 159). The median follow-up of survivors was 40.0 months. Three-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates for ID-BMT, UR-BMT, and UR-CBT were 74.8% and 69.0%, 75.0% and 69.6%, and 71.8% and 63.8%, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that OS and LFS for the 3 groups are comparable, although UR-CBT carries a greater risk of nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio, 2.20; P = .03, compared to ID-BMT) in the myeloablative setting for childhood high-risk acute leukemia.Entities:
Keywords: Alternative donor; Childhood acute leukemia; Nationwide study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27667011 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742