Literature DB >> 27666661

Molecular screening strategies for NF1-like syndromes with café-au-lait macules (Review).

Jia Zhang1, Ming Li1, Zhirong Yao1.   

Abstract

Multiple café-au-lait macules (CALM) are usually associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), one of the most common hereditary disorders. However, a group of genetic disorders presenting with CALM have mutations that are involved in human skin pigmentation regulation signaling pathways, including KIT ligand/KIT proto‑oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase and Ras/mitogen‑activated protein kinase. These disorders, which include Legius syndrome, Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines or LEOPARD syndrome, and familial progressive hyperpigmentation) are difficult to distinguish from NF1 at early stages, using skin appearance alone. Furthermore, certain syndromes are clinically overlapping and molecular testing is a vital diagnostic method. The present review aims to provide an overview of these 'NF1‑like' inherited diseases and recommend a cost‑effective strategy for making a clear diagnosis among these diseases with an ambiguous borderline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27666661      PMCID: PMC5112360          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1; OMIM 162200) is one of the most common hereditary disorders. It is predominantly characterized by multiple café-au-lait macules (CALM), skin-fold freckling, Lisch nodules and neurofibromas. However, as the condition exhibits age-dependent characteristics and there are a number of other overlapping syndromes and similar diseases, it is usually difficult to make an early clinical diagnosis. Currently, although there are numerous comprehensive detection methods available for molecular diagnosis of NF1, the highest sensitivity of any of these methods is ~95% (1,2). In addition to the limitations of detection by these approaches, cases of mosaic NF1 have been reported and there may exist other known or undefined genetic conditions with similar phenotypes. KIT ligand (KITLG) and its receptor KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) activate the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and they are critical in the control of physiological and pathological cutaneous pigmentation, including CALM (3). Known disorders with CALM comprise: i) A group of genetic syndromes resulting from germline mutations in genes that encode components or regulators of the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway, designated RASopathies, which consists of Noonan syndrome (NS; OMIM 163950), Legius syndrome [formerly termed NF1-like syndrome (NFLS); OMIM 611431], LEOPARD syndrome (LS; OMIM 151100), Costello syndrome (CS; OMIM 218040) and cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFC; OMIM 115150), ii) disorders involving the KITLG/KIT signaling pathway, including piebaldism (OMIM 172800) and familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH; OMIM 145250). Although there are unique phenotypic characteristics for these conditions, certain syndromes remain highly overlapping and the differential diagnosis between them and NF1 is complex. Our group recently conducted a large molecular research investigation into NF1 in a Chinese population (4–6). Patients without NF1 mutations who exhibited CALM were observed, and in a further study, other syndromes were demonstrated, including an atypical LS patient with a PTPN11 mutation, a piebaldism patient with a KIT mutation and a familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation (FPHH) patient with a KITLG mutation. The present review discusses these KITLG/c-Kit- and Ras/MAPK signaling pathway-associated ‘NF1-like’ inherited diseases, and proposes a molecular screening strategy to aid the determination of a definitive diagnosis.

The RASopathies with CALM

NFLS

NFLS presents predominantly with CALM, intertriginous freckling and certain less common manifestations (~20%), including neurocognitive impairment, developmental delay and macrocephaly, usually without neurofibromas, Lisch nodules, optic pathway glioma and other tumors (7,8). More than 60% of the patients have a family history of the condition (9). These features meet three of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnostic criteria for NF1 (10), thus, it is not reliable to distinguish NF1 from NFLS relying solely on clinical examination. Germline loss-of-function sprouty related, EVH1 domain containing 1 (SPRED1) mutations are responsible for this syndrome, which is most similar to NF1 in early childhood (11). It is estimated that ~1–4% of individuals with multiple CALM harbor heterozygous SPRED1 mutations (7,9). In subjects with familial CALM, with or without freckling and no other NF1 features, 73% and 19% carry pathogenic NF1 mutations or SPRED1 mutations, respectively (7), which further indicates that genetic testing is useful in diagnosis in these cases (92%). SPRED1 is involved in regulation of the MAPK signaling pathway, previous studies have demonstrated a loss of heterozygosity in pediatric acute myeloblastic leukemia, acting as a tumor suppressor (12,13), this also indicates that this syndrome increases the risk of developing specific hematological malignancies, as well as other rare conditions, including kidney and lung cancer (8).

LS

LS is an autosomal dominant RASopathy, predominantly caused by mutations in protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11 (PTPN11; 85%), in addition to less common genes, Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (RAF1) and B-raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) (10%). Individuals present with characteristic multiple lentigines, and relatively common features of RASopathies, including facial dysmorphia, myocardial and valvular abnormalities, and hearing loss. It is hard to clinically distinguish LS from other RASopathies, such as NF1 and NS, while molecular diagnosis is relatively reliable. Twelve different missense PTPN11 mutations (Tyr279Cys/Ser, Ala461Thr/Ser, Gly464Ala, Thr468Met/Pro, Arg498Leu/Trp, Gln506Pro and Gln510Glu/Pro) (14–18) were reported to result in LS. Two of these mutations (Tyr279Cys and Thr468Met) account for ~65% of the cases. Notably, these mutations cluster in the catalytic protein tyrosine phosphatase domain (amino acid residues, 221–524) (19), as in the allelic disorder, NS, the majority of missense mutations, small deletions and indels (20,21) are associated with the N-SH2 domain (amino acid residues, 3–104) (14). Contrary to the gain-of-function changes resulting in excessive PTPN11 activity in NS (12), LS mutants are catalytically defective and exert a dominant negative effect (22), suggesting that mutation type and region are important in the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and differential diagnoses of NS and LS. A recent study has suggested that LS-associated mutations may increase melanin synthesis in melanocytes via the activation of Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling, thus, resulting in a phenotype with multiple lentigines (23). Furthermore, a recent study identified a novel heterozygous MAPK kinase 1 (MAP2K1) mutation in LS, Glu102Gly (24), this is notable as mutations in this gene are usually associated with CFC. LS shares numerous phenotypic traits with CFC. Including this case, at present, germline mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF genes are associated with CFC and LS. CALM and multiple nevi or lentigines are rare or absent in CFC patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations (25), further demonstrating the complicated genetic heterogeneity and prominent overlapping feature of RASopathies. CALM precede or are associated with lentigines in~10% of NS cases (26), and in up to 75% of LS cases (27), furthermore, in LS cases, the number of CALM can fulfills NIH criteria for diagnosis with NF1 (28). Lentigines usually appear during childhood as black-brown macules, predominantly on the face, neck and upper part of the trunk, and gradually increase in number and darken in color with age. Although LS patients have unclear disposition to malignancies, certain studies have reported an association with hematologic malignancies (29) and medulloblastoma (30), which should be noted.

NS-CFC-CS spectrum

NS shares numerous congenital anomalies with LS, excluding multiple lentigines. CFC and CS also have various clinical similarities and few differences compared with NS (25). Previously, clinical discrimination between these three syndromes was predominantly based on respective characteristic features, including hyperkeratotic skin, ichthyosis and keratosis pilaris in CFC patients; and soft and loose skin, deep palmar/plantar creases, nasal papillomas and an increased risk of developing malignancies in those with CS (31,32). However, as the reported cases of RASopathies increase, these distinct features have also become highly overlapped. Previous studies have demonstrated that one or two CALM are observed in 9–31% of individuals in NS-CFC-CS spectrum disorders, this is markedly higher than the overall prevalence of 2.5% in neonates (33), while multiple CALM and intertriginous freckling were rare or absent (25,26,34). In combination with the less common dysmorphic craniofacial features in NF1, the discrimination between these conditions and NF1 is relatively easier. KRAS mutations associated with the NS-CFC-CS spectrum predominantly confer mild gain-of-function effect (35). The present review suggests that KRAS mutations associated with the NS-CFC-CS spectrum belong to an identical entity relatively close to NS (see Table I, which provides a proper hypothesis for a new classification of these RASopathies and corresponding causal genes) as: i) CFC, NS and CS exhibit numerous clinical similarities and few differences (25,36,37); ii) KRAS mutations have been reported in <2% of the NS and CFC cases (37), as well as in only a handful of CS patients (35,38), and all three of the independent conditions demonstrated their major pathogenic form, PTPN11, BRAF and HRAS, respectively (presented in Table I); iii) mutations Asp153Val, Thr58Ile and other missense mutations in the same amino acid residue in KRAS were reported to result in NS and CFC (25,39,40); iv) less prominent ectodermal phenotypes were observed in CFC and CS with KRAS mutations than those with BRAF mutations (25,34,39,41); v) multiple nevi or lentigines were rare or absent in CFC patients with KRAS mutations compared with those with mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF (25).
Table I.

‘NF1-like’ genetic disorders with CALM involved in KITLG/c-Kit and Ras/MAPK signaling pathways.

Genetic disorderKnown causal genes (proportion)Disease identityGene identityCharacteristic features
NSPTPN11 (50%) SOS1 (10–15%) RAF1 (5%) RIT1 (5%) KRAS (<2%) BRAF (rare) NRAS (rare) SHOC2 (rare) CBL (rare)NSPTPN11 SOS1 RAF1 RIT1 NRAS SHOC2 CBLCALM (10%). Dysmorphic craniofacial features, cardiac defect (pulmonary valve stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), musculoskeletal abnormalities, mental retardation, cryptorchidism, hematologic malignancies
KRAS-associated NS-CFC-CS spectrumKRASLess prominent ectodermal phenotypes; multiple nevi or lentigines were rare or absent
CFCBRAF (50–70%) MAP2K1/2 (25%) KRAS (<2%)CFCBRAF MAP2K1/2CALM (9–31%). Similar to NS. Ectodermal abnormalities such as multiple nevi, keratosis pilaris, ulerythema ophryogenes and brittle, sparse, curly hair. Potential cancer risk
CSHRAS (>90%) BRAF (rare) KRAS (rare)CSHRASCALM (rare). Similar to NS. Ectodermal abnormalities like soft skin, deep palmar/plantar creases, papillomas and curly hair. Severe failure to thrive. Significant cancer risk (17%)
LSPTPN11 (85%) RAF1 (rare) BRAF (rare) MAP2K1 (1 case)CALM (70–80%). Similar to NS, but with multiple lentigines mostly on face, neck and upper part of the trunk. Unclear cancer risk
NFLSSPRED1Multiple CALM (nearly 100%), intertriginous freckling. Potential risk of pediatric AML
PiebaldismKITDepigmented patches of skin and hair
FPH and FPHHKITLGFPHHKITLGDiffuse, partly blotchy hyperpigmented lesions intermingled with scattered hypopigmentations, lentigines and CALM

NF1, neurofibromatosis type 1; CALM, café-au-lait macules; KITLG, KIT ligand; c-Kit, KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NS, Noonan syndrome; CFC, cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome; CS, Costello syndrome; LS, LEOPARD syndrome; NFLS, NF1-like syndrome, Legius syndrome; FPH, familial progressive hyperpigmentation; FPHH, familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation; HRAS, Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; PTPN11, protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11; SOS1, son of severnless homolog 1; RAF1, Raf-1 proto-oncogene serine/threonine protein kinase; RIT1, Ras-like without CAAX 1; BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; NRAS, neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog; SHOC2, SHOC2 leucine-rich repeat scaffold protein; CBL, Cbl proto-oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; MAP2K, MAPK kinase; SPRED1, sprouty related, EVH1 domain containing 1.

In the majority of instances, BRAF mutations resulting in NS have not been observed in CFC, suggesting the associated phenotypes may be allele specific (42), however, a number of BRAF mutations, including Ala246Pro and Gln257Arg, have been demonstrated in the two conditions (25). Previous studies have also demonstrated the evolution of the clinical phenotype in a CFC patient, and the marked resemblance between CFC and NS, consistent with the suggestion that NS and CFC are variable manifestations of the same entity (36,43). Taking updated molecular findings, reviews of complex genetic heterogeneity and the highly overlapping features of these disorders into consideration, the present review hypothesizes these three disorders may be not distinct and separate conditions, but a continuous spectrum consisting of a certain gene or group of gene-related subtypes with certain degrees of phenotypic variability, particularly KRAS-associated NS-CFC-CS spectrum (as presented in Table I), or multiple alternative underlying mechanisms are involved in the functional dysregulation of the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway.

Allelic syndromes of NF1: Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome and Watson syndrome

The disorder designated neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome (NFNS; OMIM 601321) is a variant of NF1 rather than NS, predominantly due to mutations in the NF1 gene (44). It may fulfill the criteria for NF1 with CALM and skin-fold freckling, but also has overlapping features with NS, including ‘Noonan’ face, short stature, congenital heart defects and a predisposition to malignancy. Watson syndrome (WS; OMIM 193520) is characterized by pulmonic stenosis, CALM and intellectual impairment (45), furthermore, Lisch nodules are observed in the majority of affected subjects, and neurofibromas in ~1/3 (46). An 80-kb deletion and an in-frame tandem duplication of 42 bases at the NF1 locus have been reported in patients with WS (47,48). These findings broaden the noteworthy NF1-associated phenotype spectrum and are consistent with NFNS and WS as allelic disorders or subtypes of NF1. An alternative explanation is that they are the result of an additive effect of mutations in NF1 and other relevant genes, including PTPN11 or unknown modifying loci (49,50).

KITLG/KIT signaling pathway-associated genetic disorders with CALM

Piebaldism

Piebaldism is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by KIT mutations. Characteristic features are depigmented patches of skin and hair (as presented in Fig. 1). Of the three reported piebaldism cases with multiple CALM and intertriginous freckling, all the mutations were located in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain (Gly610Asp, Gliu640Asp and Arg791Gly) (51–53). It has been demonstrated that inadequate phosphorylation of the KIT-binding domain in SPRED1 due to a defective KIT TK would result in loss of inhibition of the Ras⁄MAPK signaling pathway, leading to a phenotype similar to NFLS (53), while gain-of function mutations in KITLG have been reported to result in FPHH (54), indicating KIT and KITLG are important modulators of skin pigmentation.
Figure 1.

Clinical appearance of a piebaldism patient with a KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase mutation.

Phenotypic severity depends on the type and site of the mutation (55,56). Mutations in the TK region (TK1, 582–684 and TK2, 762–973) exert a dominant-negative effect, usually resulting in a severe phenotype, whereas mild cases are frequently due to mutations in the extracellular region. Patients with piebaldism may develop CALM (as presented in Fig. 1), NF1 may be associated with piebaldism, and these two distinct conditions may co-exist in one patient (57,58), which highlights the necessity of molecular diagnosis.

FPHH and FPH

FPHH is notable for progressive, diffuse, partly blotchy hyperpigmented lesions intermingled with scattered hypopigmented spots, lentigines and CALM (as presented in Fig. 2) (6). It is the result of a mutation in KITLG, encoding KITLG involved in the Ras⁄MAPK signaling pathway (54). Clinical signs are somewhat different from its allelic disorder FPH (59), in which no hypopigmentation is present. Notably, the mutation p.Asn36Ser results in FPH and FPHH, with the FPH patient image in a previous study by Wang et al (59) also demonstrating small suspicious hypopigmented lesions (54). This suggests these two disorders may resemble another pigmentary genetic disorder termed Dowling-Degos disease (DDD; OMIM 179850, 615327 and 615696) (60–63), which may also be the same condition with a degree of phenotypic variability, for example, in the distribution of hyperpigmented and hypopigmented lesions.
Figure 2.

Clinical appearance of a familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation patient with a KIT ligand mutation.

Conclusion

The RASopathies have complex genetic heterogeneity and marked overlapping features, however, a relatively correct diagnosis is essential for genetic counseling regarding prognosis (as the diagnosis of milder phenotypes, including NFLS or mosaic NF1, may relieve the psychological burden on serious age-dependent complications); monitoring of potential risks, including cancer and cardiac events; and prevention using prenatal diagnosis. Thus, the current review proposes a screening strategy in which: i) NF1 testing has a priority for patients that only exhibit CALM or fulfill the NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1; ii) SPRED1 and NF1 should be tested in those with skin-fold freckling and a family history; iii) in NF1-negative pediatric patients with CALM and a dispersed pattern of facial and cervical freckles, PTPN11 should be first considered for molecular analysis, as it accounts for the majority of LS and NS cases; iv) genetic testing of KITLG and KIT is used and relatively effective in those with diffuse hyperpigmented lesions intermingled with scattered depigmentation, depigmented patches of skin and hair, respectively (as presented in Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

Screening strategies for inherited disorders with CALM that clinically resemble NF1, particularly those involved in KITLG/KIT and Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. CALM, café-au-lait macules; NF1, neurofibromatosis type 1; KIT, KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase; KITLG, KIT ligand; SPRED1, sprouty related, EVH1 domain containing 1; PTPN11, protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11; NF2, neurofibromatosis type 2; MAS. McCune-Albright syndrome; CMMRDS, constitutional mismatch repair deficiency; NGS, next generation sequencing.

As for other RASopathies, BRAF and HRAS analysis is suitable for relatively typical CFC and CS presentations, respectively. However, when considering the highly overlapping phenotypes and involvement of numerous genes, a custom-designed screening kit including all the candidate genes for the various RASopathies is a thorough alternative choice. Furthermore, few patients with CALM fall outside the above mentioned disorders and their condition may be the result of mutations in other undetected genes associated with the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway, for instance, recently identified causal genes Cbl proto-oncogene E3 ubiquitin protein ligase and Ras-like without CAAX 1 (64,65). Considering the detection limit of general sequencing methods, especially for those atypical or unreported phenotypes, next generation sequencing (such as whole exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing) still serves as a cost-effective approach for molecular diagnosis of the above disorders with CALS, as well as other possible genetic diseases, including neurofibromatosis type 2 (OMIM 101000) with vestibular schwannomas; McCune-Albright syndrome (OMIM 174800) with segmental CALM, polyostotic fibrous dysplasia and precocious puberty; constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (OMIM 276300) with childhood cancer predisposition (66); and various mosaic conditions associated with CALM (as presented in Fig. 3).
  66 in total

1.  Piebaldism and neurofibromatosis type 1: horses of very different colors.

Authors:  Richard A Spritz; Peter H Itin; David H Gutmann
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 2.  Noonan, Costello and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndromes: dysregulation of the Ras-MAPK pathway.

Authors:  William E Tidyman; Katherine A Rauen
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 5.600

3.  Dowling-Degos disease presenting as hypopigmented macules.

Authors:  Tiffany L Pickup; Diya F Mutasim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  More on the Noonan-CFC controversy.

Authors:  G Neri; M Zollino
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1996-10-16

5.  LEOPARD Syndrome: Clinical Features and Gene Mutations.

Authors:  E Martínez-Quintana; F Rodríguez-González
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-08-29

Review 6.  The diagnostic and clinical significance of café-au-lait macules.

Authors:  Kara N Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.278

7.  Dermatological findings in 61 mutation-positive individuals with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome.

Authors:  D H Siegel; J McKenzie; I J Frieden; K A Rauen
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 8.  Piebaldism.

Authors:  Naoki Oiso; Kazuyoshi Fukai; Akira Kawada; Tamio Suzuki
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.005

9.  Germline KRAS mutations cause Noonan syndrome.

Authors:  Suzanne Schubbert; Martin Zenker; Sara L Rowe; Silke Böll; Cornelia Klein; Gideon Bollag; Ineke van der Burgt; Luciana Musante; Vera Kalscheuer; Lars-Erik Wehner; Hoa Nguyen; Brian West; Kam Y J Zhang; Erik Sistermans; Anita Rauch; Charlotte M Niemeyer; Kevin Shannon; Christian P Kratz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-02-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 10.  Molecular basis of human piebaldism.

Authors:  R A Spritz
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 8.551

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Pigmented macules as possible early signs of genetic syndromes].

Authors:  H Hamm; K Emmerich; J Olk
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Treatment of Café-Au-Lait Spots Using Q-Switched Alexandrite Laser: Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of 471 Children in Mainland China.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Yan Chu; Zigang Xu; Yujuan Sun; Li Li; Xiaofeng Han; Chen Wang; Li Wei; Yuanxiang Liu; Lin Ma
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Diagnostic difficulties and possibilities of NF1-like syndromes in childhood.

Authors:  Eva Pinti; Krisztina Nemeth; Krisztina Staub; Anna Lengyel; Gyorgy Fekete; Iren Haltrich
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.125

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.