Literature DB >> 27666331

Genetic variation may explain why females are less susceptible to dental erosion.

Marte-Mari Uhlen1, Kjersti R Stenhagen2, Piper M Dizak3, Børge Holme4, Aida Mulic2, Anne B Tveit2, Alexandre R Vieira3.   

Abstract

Not all individuals at risk for dental erosion (DE) display erosive lesions. The prevalence of DE is higher among male subjects. The occurrence of DE may depend on more than just acidic challenge, with genetics possibly playing a role. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of enamel-formation genes with DE. One premolar and a saliva sample were collected from 90 individuals. Prepared teeth were immersed in 0.01 M HCl (pH 2.2), and enamel loss (μm) was measured using white light interferometry. DNA was extracted from saliva, and 15 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were analysed. Allele and genotype frequencies were related to the enamel loss of the specimens. Single-marker and haplotype analyses were performed using sex as a covariate. Mean enamel loss was higher for male donors than for female donors (P = 0.047). Significant associations were found between enamel loss and amelogenin, X-linked (AMELX), tuftelin 1 (TUFT1), and tuftelin-interacting protein 11 (TFIP11). Analyses showed significant associations between variation in enamel-formation genes and a lower susceptibility to DE in female subjects. The results indicate that susceptibility to DE is influenced by genetic variation, and may, in part, explain why some individuals are more susceptible than others to DE, including differences between female subjects and male subjects.
© 2016 Eur J Oral Sci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  demineralization; dental enamel; disease susceptibility; oral health; tooth erosion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27666331     DOI: 10.1111/eos.12297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  7 in total

1.  Genetic variation may explain why females are less susceptible to dental erosion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Variation in Enamel Formation Genes Influences Enamel Demineralization In Vitro in a Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Model.

Authors:  Liangyue Pang; Qinghui Zhi; Peilin Zhuang; Lixia Yu; Ye Tao; Huancai Lin
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Opinions and Treatment Decisions for Dental Erosive Wear: A Questionnaire Survey among Icelandic Dentists.

Authors:  Aida Mulic; Inga B Árnadòttir; Torbjòrg Jensdottir; Simen E Kopperud
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-11-01

4.  Measuring the Microscopic Structures of Human Dental Enamel Can Predict Caries Experience.

Authors:  Ariana M Kelly; Anna Kallistova; Erika C Küchler; Helena F Romanos; Andrea Lips; Marcelo C Costa; Adriana Modesto; Alexandre R Vieira
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-02-02

5.  Biomarkers for Lifetime Caries-Free Status.

Authors:  Ariana M Kelly; Mariana Bezamat; Adriana Modesto; Alexandre R Vieira
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-12-30

6.  Polymorphisms in Genes of Lipid Metabolism Are Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Periodontitis, as Comorbidities, and with the Subjects' Periodontal, Glycemic, and Lipid Profiles.

Authors:  Ingra G Nicchio; Thamiris Cirelli; Rafael Nepomuceno; Marco A R Hidalgo; Carlos Rossa; Joni A Cirelli; Silvana R P Orrico; Silvana P Barros; Letícia H Theodoro; Raquel M Scarel-Caminaga
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 7.  Genetic Aspects of Dental Erosive Wear and Dental Caries.

Authors:  Amela Tulek; Aida Mulic; Maria Runningen; Jannike Lillemo; Tor Paaske Utheim; Qalbi Khan; Amer Sehic
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.