| Literature DB >> 27665845 |
Oguarabau Benson1, Ivan da Silva2, Stephen P Argent1, Rafel Cabot1, Mathew Savage3, Harry G W Godfrey3, Yong Yan3, Stewart F Parker2, Pascal Manuel2, Matthew J Lennox1, Tamoghna Mitra1,4, Timothy L Easun1,5, William Lewis1, Alexander J Blake1, Elena Besley1, Sihai Yang3, Martin Schröder3.
Abstract
An amide-functionalizedEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27665845 PMCID: PMC5152937 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b08059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Chem Soc ISSN: 0002-7863 Impact factor: 15.419
Figure 1(a) Chemical structure of ligand H2L. (b) Coordination environment of L2– in MFM-136. (c) View along the c-axis of the Kagome lattice in MFM-136. (d) View of the alternate packing of large cages (blue) and small cages (orange) in MFM-136. Views of (e) the large cage and (f) small cage both along the b-axis. Colors: C, black; H, white; O, red; N, blue; Cu, teal.
Figure 2Experimental and simulated adsorption isotherms for CO2 in desolvated MFM-136 at 273 and 298 K.
Figure 3Binding sites of guests in MFM-136 at loadings of 1.8 CO2/Cu(II) and 1.1 CD4/Cu(II) elucidated from Rietveld refinement of NPD data. Colors: carbon, black; hydrogen, white; oxygen, red; nitrogen, blue; copper, teal; CO2/CD4 guests, purple/dark blue/green for sites A/B/C, respectively. Refined chemical occupancies of guest molecules inset.
Figure 4(a) Overlay of the INS spectra for bare and CO2-loaded MFM-136; (b) difference INS spectrum for the bare and CO2-loaded MFM-136.