Literature DB >> 27665216

A qualitative study of how caseload midwifery is experienced by couples in Denmark.

Ingrid Jepsen1, Edith Mark2, Maralyn Foureur3, Ellen A Nøhr4, Erik E Sørensen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Caseload midwifery is expanding in Denmark. There is a need for elaborating in-depth, how caseload midwifery influences the partner and the woman during childbirth and how this model of care influences the early phases of labour. AIM: To follow, explore and elaborate women's and their partner's experiences of caseload midwifery.
METHODS: Phenomenology of practice was the analytical approach. The methodology was inspired by ethnography, and applied methods were field observations followed by interviews. Ten couples participated in the study. Most of the couples were observed from the onset of labour until childbirth. Afterwards, the couples were interviewed.
FINDINGS: The transition from home to hospital in early labour was experienced as positive. During birth, the partner felt involved and included by the midwife. The midwives remembered and recognized the couple's stories and wishes for childbirth and therefore they felt regarded as "more than numbers". Irrespective of different kinds of vulnerability or challenges among the participants, the relationship was named a professional friendship, characterised by equality and inclusiveness. One drawback of caseload midwifery was that the woman was at risk of being disappointed if her expectations of having a known midwife at birth were not fulfilled. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of women and their partners, attending caseload midwifery meant being recognised and cared for as an individual. The partner felt included and acknowledged and experienced working in a team with the midwife. Caseload midwifery was able to solve problems concerning labour onset or gaining access to the labour ward.
Copyright © 2016 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caseload midwifery; Continuity of care; Participants’ experiences; Qualitative research; The partners’ role

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27665216     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  3 in total

1.  Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ingrid Jepsen; Svend Juul; Maralyn Jean Foureur; Erik Elgaard Sørensen; Ellen Aagaard Nohr
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  The midwifery-led care model: a continuity of care model in the birth path.

Authors:  Alba Ricchi; Franco Rossi; Patrizia Borgognoni; Maria Chiara Bassi; Giovanna Artioli; Chiara Foa; Isabella Neri
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-07-08

3.  Partners' expectations and experiences of the project 'Midwife All the Way': A qualitative study.

Authors:  Birgitta Larsson; Li Thies-Lagergren
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-06-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.