Literature DB >> 27665137

Practices for the disbudding and dehorning of dairy calves by veterinarians and dairy producers in Ontario, Canada.

Charlotte B Winder1, Stephen J LeBlanc1, Derek B Haley1, Kerry D Lissemore1, M Ann Godkin2, Todd F Duffield3.   

Abstract

Disbudding and dehorning dairy calves is very common, despite the introduction of polled genetics to most dairy breeds. Appropriate pain-control practices for these procedures affect both calf welfare and public perception of the dairy industry. Previously published work has shown that North American dairy producers have not widely adopted use of these medications for disbudding or dehorning. However, since the last published work examining these practices in Canada, changes regarding awareness, availability, and future requirements for pain control have occurred in the industry. With this in mind, online and telephone surveys of both veterinarians (n=238) and dairy producers (n=603) in Ontario, Canada, were conducted in the fall of 2014 with a goal of describing current disbudding and dehorning practices and examining factors associated with the adoption of pain control use. Approximately three-quarters of dairy producers reported performing disbudding or dehorning themselves, whereas the remainder used a veterinarian or technician. Almost all (97%) of the veterinarians surveyed reported using local anesthetic, 62% used sedation, and 48% used a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Producer use of local anesthetic was 62%, 38% used sedation and 24% used a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Seventy-eight percent of veterinarian disbudding or dehorning was done before 8wk of age, whereas 64% of dairy producers performed this procedure before 8wk of age. Seventy-two percent of veterinarians and 63% of producers reported changing their disbudding or dehorning practices over the past 10 yr; of producers that changed their practices, 73% cited their herd veterinarian as influential. The use of pain control described in these surveys is higher than previously reported in Ontario. Identification of factors associated with best practices, or the lack of adoption of these practices, may help veterinarians target appropriate educational opportunities for their dairy clients.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calves; dehorning; disbudding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27665137     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of an online learning module to hands-on training in teaching a cautery disbudding technique for dairy calves including cornual nerve block application.

Authors:  Charlotte B Winder; Stephen J LeBlanc; Derek B Haley; Kerry D Lissemore; M Ann Godkin; Todd F Duffield
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Producer and Veterinarian Perspectives towards Pain Management Practices in the US Cattle Industry.

Authors:  Ivelisse Robles; Andreia G Arruda; Emma Nixon; Elizabeth Johnstone; Brooklyn Wagner; Lily Edwards-Callaway; Ronald Baynes; Johann Coetzee; Monique Pairis-Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  An Investigation into the Perceptions of Veterinarians towards Calf Welfare in New Zealand.

Authors:  Ria van Dyke; Amy Miele; Melanie Connor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  A deletion at the polled PC locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle.

Authors:  Sadie L Hennig; Joseph R Owen; Jason C Lin; Bret R McNabb; Alison L Van Eenennaam; James D Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Ontario Dairy Producers' Perceived Barriers and Motivations to the Use of Pain Control for Disbudding and Dehorning Calves: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Julia Saraceni; David L Renaud; Erin Nelson; Jennifer M C Van Os; Cynthia Miltenburg; Charlotte B Winder
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Assessing the affective component of pain, and the efficacy of pain control, using conditioned place aversion in calves.

Authors:  Thomas Ede; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Pessimistic dairy calves are more vulnerable to pain-induced anhedonia.

Authors:  Benjamin Lecorps; Emeline Nogues; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An Investigation into the Perceptions of Veterinarians towards Perioperative Pain Management in Calves.

Authors:  Ria van Dyke; Melanie Connor; Amy Miele
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Applied Animal Ethics in Industrial Food Animal Production: Exploring the Role of the Veterinarian.

Authors:  Elein Hernandez; Pol Llonch; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.