Literature DB >> 27665124

From science to action: Principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making.

C Cvitanovic1, J McDonald2, A J Hobday3.   

Abstract

Effective conservation requires knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to enable learning and support evidence-based decision-making. Efforts to improve knowledge exchange have been hindered by a paucity of empirically-grounded guidance to help scientists and practitioners design and implement research programs that actively facilitate knowledge exchange. To address this, we evaluated the Ningaloo Research Program (NRP), which was designed to generate new scientific knowledge to support evidence-based decisions about the management of the Ningaloo Marine Park in north-western Australia. Specifically, we evaluated (1) outcomes of the NRP, including the extent to which new knowledge informed management decisions; (2) the barriers that prevented knowledge exchange among scientists and managers; (3) the key requirements for improving knowledge exchange processes in the future; and (4) the core capacities that are required to support knowledge exchange processes. While the NRP generated expansive and multidisciplinary science outputs directly relevant to the management of the Ningaloo Marine Park, decision-makers are largely unaware of this knowledge and little has been integrated into decision-making processes. A range of barriers prevented efficient and effective knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers including cultural differences among the groups, institutional barriers within decision-making agencies, scientific outputs that were not translated for decision-makers and poor alignment between research design and actual knowledge needs. We identify a set of principles to be implemented routinely as part of any applied research program, including; (i) stakeholder mapping prior to the commencement of research programs to identify all stakeholders, (ii) research questions to be co-developed with stakeholders, (iii) implementation of participatory research approaches, (iv) use of a knowledge broker, and (v) tailored knowledge management systems. Finally, we articulate the individual, institutional and financial capacities that must be developed to underpin successful knowledge exchange strategies.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Core capacities; Knowledge broker; Knowledge management; Leadership; Participatory research; Stakeholder mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27665124     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  15 in total

1.  Bridging the divide between scientists and decision-makers: how behavioural ecologists can increase the conservation impact of their research?

Authors:  Sarah M Durant; Rosemary Groom; Bernard Kuloba; Abdoulkarim Samna; Uakendisa Muzuma; Phemelo Gadimang; Rose Mandisodza-Chikerema; Audrey Ipavec; Nicholas Mitchell; Dennis Ikanda; Maurus Msuha
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Costs and Benefits of Delaying Remediation on Ecological Resources at Contaminated Sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  How Decision Support Systems Can Benefit from a Theory of Change Approach.

Authors:  Will Allen; Jennyffer Cruz; Bruce Warburton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice.

Authors:  Ida Nadia S Djenontin; Alison M Meadow
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship.

Authors:  Carl Folke; Henrik Österblom; Jean-Baptiste Jouffray; Eric F Lambin; W Neil Adger; Marten Scheffer; Beatrice I Crona; Magnus Nyström; Simon A Levin; Stephen R Carpenter; John M Anderies; Stuart Chapin; Anne-Sophie Crépin; Alice Dauriach; Victor Galaz; Line J Gordon; Nils Kautsky; Brian H Walker; James R Watson; James Wilen; Aart de Zeeuw
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 6.  Bridging research and practice in conservation.

Authors:  Andrew N Kadykalo; Rachel T Buxton; Peter Morrison; Christine M Anderson; Holly Bickerton; Charles M Francis; Adam C Smith; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 7.563

7.  From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Charlotte C Poot; Rianne M van der Kleij; Evelyn A Brakema; Debbie Vermond; Siân Williams; Liza Cragg; Jos M van den Broek; Niels H Chavannes
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.341

8.  Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners' perspectives.

Authors:  A T Bednarek; C Wyborn; C Cvitanovic; R Meyer; R M Colvin; P F E Addison; S L Close; K Curran; M Farooque; E Goldman; D Hart; H Mannix; B McGreavy; A Parris; S Posner; C Robinson; M Ryan; P Leith
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 6.367

9.  Building optimism at the environmental science-policy-practice interface through the study of bright spots.

Authors:  Christopher Cvitanovic; Alistair J Hobday
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Physiology can contribute to better understanding, management, and conservation of coral reef fishes.

Authors:  Björn Illing; Jodie L Rummer
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.