Literature DB >> 27664820

Usefulness of quality indicators for antibiotic use: case study for the Netherlands.

Alike W van der Velden1, Monique Roukens2, Ewoudt van de Garde3, Marco Lourens4, Stephanie Natsch2.   

Abstract

QUALITY PROBLEM: Inappropriate antibiotic use drives development of antimicrobial resistance. Worldwide, guideline adherence for antibiotic treatment of infectious disease is far from optimal. Insight in prescribing quality is pivotal for healthcare professionals and policy makers to intervene appropriately. INITIAL ASSESSMENTS: European countries uniformly monitor antibiotic use, which is reported yearly by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Unfortunately, this has not had enough impact to decrease prescribing and resistance levels. CHOICE OF SOLUTION: Quality indicators (QIs) could provide better insight in prescribing quality and enable benchmarking to other countries; this could trigger action to improve antimicrobial prescribing. European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) proposed 12 antibiotic QIs. IMPLEMENTATION: Trends in use of antibiotic subgroups and the 12 ESAC QI values were determined for Dutch primary care (2004-2013); outcomes were compared to other European countries. Dutch antibiotic use is low within the European context. Nitrofurantoin use is higher than the European average, use of small-spectrum antibiotics lowers. Use of macrolides, quinolones and amoxicillin/clavulanate declined, which was not supported by the broad/narrow QI results. EVALUATION: QIs expressing antibiotic subgroup use in Defined Daily Doses/1000 inhabitants/day, particularly small-spectrum and non-first choices, provide proper insight in prescribing quality and are useful for benchmarking purposes. QIs measuring percentages were not considered useful. The broad/narrow ratio could be more informative when adjusted to national guidelines, or when more antibiotic subgroups are included based on better European consensus. LESSONS LEARNT: Benchmarking the above mentioned Dutch QI values to other countries provides direction for three specific strategies to further improve Dutch antibiotic prescribing practice.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, prescribing; antimicrobials; outpatient use; policy; quality indicators

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27664820     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  4 in total

1.  Quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in general practice: a RAND Appropriateness Method.

Authors:  Laura Trolle Saust; Lars Bjerrum; Magnus Arpi; Malene Plejdrup Hansen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Characterisation of antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory tract infections in Danish general practice: a retrospective registry based cohort study.

Authors:  Rune Aabenhus; Malene Plejdrup Hansen; Laura Trolle Saust; Lars Bjerrum
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.871

3.  Effects of restrictive-prescribing stewardship on antibiotic consumption in primary care in China: an interrupted time series analysis, 2012-2017.

Authors:  Xuemei Wang; Yuqing Tang; Chenxi Liu; Junjie Liu; Youwen Cui; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Development of key quality indicators for appropriate antibiotic use in the Republic of Korea: results of a modified Delphi survey.

Authors:  Bongyoung Kim; Myung Jin Lee; Se Yoon Park; Song Mi Moon; Kyoung-Ho Song; Tae Hyong Kim; Eu Suk Kim; Hong Bin Kim
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.887

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.