Literature DB >> 27664196

In ovo validation model to assess the efficacy of commercial prebiotics on broiler performance and oxidative stability of meat.

Giuseppe Maiorano1, Katarzyna Stadnicka2, Siria Tavaniello3, Cinzia Abiuso3, Joanna Bogucka2, Marek Bednarczyk2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of in ovo injection of 2 different prebiotics, DiNovo (DN; Laminaria spp., extract containing laminarin and fucoidan) and Bi2tos (BI; non-digestive trans-galactooligosaccharides from milk lactose digested with Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171), on growth, slaughter traits, intramuscular fat percentage (IF) and muscle fiber diameter, and lipid oxidation of meat in chickens reared under commercial conditions, following an in ovo trial protocol. On d 12 of embryonic incubation, 350,560 Ross 308 eggs were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and automatically injected in ovo with: physiological saline (control group), BI at dose of 3.5 mg/embryo and DN at dose of 0.88 mg/embryo. Hatched chicks (males and females) were allocated dependent on treatment group into 3 poultry houses on each farm (3 farms in total) with a stocking density of 21.2 to 21.5 chicks/m2 At 42 d of age, 14 randomly chosen birds (7 males and 7 females), per each treatment from each farm, were individually weighed and slaughtered. The results showed no significant differences of final number of chickens/chicken house, mortality, BW per treatment, stocking density (kg/m2), feed intake, feed conversion rate (FCR), and European Broiler Index among 3 experimental groups. Treatments with BI and DN were associated with slight increases (P > 0.05) in average BW and a minor improvement (P > 0.05) of FCR in BI group. Slaughtered chickens from DN and BI treated groups had significantly increase of BW, carcass weight, carcass yield, and breast muscle weight compared with the control group. IF and muscle fiber diameter were similar among groups. Males had significantly higher slaughter traits compared to females, except for breast muscle yield. The prebiotic treatments led to a higher lipid oxidation in meat, even if the detected TBA reactive substances were below the critical value recognized for meat acceptability. In conclusion, in ovo administration of prebiotics was associated with improvements in a number of parameters of relevance to commercial poultry production.
© 2016 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chickens; in ovo technology; lipid oxidation; performance traits; prebiotics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27664196     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Herbal Additives for Poultry Feed on the Fatty Acid Profile of Meat.

Authors:  Karolina Jachimowicz; Anna Winiarska-Mieczan; Ewa Tomaszewska
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  The In Ovo Feeding Administration (Gallus Gallus)-An Emerging In Vivo Approach to Assess Bioactive Compounds with Potential Nutritional Benefits.

Authors:  Tao Hou; Elad Tako
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Modulation of microbial communities and mucosal gene expression in chicken intestines after galactooligosaccharides delivery In Ovo.

Authors:  Anna Slawinska; Aleksandra Dunislawska; Arkadiusz Plowiec; Malgorzata Radomska; Jagoda Lachmanska; Maria Siwek; Siria Tavaniello; Giuseppe Maiorano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides on physico-chemical indices, antioxidant and oxidative stability of broiler chicken meat.

Authors:  Avishek Biswas; Namit Mohan; Kapil Dev; Nasir Akbar Mir; Ashok Kumar Tiwari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of in ovo delivered xylo- and mannan- oligosaccharides on growth performance, intestinal immunity, cecal short-chain fatty acids, and cecal microbiota of broilers.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Singh; Utsav Prakash Tiwari; Birendra Mishra; Rajesh Jha
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  Soybean vs. Pea Bean in the Diet of Medium-Growing Broiler Chickens Raised under Semi-Intensive Conditions of Inner Mediterranean Areas: Growth Performance and Environmental Impact.

Authors:  Antonella Fatica; Francesco Fantuz; Mengjun Wu; Siria Tavaniello; Giuseppe Maiorano; Elisabetta Salimei
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Effects of dietary supplementation with a laminarin-rich extract on the growth performance and gastrointestinal health in broilers.

Authors:  B Venardou; J V O'Doherty; S Vigors; C J O'Shea; E J Burton; M T Ryan; T Sweeney
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition.

Authors:  Paulina Markowiak; Katarzyna Śliżewska
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.181

9.  Effects of replacing dietary Aureomycin with a combination of plant essential oils on production performance and gastrointestinal health of broilers.

Authors:  Fuguang Xue; Lei Shi; Yunlei Li; Aixin Ni; Hui Ma; Yanyan Sun; Jilan Chen
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Chicken Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Applications: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Andrea Svoradova; Vladimir Zmrhal; Eva Venusova; Petr Slama
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.