Literature DB >> 27664111

Electro-physiological changes in the brain induced by caffeine or glucose nasal spray.

K De Pauw1, B Roelands1,2, J Van Cutsem1, U Marusic3, T Torbeyns1, R Meeusen4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A direct link between the mouth cavity and the brain for glucose (GLUC) and caffeine (CAF) has been established. The aim of this study is to determine whether a direct link for both substrates also exist between the nasal cavity and the brain.
METHODS: Ten healthy male subjects (age 22 ± 1 years) performed three experimental trials, separated by at least 2 days. Each trial included a 20-s nasal spray (NAS) period in which solutions placebo (PLAC), GLUC, or CAF were provided in a double-blind, randomized order. During each trial, four cognitive Stroop tasks were performed: two familiarization trials and one pre- and one post-NAS trial. Reaction times and accuracy for different stimuli (neutral, NEUTR; congruent, CON; incongruent INCON) were determined. Electroencephalography was continuously measured throughout the trials. During the Stroop tasks pre- and post-NAS, the P300 was assessed and during NAS, source localization was performed using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: NAS activated the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). CAF-NAS also increased θ and β activity in frontal cortices. Furthermore, GLUC-NAS increased the β activity within the insula. GLUC-NAS also increased the P300 amplitude with INCON (P = 0.046) and reduced P300 amplitude at F3-F4 and P300 latency at CP1-CP2-Cz with NEUTR (P = 0.001 and P = 0.016, respectively). The existence of nasal bitter and sweet taste receptors possibly induce these brain responses.
CONCLUSION: Greater cognitive efficiency was observed with GLUC-NAS. CAF-NAS activated cingulate, insular, and sensorymotor cortices, whereas GLUC-NAS activated sensory, cingulate, and insular cortices. However, no effect on the Stroop task was found.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; EEG; ERP P300; Source localization; Stroop; sLORETA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27664111     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4435-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  63 in total

1.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: a systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks.

Authors:  Katherine L Roberts; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice.

Authors:  A Gevins; M E Smith; L McEvoy; D Yu
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Effects of repeated doses of caffeine on mood and performance of alert and fatigued volunteers.

Authors:  Andrew Smith; David Sutherland; Gary Christopher
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.153

5.  Effects of caffeine and maltodextrin mouth rinsing on P300, brain imaging, and cognitive performance.

Authors:  K De Pauw; B Roelands; K Knaepen; M Polfliet; J Stiens; R Meeusen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-01-22

6.  The effect of caffeine ingestion on skill maintenance and fatigue in epee fencers.

Authors:  Lindsay Bottoms; Andrew Greenhalgh; Kim Gregory
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Blood glucose influences memory and attention in young adults.

Authors:  D Benton; D S Owens; P Y Parker
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Caffeine, fatigue, and cognition.

Authors:  Monicque M Lorist; Mattie Tops
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Glucose improvement of memory: a review.

Authors:  Claude Messier
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  Motile cilia of human airway epithelia are chemosensory.

Authors:  Alok S Shah; Yehuda Ben-Shahar; Thomas O Moninger; Joel N Kline; Michael J Welsh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance.

Authors:  Nanci S Guest; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Michael T Nelson; Jozo Grgic; Brad J Schoenfeld; Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Shawn M Arent; Jose Antonio; Jeffrey R Stout; Eric T Trexler; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Erica R Goldstein; Douglas S Kalman; Bill I Campbell
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  How to Tackle Mental Fatigue: A Systematic Review of Potential Countermeasures and Their Underlying Mechanisms.

Authors:  Matthias Proost; Jelle Habay; Jonas De Wachter; Kevin De Pauw; Ben Rattray; Romain Meeusen; Bart Roelands; Jeroen Van Cutsem
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 3.  Administration of Caffeine in Alternate Forms.

Authors:  Kate A Wickham; Lawrence L Spriet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Cognitive Performance Enhancement Induced by Caffeine, Carbohydrate and Guarana Mouth Rinsing during Submaximal Exercise.

Authors:  Laura Pomportes; Jeanick Brisswalter; Laurence Casini; Arnaud Hays; Karen Davranche
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 5.  Caffeine and Exercise: What Next?

Authors:  Craig Pickering; Jozo Grgic
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.