Literature DB >> 27664037

Ethics support in community care makes a difference for practice.

Morten Magelssen1, Elisabeth Gjerberg1, Lillian Lillemoen1, Reidun Førde1, Reidar Pedersen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Through the Norwegian ethics project, ethics activities have been implemented in the health and care sector in more than 200 municipalities.
OBJECTIVES: To study outcomes of the ethics activities and examine which factors promote and inhibit significance and sustainability of the activities. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Two online questionnaires about the municipal ethics activities. Participants and research context: A total of 137 municipal contact persons for the ethics project answered the first survey (55% response rate), whereas 217 ethics facilitators responded to the second survey (33% response rate). Ethical considerations: Based on informed consent, the study was approved by the Data Protection Official of the Norwegian Social Science Data Services.
FINDINGS: Around half of the respondents found the ethics project to have been highly significant for daily professional practice. Outcomes include better handling of ethical challenges, better employee cooperation, better service quality, and better relations to patients and next of kin. Factors associated with sustainability and/or significance of the activities were sufficient support from stakeholders, sufficient available time, and ethics facilitators having sufficient knowledge and skills in ethics and access to supervision. DISCUSSION: This study shows that ethics initiatives can be both sustainable and significant for practice. There is a need to create regional or national structures for follow-up and develop more comprehensive ethics training for ethics facilitators.
CONCLUSION: It is both possible and potentially important to implement clinical ethics support activities in community health and care services systematically on a large scale. Future ethics initiatives in the community sector should be designed in light of documented promoting and inhibiting factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care of the older person; clinical ethics; community care; moral/ethical climate of organizations; primary health practice

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27664037     DOI: 10.1177/0969733016667774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Marina Salis; Eryn Tong; Erica Nekolaichuk; Claudia Barned; Andria Bianchi; Daniel Z Buchman; Kevin Rodrigues; Ruby R Shanker; Ann M Heesters
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.834

2.  The Norwegian national project for ethics support in community health and care services.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Elisabeth Gjerberg; Reidar Pedersen; Reidun Førde; Lillian Lillemoen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 3.  Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Dara Rasoal; Kirsti Skovdahl; Mervyn Gifford; Annica Kihlgren
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-12

4.  The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals.

Authors:  Marit Helene Hem; Bert Molewijk; Elisabeth Gjerberg; Lillian Lillemoen; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Implementing ethics reflection groups in hospitals: an action research study evaluating barriers and promotors.

Authors:  Henriette Bruun; Reidar Pedersen; Elsebeth Stenager; Christian Backer Mogensen; Lotte Huniche
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  'Ethics Between the Lines' - Nurses' Experiences of Ethical Challenges in Long-Term Care.

Authors:  Hilde Munkeby; Aud Moe; Grete Bratberg; Siri A Devik
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  Norwegian Nurses' Reflections Upon Experiences of Ethical Challenges in Older People Care: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Linda Rykkje; Anne Lise Holm; Marit Helene Hem
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-11-29

8.  Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice.

Authors:  H Bruun; L Huniche; E Stenager; C B Mogensen; R Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Implementing clinical ethics committees as a complex intervention: presentation of a feasibility study in community care.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Heidi Karlsen; Reidar Pedersen; Lisbeth Thoresen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Safe and competent nursing care: An argument for a minimum standard?

Authors:  Siri Tønnessen; Anne Scott; Per Nortvedt
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.874

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.