| Literature DB >> 27663968 |
Kota Kurisu1, Takeo Abumiya2, Masaki Ito1, Masayuki Gekka1, Toshiya Osanai1, Hideo Shichinohe1, Naoki Nakayama1, Ken Kazumata1, Kiyohiro Houkin1.
Abstract
The robust neuroprotective effects of transarterial regional hypothermia have been demonstrated in the typical transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) model, but have not yet been tested in other ischemic stroke models, even though clinical ischemic conditions are diverse. In order to clarify these effects in a different ischemic stroke model, we employed a rat model of permanent MCAO (pMCAO) with transient collateral hypoperfusion (tCHP), which was achieved by direct MCA ligation through craniotomy and 1-h bilateral common carotid artery occlusion at the beginning of pMCAO. The infusion of 20ml/kg of 4°C cold saline (CS) or 37°C warm saline (WS) into the ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) was performed for 15min in intra- or post-tCHP. Neurological scores, infarct/edema volumes, and neuronal apoptosis and reactive gliosis were compared between the CS and WS groups and a non-infusion control group after 48h of reperfusion. Although brain temperatures were only reduced by 2-3°C for 15min, the CS group had significantly better neurological scores, smaller infarct/edema volumes, and less penumbral neuronal apoptosis and reactive gliosis than the control and WS groups. The post-tCHP CS group exhibited prominent neuroprotective effects, even though infarct volumes and neuronal apoptosis were reduced less than those in the intra-tCHP CS group. In conclusion, we demonstrated the neuroprotective effects of transarterial regional hypothermia in an ischemic model of pMCAO with tCHP. Even though MCAO is persistent, cold infusion via the ICA is neuroprotective for the penumbra, suggesting the wider therapeutic application of this therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Gliosis; Hypothermia; Partial reperfusion injury; Permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion; Transarterial regional hypothermia
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27663968 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.09.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN: 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252