Literature DB >> 27663606

A novel approach for left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Intraprocedural integration of coronary venous electroanatomic mapping with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Uyên Châu Nguyên1, Masih Mafi-Rad2, Jean-Paul Aben3, Martijn W Smulders2, Elien B Engels4, Antonius M W van Stipdonk2, Justin G L M Luermans2, Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers2, Frits W Prinzen4, Kevin Vernooy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Placing the left ventricular (LV) lead at a site of late electrical activation remote from scar is desired to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to integrate coronary venous electroanatomic mapping (EAM) with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) enabling LV lead guidance to the latest activated vein remote from scar.
METHODS: Eighteen CRT candidates with focal scar on DE-CMR were prospectively included. DE-CMR images were semi-automatically analyzed. Coronary venous EAM was performed intraprocedurally and integrated with DE-CMR to guide LV lead placement in real time. Image integration accuracy and electrogram parameters were evaluated offline.
RESULTS: Integration of EAM and DE-CMR was achieved using 8.9 ± 2.8 anatomic landmarks and with accuracy of 4.7 ± 1.1 mm (mean ± SD). Maximal electrical delay ranged between 72 and 197ms (57%-113% of QRS duration) and was heterogeneously located among individuals. In 12 patients, the latest activated vein was located outside scar, and placing the LV lead in the latest activated vein remote from scar was accomplished in 10 patients and prohibited in 2 patients. In the other 6 patients, the latest activated vein was located in scar, and targeting alternative veins was considered. Unipolar voltages were on average lower in scar compared to nonscar (6.71 ± 3.45 mV vs 8.18 ± 4.02 mV [median ± interquartile range), P <.001) but correlated weakly with DE-CMR scar extent (R -0.161, P <.001) and varied widely among individual patients.
CONCLUSION: Integration of coronary venous EAM with DE-CMR can be used during CRT implantation to guide LV lead placement to the latest activated vein remote from scar, possibly improving CRT.
Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance; Electroanatomic mapping; Left ventricular lead placement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663606     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  6 in total

1.  Utility of dual-source computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy-DIRECT study.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Jackie Szymonifka; Michael H Picard; Wai-Ee Thai; Bryan Wai; Jim W Cheung; E Kevin Heist; Udo Hoffmann; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Surface electrogram-guided left ventricular lead placement improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Abdulcebbar Şipal; Serdar Bozyel; Müjdat Aktaş; Emir Derviş; Tayyar Akbulut; Onur Argan; Umut Çelikyurt; Dilek Ural; Tayfun Şahin; Ayşen Ağır; Ahmet Vural
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  A rule-based method for predicting the electrical activation of the heart with cardiac resynchronization therapy from non-invasive clinical data.

Authors:  A W C Lee; U C Nguyen; O Razeghi; J Gould; B S Sidhu; B Sieniewicz; J Behar; M Mafi-Rad; G Plank; F W Prinzen; C A Rinaldi; K Vernooy; S Niederer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  3-Dimensional ventricular electrical activation pattern assessed from a novel high-frequency electrocardiographic imaging technique: principles and clinical importance.

Authors:  Pavel Jurak; Laura R Bear; Uyên Châu Nguyên; Ivo Viscor; Petr Andrla; Filip Plesinger; Josef Halamek; Vlastimil Vondra; Emma Abell; Matthijs J M Cluitmans; Rémi Dubois; Karol Curila; Pavel Leinveber; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Which information is useful for the arrhythmologist?

Authors:  Elia De Maria; Annachiara Aldrovandi; Ambra Borghi; Letizia Modonesi; Stefano Cappelli
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-26

6.  Evaluation of the use of unipolar voltage amplitudes for detection of myocardial scar assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Uyên Châu Nguyên; Francesco Maffessanti; Masih Mafi-Rad; Giulio Conte; Stef Zeemering; François Regoli; Maria Luce Caputo; Antonius M W van Stipdonk; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Daniel Suerder; Tiziano Moccetti; Rolf Krause; Frits W Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.