| Literature DB >> 27663514 |
Pierre-Olivier Delpech1,2, Raphael Thuillier2,3,4,5, Thibault SaintYves6, Jerome Danion7, Sylvain Le Pape2,4, Edwin S van Amersfoort8, Beatrijs Oortwijn8, Gilles Blancho9, Thierry Hauet10,11,12,13,14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) induced immune response is a critical issue in transplantation. Complement and contact system activation are among its key mechanisms. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Complement system proteins; Drug evaluation; Ischemia; Kidney transplantation; Preclinical; Reperfusion injury
Year: 2016 PMID: 27663514 PMCID: PMC5035455 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-1013-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Early outcome: function and tubular necrosis. a, b Evolution of serum creatinine in the first 2 weeks post-transplant. Serial blood samples were collected from transplanted pigs and processed for biochemical analysis. a serum creatinine levels profiles in both groups. b Area under the curve comparison between the two groups. c Urinary Ngal levels during the first week post reperfusion. Serial samples were collected and levels of Ngal evaluated with an ELISA technique. Reference value for CTL is CTL: 700 ± 6 pg/mL. d Plasma levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) evaluated by IFCC procedure with pyridoxal phosphate. Shown are mean ± SD, n = 7. Statistics: *p < 0.05. AUC data was normally distributed and had equal variance, hence parametric analysis was performed
Fig. 2Chronic function. Evolution of serum creatinine at months 1 and 3 of post-transplant follow up. Shown are mean ± SEM, n = 7. Statistics: *p < 0.05. Serum creatinine values at M1 and M3 were normally distributed but did not show equality of variance on the Modified-Levene Equal-Variance Test, hence non parametric analysis was performed
Fig. 3Chronic fibrosis development at 3 months follow up. Pigs were euthanized after 3 months follow up and kidney biopsies were collected and processed for immunohistochemical analysis. Sirius Red labelling and quantification was performed. a Representative staining for each group in the cortex (C) and corticomedullar (CM) areas. b quantification of the area covered by the staining per high powered field (×100). Shown are mean ± SD, n = 7. Statistics: *p < 0.05. Fibrosis data were normally distributed and had equal variance, hence parametric analysis was performed
Fig. 4Immunohistochemical staining on 3 months post-transplant kidney samples: Immune cell infiltration. Pigs were euthanized after 3 months follow up and kidney biopsies were collected and processed for immunohistochemical analysis. a MAC-387 staining, detecting macrophages in the pig. Left and middle representative staining for each group. Arrows designate positive cells. Magnification: ×100. Right quantification of the number of positive cells per high powered field (×100). b CD3 staining, specific for T lymphocytes. Left and middle representative staining for each group. Arrows designate positive cells. Magnification: ×100. Right quantification of the number of positive cells per high powered field (×100). Shown are mean ± SD, n = 7. Statistics: *p < 0.05. MAC-387 data were normally distributed but did not show equality of variance on the Variance-Ratio Equal-Variance Test, hence non parametric analysis was performed. CD3 data was normally distributed and had equal variance, hence parametric analysis was performed
Fig. 5Immunohistochemical staining on 3 months post-transplant kidney samples. Pigs were euthanized after 3 months follow up and kidney biopsies were collected and processed for immunohistochemical analysis. a Vimentin staining, specific for EMT. Left and middle representative staining for each group. Magnification: ×100. Right quantification of the area covered by the staining per high powered field (×100). b α-SMA staining, specific for EMT. Left and middle representative staining for each group. Magnification: ×100. Right quantification of the area covered by the staining per high powered field (×100). c Western blot analysis of TGF-β signaling; top: representative blots for each marker; bottom: quantification of the signal normalized to β-actin. Shown are mean ± SD, n = 7. Statistics: *p < 0.05. Vimentin staining data were normally distributed but did not show equality of variance on the Variance-Ratio Equal-Variance Test, hence non parametric analysis was performed. α-SMA staining data were normally distributed and had equal variance, hence parametric analysis was performed. TGF-β protein level values were normally distributed but did not show equality of variance on the Variance-Ratio Equal-Variance Test, hence non parametric analysis was performed. P-Smad3/Smad3 ratio values were normally distributed and had equal variance, hence parametric analysis was performed
Fig. 6Immunofluorescent evaluation of complement deposition in kidney biopsies at 30 min post-transplant: C4d, MASP and MBL. Needle biopsies were performed 30 min after unclamping (45 min post injection) and processed for cryopreservation. Slides were evaluated by fluorescent microscopy by a trained nephropathologist. CTL: Healthy kidney; Vehicle (VEH): injected with vehicle 15 min before unclamping; rhC1INH: Injected with 500 U/kg rhC1INH 15 min before unclamping (n = 7). a Representative staining for C4d; top row glomerular staining; bottom row tubular staining. b Representative staining for MASP. c Representative staining for MBL. Magnification: ×200
Semi-quantitative evaluation of complement staining 30 min post-reperfusion
| CTL | VEH | rhC1INH | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1q | Glomeruli | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| Vessels | + | + | + | |
| C3c | Mesengium | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Glomerular capillary wall | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| Apex proximal tubules | – | +++ | +++ | |
| C4d | Glomeruli | +++ | +++++ | +++ |
| Peritubular capillaries | ++ | ++++ | ++ | |
| MASP | Tubular basal membrane | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| MBL | Intratubular | + | + | ± |
| C5b-9 | No staining | No staining | No staining | |
| Factor B | No staining | No staining | No staining |
Needle biopsies were performed 30 min after unclamping (45 min post injection) and processed for cryopreservation. Slides were evaluated by fluorescence microscopy by a trained nephropathologist
Fig. 7Immunofluorescent evaluation of complement deposition in kidney biopsies at 30 min post-transplant: C1q and C3c. Needle biopsies were performed 30 min after unclamping (45 min post injection) and processed for cryopreservation. Slides were evaluated by fluorescent microscopy by a trained nephropathologist. CTL: Healthy kidney; Vehicle (VEH): injected with vehicle 15 min before unclamping; rhC1INH: Injected with 500 U/kg rhC1INH 15 min before unclamping (n = 7). a Representative staining for C1q; top row vessel staining; bottom row glomerular staining. b Representative staining for C3c; top row glomerular staining; bottom row tubular staining. Magnification: ×200