Literature DB >> 27663459

Variation in Guideline Concordant Active Surveillance Followup in Diverse Urology Practices.

Amy N Luckenbaugh1, Gregory B Auffenberg1, Scott R Hawken1, Apoorv Dhir1, Susan Linsell1, Sanjeev Kaul1, David C Miller2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the frequency of followup prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy among men treated with active surveillance in the academic and community urology practices comprising MUSIC (Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MUSIC is a consortium of 42 practices that maintains a prospective clinical registry with validated clinical data on all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at participating sites. We identified all patients in MUSIC practices who entered active surveillance and had at least 2 years of continuous followup. After determining the frequency of repeat prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy, we calculated rates of concordance with NCCN Guidelines® recommendations (ie at least 3 prostate specific antigen tests and 1 surveillance biopsy) collaborative-wide and across individual practices.
RESULTS: We identified 513 patients who entered active surveillance from January 2012 through September 2013 and had at least 2 years of followup. Among the 431 men (84%) who remained on active surveillance for 2 years 132 (30.6%) underwent followup surveillance testing at a frequency that was concordant with NCCN® (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) recommendations. At the practice level, the median rate of guideline concordant followup was 26.5% (range 10% to 67.5%, p <0.001). Among patients with discordant followup, the absence of followup biopsy was common and not significantly different across practices (median rate 82.0%, p = 0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: Among diverse community and academic practices in Michigan, there is wide variation in the proportion of men on active surveillance who meet guideline recommendations for followup prostate specific antigen testing and repeat biopsy. These data highlight the need for standardized active surveillance pathways that emphasize the role of repeat surveillance biopsies.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; quality improvement; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663459      PMCID: PMC5315618          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

1.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.

Authors:  James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Improving adherence to cardiovascular disease medications with information technology.

Authors:  William M Vollmer; Ashil A Owen-Smith; Jeffrey O Tom; Reesa Laws; Diane G Ditmer; David H Smith; Amy C Waterbury; Jennifer L Schneider; Cyndee H Yonehara; Andrew Williams; Suma Vupputuri; Cynthia S Rand
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  A Statewide Intervention to Reduce Hospitalizations after Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Paul R Womble; Susan M Linsell; Yuqing Gao; Zaojun Ye; James E Montie; Tejal N Gandhi; Brian R Lane; Frank N Burks; David C Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.

Authors:  Leonard P Bokhorst; Arnout R Alberts; Antti Rannikko; Riccardo Valdagni; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Prostate cancer, version 2.2014.

Authors:  James L Mohler; Philip W Kantoff; Andrew J Armstrong; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Cohen; Anthony Victor D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Thomas A Farrington; Celestia S Higano; Eric Mark Horwitz; Christopher J Kane; Mark H Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Timothy M Kuzel; Richard J Lee; Arnold W Malcolm; David Miller; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; David Raben; Sylvia Richey; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Stan Rosenfeld; Edward Schaeffer; Eric J Small; Guru Sonpavde; Sandy Srinivas; Cy Stein; Seth A Strope; Jonathan Tward; Dorothy A Shead; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2015.

Authors:  Peter R Carroll; J Kellogg Parsons; Gerald Andriole; Robert R Bahnson; Daniel A Barocas; Erik P Castle; William J Catalona; Douglas M Dahl; John W Davis; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Thomas Farrington; George P Hemstreet; Mark H Kawachi; Paul H Lange; Kevin R Loughlin; William Lowrance; Paul Maroni; James Mohler; Todd M Morgan; Robert B Nadler; Michael Poch; Chuck Scales; Terrence M Shaneyfelt; Marc C Smaldone; Geoffrey Sonn; Preston Sprenke; Andrew J Vickers; Robert Wake; Dorothy A Shead; Deborah Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Anders Berglund; Pär Stattin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Improving quality through clinical registries in urology.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  askMUSIC: Leveraging a Clinical Registry to Develop a New Machine Learning Model to Inform Patients of Prostate Cancer Treatments Chosen by Similar Men.

Authors:  Gregory B Auffenberg; Khurshid R Ghani; Shreyas Ramani; Etiowo Usoro; Brian Denton; Craig Rogers; Benjamin Stockton; David C Miller; Karandeep Singh
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated with Increased Medicare Spending in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Liam C Macleod; Jonathan G Yabes; Mina M Fam; Jathin Bandari; Michelle Yu; Avinash Maganty; Alessandro Furlan; Christopher P Filson; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 4.  The Contemporary Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ariel A Schulman; Christina Sze; Efrat Tsivian; Rajan T Gupta; Judd W Moul; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  National consensus quality indicators to assess quality of care for active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: An evidence-informed, modified Delphi survey of Canadian urologists/radiation oncologists.

Authors:  Narhari Timilshina; Antonio Finelli; George Tomlinson; Anna Gagliardi; Beate Sander; Shabbir M H Alibhai
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Kidney Function Surveillance in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  David I Chu; Tiebin Liu; Priya Patel; Jonathan C Routh; Lijing Ouyang; Michelle A Baum; Earl Y Cheng; Elizabeth B Yerkes; Tamara Isakova
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Glenda Kith; Sarah Lisker; Urmimala Sarkar; Jill Barr-Walker; Benjamin N Breyer; Nynikka R Palmer
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-06

Review 8.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: selection criteria, guidelines, and outcomes.

Authors:  Colton H Walker; Kathryn A Marchetti; Udit Singhal; Todd M Morgan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Test Results in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS) Cohort.

Authors:  Daniel W Lin; Yingye Zheng; Jesse K McKenney; Marshall D Brown; Ruixiao Lu; Michael Crager; Hilary Boyer; Maria Tretiakova; James D Brooks; Atreya Dash; Michael D Fabrizio; Martin E Gleave; Suzanne Kolb; Michael Liss; Todd M Morgan; Ian M Thompson; Andrew A Wagner; Athanasios Tsiatis; Andrea Pingitore; Peter S Nelson; Lisa F Newcomb
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Tailoring Intensity of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Individualized Prediction of Risk Stability.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Yingye Zheng; Anna V Faino; Lisa F Newcomb; Kehao Zhu; Janet E Cowan; James D Brooks; Atreya Dash; Martin E Gleave; Frances Martin; Todd M Morgan; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Andrew A Wagner; Peter R Carroll; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.