Kotaro Higashi1, Toshiaki Yamagishi2, Yoshimichi Ueda3, Yasuhito Ishigaki4, Miyako Shimasaki3, Yuka Nakamura4, Manabu Oguchi5, Tsutomu Takegami4, Motoyasu Sagawa6, Hisao Tonami7. 1. Department of Radiology, Asanogawa General Hospital, 83 Kosakamachi-Naka, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8621, Japan. h550208@kanazawa-med.ac.jp. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Sabae Medical Center, Sabae, Japan. 3. Department of Pathology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan. 4. Medical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan. 5. Department of Radiation Therapy, Public Central Hospital of Matto Ishikawa, Ishikawa, Japan. 6. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan. 7. Department of Radiology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hypoxia is a key element involved in the development and progression of tumors. HIF-1α may transiently induce and mediate the response to acute and severe hypoxia, while HIF-2α may induce a longer response and may control the response to chronic and moderate hypoxia. Hypoxia increases the cellular uptake of FDG. Therefore, HIF may play an important role in the process of the cellular uptake of FDG. The aim of this study was to compare HIF-1α/HIF-2α expression with FDG uptake, Glut-1 expression, and prognosis in the patients with lung adenocarcinoma and to investigate the role of HIF-1α/HIF-2α in the uptake of FDG in lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In the current work, we compared the immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in surgical specimens of 44 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The relationships between HIF-α expression and Glut-1 expression, FDG uptake, and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a marginal association between HIF-1α and HIF-2α expressions (P = 0.076). We found a significant correlation between HIF-2α expression and FDG uptake (P = 0.0001). HIF-1α expression showed a marginal association with FDG uptake (P = 0.066). FDG uptake correlated more significantly with HIF-2α expression than with HIF-1α expression. A significant correlation was noticed between Glut-1 expression and both HIF-1α and HIF-2α expressions (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003, respectively). Univariate analysis of disease-free survival demonstrated that FDG uptake and HIF-2α expression, but not HIF-1α expression, were related to recurrence (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: FDG uptake correlated more significantly with HIF-2α expression than with HIF-1α expression, and both FDG uptake and HIF-2α expression, but not HIF-1α expression was correlated with post-operative recurrence in the patients with lung adenocarcinoma. These results suggest that both FDG uptake and HIF-2α expression may represent a more aggressive phenotype and that HIF-2α may play a more important role than HIF-1α in the uptake of FDG in lung adenocarcinoma.
OBJECTIVES:Hypoxia is a key element involved in the development and progression of tumors. HIF-1α may transiently induce and mediate the response to acute and severe hypoxia, while HIF-2α may induce a longer response and may control the response to chronic and moderate hypoxia. Hypoxia increases the cellular uptake of FDG. Therefore, HIF may play an important role in the process of the cellular uptake of FDG. The aim of this study was to compare HIF-1α/HIF-2α expression with FDG uptake, Glut-1 expression, and prognosis in the patients with lung adenocarcinoma and to investigate the role of HIF-1α/HIF-2α in the uptake of FDG in lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In the current work, we compared the immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in surgical specimens of 44 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The relationships between HIF-α expression and Glut-1 expression, FDG uptake, and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a marginal association between HIF-1α and HIF-2α expressions (P = 0.076). We found a significant correlation between HIF-2α expression and FDG uptake (P = 0.0001). HIF-1α expression showed a marginal association with FDG uptake (P = 0.066). FDG uptake correlated more significantly with HIF-2α expression than with HIF-1α expression. A significant correlation was noticed between Glut-1 expression and both HIF-1α and HIF-2α expressions (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003, respectively). Univariate analysis of disease-free survival demonstrated that FDG uptake and HIF-2α expression, but not HIF-1α expression, were related to recurrence (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:FDG uptake correlated more significantly with HIF-2α expression than with HIF-1α expression, and both FDG uptake and HIF-2α expression, but not HIF-1α expression was correlated with post-operative recurrence in the patients with lung adenocarcinoma. These results suggest that both FDG uptake and HIF-2α expression may represent a more aggressive phenotype and that HIF-2α may play a more important role than HIF-1α in the uptake of FDG in lung adenocarcinoma.