| Literature DB >> 27663425 |
M Sánchez-Castañon1, B G Castro2, M Toca1, C Santacruz1, M Arias-Loste2, P Iruzubieta2, J Crespo2, Marcos López-Hoyos3.
Abstract
AIM: The enumeration of intraepithelial lymphocytes subsets (total, γδ, and CD3(-) IELs) by flow cytometry (FCM), named as IEL lymphogram, constitutes a useful tool for celiac disease (CD) diagnosis. The aim of this study was to quantify IELs by FCM and their diagnostic value to differentiate active, silent and potential CD.Entities:
Keywords: Active celiac disease; Flow cytometry; Intraepithelial lymphocytes; Silent celiac disease
Year: 2016 PMID: 27663425 PMCID: PMC5035275 DOI: 10.1007/s13317-016-0085-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Auto Immun Highlights ISSN: 2038-0305
Fig. 1Selection of total IELs respect to the total cellularity of the duodenal epithelium, on the basis of their low 90° light scattering and CD45 expression
General characteristics of patients included in the study
|
| Age* | Sex (male/female) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active celiac disease | 60 | 9 (1–63) | 21/39 |
| Silent celiac disease | 20 | 36 (12–62) | 7/13 |
| Absent celiac disease | 161 | 42 (5–84) | 58/103 |
* Data are expressed as mean years (range)
Fig. 2a Percentage of total IELs respect to the total cellularity of the duodenal epithelium in the study groups. Box plots with median, quartiles and 5 and 95 percentiles. U de Mann–Whitney test was used to detect significant differences (P < 0.05). b Percentage of γδ IELs relative to the total number of IELs in the study groups. Box plots show median, quartiles and 5 and 95 percentiles. U de Mann–Whitney test was used to detect significant differences (P < 0.05). c Percentage of CD3– IELs relative to the total number of IELs in the study groups. Box plots show median, quartiles and 5 and 95 percentiles. U de Mann–Whitney test was used to detect significant differences (P < 0.05)
IELs populations and histopathology in active and silent CD
| Active CD | Mild histopathologya
| Severe histopathologyb
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| % Total IELs | 17.29 ± 14.28 | 25.95 ± 15.21 | 0.027* |
| % γδ IELs | 21.22 ± 14.28 | 29.44 ± 15.08 | 0.031* |
| % CD3– IELs | 11.36 ± 19.57 | 11.62 ± 9.77 | 0.027* |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
CD celiac disease
* Significant differences (P < 0.05)
aMild histopathology: Marsh I, II, and IIIa
bSevere histopathology: Marsh grade IIIb and IIIc
Serological markers in celiac disease
| AGA IgA+a | TTG IgA+b | AGA IgA+ and TTG IgA+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active celiac disease | 74 (40/54) | 87 (47/54) | 67 (36/54) |
| Silent celiac disease | 60 (12/20) | 70 (14/20) | 55 (11/20) |
| Absent celiac disease | 1 (2/156) | 0 (0/156) | 0 (0/156) |
Data are expressed as percentage (number of positive cases/total number of cases)
AGA IgA anti-gliadin IgA antibodies, TTG IgA anti-recombinant human tissue transglutaminase IgA
aAGA IgA+ ≥ 20 UI/L
bTTG IgA+ ≥ 4 UI/L
Serological markers in children and adult celiac disease
| AGA IgA+a | TTG IgA+b | AGA IgA+ and TTG IgA+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children (<18 years) | |||
| Active celiac disease | 77 (33/43) | 91 (39/43) | 70 (30/43) |
| Silent celiac disease | 67 (2/3) | 100 (3/3) | 67 (2/3) |
| Absent celiac disease | 0 (0/13) | 0 (0/13) | 0 (0/13) |
| Adult (≥18 years) | |||
| Active celiac disease | 64 (7/11) | 73 (8/11) | 55 (6/11) |
| Silent celiac disease | 59 (10/17) | 65 (11/17) | 53 (9/17) |
| Absent celiac disease | 0 (0/143) | 0 (0/143) | 0 (0/143) |
Data are expressed as percentage (number of positive cases/total number of cases)
AGA IgA anti-gliadin IgA antibodies, TTG IgA anti-recombinant human tissue transglutaminase IgA
aAGA IgA+ ≥ 20 UI/L
bTTG IgA+ ≥ 4 UI/L
Diagnostic value of optimal IEL lymphogram for active and silent CD
| Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal IEL lymphogram in active CD | 45 | 86 | 52 | 82 |
| Optimal IEL lymphogram in silent CD | 56 | 92 | 44 | 95 |
IEL lymphogram: total, γδ and CD3– IELs
IEL intraepithelial lymphocytes, CD celiac disease, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value