Literature DB >> 27662884

Implementation of a Multicenter Biobanking Collaboration for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Biomarker Discovery Based on Fresh Frozen Pretreatment Tumor Tissue Biopsies.

Sander Bins1,2, Geert A Cirkel1,3, Christa G Gadellaa-Van Hooijdonk1,3, Fleur Weeber1,4, Isaac J Numan1,5, Annette H Bruggink1,6, Paul J van Diest1,7, Stefan M Willems1,7, Wouter B Veldhuis1,8, Michel M van den Heuvel1,9, Rob J de Knegt1,10, Marco J Koudijs1,3, Erik van Werkhoven1,11, Ron H J Mathijssen1,2, Edwin Cuppen1,5,12, Stefan Sleijfer1,2,12, Jan H M Schellens1,13,14, Emile E Voest1,14, Marlies H G Langenberg1,3, Maja J A de Jonge1,2, Neeltje Steeghs1,13, Martijn P Lolkema15,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The discovery of novel biomarkers that predict treatment response in advanced cancer patients requires acquisition of high-quality tumor samples. As cancer evolves over time, tissue is ideally obtained before the start of each treatment. Preferably, samples are freshly frozen to allow analysis by next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing (NGS) but also for making other emerging systematic techniques such as proteomics and metabolomics possible. Here, we describe the first 469 image-guided biopsies collected in a large collaboration in The Netherlands (Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment) and show the utility of these specimens for NGS analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Image-guided tumor biopsies were performed in advanced cancer patients. Samples were fresh frozen, vital tumor cellularity was estimated, and DNA was isolated after macrodissection of tumor-rich areas. Safety of the image-guided biopsy procedures was assessed by reporting of serious adverse events within 14 days after the biopsy procedure.
RESULTS: Biopsy procedures were generally well tolerated. Major complications occurred in 2.1%, most frequently consisting of pain. In 7.3% of the percutaneous lung biopsies, pneumothorax requiring drainage occurred. The majority of samples (81%) contained a vital tumor percentage of at least 30%, from which at least 500 ng DNA could be isolated in 91%. Given our preset criteria, 74% of samples were of sufficient quality for biomarker discovery. The NGS results in this cohort were in line with those in other groups.
CONCLUSION: Image-guided biopsy procedures for biomarker discovery to enable personalized cancer treatment are safe and feasible and yield a highly valuable biobank. The Oncologist 2017;22:33-40Implications for Practice: This study shows that it is safe to perform image-guided biopsy procedures to obtain fresh frozen tumor samples and that it is feasible to use these biopsies for biomarker discovery purposes in a Dutch multicenter collaboration. From the majority of the samples, sufficient DNA could be yielded to perform next-generation sequencing. These results indicate that the way is paved for consortia to prospectively collect fresh frozen tumor tissue. © AlphaMed Press 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced cancer patients; Feasibility and safety; Image‐guided biopsy procedures; Next‐generation sequencing; Personalized cancer treatment; Precision oncology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662884      PMCID: PMC5313271          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  40 in total

1.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Randy F Sweis; Michael W Drazer; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Sequential tumor biopsies in early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents for pharmacodynamic evaluation.

Authors:  A Dowlati; J Haaga; S C Remick; T P Spiro; S L Gerson; L Liu; S J Berger; N A Berger; J K Willson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Mohamed Majdoub; Martin Vallières; Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; David Groheux; Elif Hindié; Antoine Martineau; Olivier Pradier; Roland Hustinx; Remy Perdrisot; Remy Guillevin; Issam El Naqa; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Intratumoral spatial distribution of hypoxia and angiogenesis assessed by 18F-FAZA and 125I-Gluco-RGD autoradiography.

Authors:  Maria Picchio; Roswitha Beck; Roland Haubner; Stefan Seidl; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Timothy D Johnson; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Gerald Reischl; Markus Schwaiger; Morand Piert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  dbNSFP v2.0: a database of human non-synonymous SNVs and their functional predictions and annotations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Liu; Xueqiu Jian; Eric Boerwinkle
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered.

Authors:  Rhodé M Bijlsma; Annelien L Bredenoord; Christa G Gadellaa-Hooijdonk; Martijn Pj Lolkema; Stefan Sleijfer; Emile E Voest; Margreet Gem Ausems; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Gene expression profiles from formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast cancer tissue are largely comparable to fresh frozen matched tissue.

Authors:  Lorenza Mittempergher; Jorma J de Ronde; Marja Nieuwland; Ron M Kerkhoven; Iris Simon; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Laura J Van't Veer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity in a vemurafenib-resistant melanoma patient and derived xenografts.

Authors:  Kristel Kemper; Oscar Krijgsman; Paulien Cornelissen-Steijger; Aida Shahrabi; Fleur Weeber; Ji-Ying Song; Thomas Kuilman; Daniel J Vis; Lodewyk F Wessels; Emile E Voest; Ton Nm Schumacher; Christian U Blank; David J Adams; John B Haanen; Daniel S Peeper
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.137

10.  Quantifying metabolic heterogeneity in head and neck tumors in real time: 2-DG uptake is highest in hypoxic tumor regions.

Authors:  Erica C Nakajima; Charles Laymon; Matthew Oborski; Weizhou Hou; Lin Wang; Jennifer R Grandis; Robert L Ferris; James M Mountz; Bennett Van Houten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Drug Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Blame the Barrier or the Brain?

Authors:  Sheheryar Kabraji; Jing Ni; Nancy U Lin; Shaozhen Xie; Eric P Winer; Jean J Zhao
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Sharjeel H Sabir; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Sanjay Gupta; Gordon B Mills; Wei Wei; Andrea C Cortes; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Michael J Wallace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  RNA-sequencing reveals genome-wide long non-coding RNAs profiling associated with early development of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Wanxin Tang; Xiaoke Ma; Dongmei Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-11

4.  Pan-cancer whole-genome analyses of metastatic solid tumours.

Authors:  Peter Priestley; Jonathan Baber; Martijn P Lolkema; Neeltje Steeghs; Ewart de Bruijn; Charles Shale; Korneel Duyvesteyn; Susan Haidari; Arne van Hoeck; Wendy Onstenk; Paul Roepman; Mircea Voda; Haiko J Bloemendal; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Carla M L van Herpen; Mariette Labots; Petronella O Witteveen; Egbert F Smit; Stefan Sleijfer; Emile E Voest; Edwin Cuppen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Theragnostic chromosomal rearrangements in treatment-naive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas obtained via endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Stephen J Murphy; Michael J Levy; James B Smadbeck; Giannoula Karagouga; Alexa F McCune; Faye R Harris; Julia B Udell; Sarah H Johnson; Sarah E Kerr; John C Cheville; Benjamin R Kipp; George Vasmatzis; Ferga C Gleeson
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  Cell membrane-camouflaged liposomes for tumor cell-selective glycans engineering and imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Zhengwei Liu; Faming Wang; Xinping Liu; Yanjuan Sang; Lu Zhang; Jinsong Ren; Xiaogang Qu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Predicting clinical benefit from everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors, the CPCT-03 study.

Authors:  Fleur Weeber; Geert A Cirkel; Marlous Hoogstraat; Sander Bins; Christa G M Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk; Salo Ooft; Erik van Werkhoven; Stefan M Willems; Marijn van Stralen; Wouter B Veldhuis; Nicolle J M Besselink; Hugo M Horlings; Neeltje Steeghs; Maja J de Jonge; Marlies H G Langenberg; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Edwin P J G Cuppen; J H Schellens; Stefan Sleijfer; Martijn P Lolkema; Emile E Voest
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-08

8.  Radiotherapy is associated with a deletion signature that contributes to poor outcomes in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Emre Kocakavuk; Kevin J Anderson; Frederick S Varn; Kevin C Johnson; Samirkumar B Amin; Erik P Sulman; Martijn P Lolkema; Floris P Barthel; Roel G W Verhaak
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 38.330

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.