Literature DB >> 27662604

Prognosis of Indirect Composite Resin Cuspal Coverage on Endodontically Treated Premolars and Molars: An In Vivo Prospective Study.

Maria Carlos Real Dias1, Jorge N R Martins2, André Chen3, Sérgio André Quaresma4, Henrique Luís5, João Caramês6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective clinical study evaluated the success rate of indirect composite resin cuspal coverage on endodontically treated molars and premolars and the survival rate of the restored teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty endodontically treated teeth were restored with total resin cuspal coverage and randomly selected for the study. Patients were recalled after 2 to 5 years for clinical evaluation. Data were subjected to standard tests of statistical correlations using Spearman test.
RESULTS: Out of the 150 teeth, 84 were molars and 66 were premolars. Of these teeth, 58.7% had mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities, 20.7% had mesio-occlusal (MO), and 20.7% had occlusal-distal (OD). A build-up procedure was performed in 51.3% of the teeth, and buccal veneer composite resins were placed at the margins of 96.7% of the teeth. Out of the 150 teeth, 30 (20%) presented margin discoloration, 3 teeth (2%) had restoration reparable fractures, 2 teeth (1.3%) had restoration irreparable fractures, and 1 tooth (0.7%) exhibited secondary recurrent caries. The opposing arch that occluded with the treated teeth presented 58% natural teeth (no restoration material), 26.7% ceramic crowns, and 15.3% implant-supported ceramic crowns. Statistically significant differences (p = 0.018) between irreparable restoration fractures and the type of support material present in the opposing arch were found.
CONCLUSIONS: In a period of up to 5 years, the resin cuspal coverage of endodontic treated teeth had a success rate of 96%, while the tooth survival rate was 100%. The type of support material on the opposing arch may influence the longevity of the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.
© 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Composite resins; dental cavity preparation; dental restoration failure; follow-up studies; root canal therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662604     DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  4 in total

1.  Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José Félix Mañes-Ferrer; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ján Staněk; Abanoub Riad; Adam Le; Matěj Bernát; Milad Hammal; Basel Azar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Patterns of Post-Endodontic Restoration: A Nationwide Survey of Dentists in Turkey.

Authors:  Sıla Nur Usta; Begüm Cömert-Pak; Eda Karaismailoğlu; Ayhan Eymirli; Derya Deniz-Sungur
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tzimas; Maria Tsiafitsa; Paris Gerasimou; Effrosyni Tsitrou
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2018-08-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.