Literature DB >> 27662571

Daily affect dynamics predict early response in CBT: Feasibility and predictive validity of EMA for outpatient psychotherapy.

K Husen1, E Rafaeli2, J A Rubel3, E Bar-Kalifa2, W Lutz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that individual differences in affect dynamics during depressed patients' everyday lives allow the prediction of treatment outcome and of symptom reoccurrence in remitted patients. In this study, we analyze whether understanding patients' affective states and their fluctuation patterns helps predict early treatment response (until session 5).
METHODS: Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) strategies allow in-depth analyses of real-time affective states and of their dynamics. Repeated assessments were made four times a day during a two-week period to capture real-life affective states (positive affect, PA and negative affect, NA) and dynamics (fluctuations in NA and PA) before the start of outpatient treatment of 39 patients. Due to the nested structure of the data, hierarchical linear models were conducted.
RESULTS: PA/NA ratios, as well as fluctuations in NA predicted early treatment response, even when adjusting for initial impairment. In contrast, mean levels of NA or PA, as well as fluctuations in PA did not predict treatment response. LIMITATIONS: The time between the EMA assessment and treatment onset varied between patients. However, this variation was not associated with early change.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that pre-treatment affect dynamics could provide valuable information for predicting treatment response independent of initial impairment levels. Better predictions of early treatment response help to improve treatment choices early in the treatment progress.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early response; Ecological momentary assessment; Emotion/affect dynamics; Patient-focused psychotherapy research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662571     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  7 in total

1.  Daily Affective Dynamics Predict Depression Symptom Trajectories Among Adults with Major and Minor Depression.

Authors:  Vanessa Panaite; Jonathan Rottenberg; Lauren M Bylsma
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2020-10-03

2.  Diurnal dynamics of stress and mood during COVID-19 lockdown: a large multinational ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Anja C Feneberg; Paul A G Forbes; Giulio Piperno; Ekaterina Pronizius; Ana Stijovic; Nadine Skoluda; Claus Lamm; Urs M Nater; Giorgia Silani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Depression risk factors and affect dynamics: An experience sampling study.

Authors:  Carter J Funkhouser; Ariela J E Kaiser; Kira L Alqueza; Vivian L Carrillo; Lija M K Hoffman; Carver B Nabb; Randy P Auerbach; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Compliance and Retention With the Experience Sampling Method Over the Continuum of Severe Mental Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Hugo Vachon; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Aki Rintala; Inez Myin-Germeys
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Movement-based patient-therapist attunement in psychological therapy and its association with early change.

Authors:  Brian Schwartz; Julian A Rubel; Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer; Wolfgang Lutz
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-09-27

6.  Cognitive and affective trait and state factors influencing the long-term symptom course in remitted depressed patients.

Authors:  Christina Timm; Bettina Ubl; Vera Zamoscik; Ulrich Ebner-Priemer; Iris Reinhard; Silke Huffziger; Peter Kirsch; Christine Kuehner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Using network analysis for the prediction of treatment dropout in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: A methodological proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lutz; Brian Schwartz; Stefan G Hofmann; Aaron J Fisher; Kristin Husen; Julian A Rubel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.