Literature DB >> 27662428

Toward a conceptual approach for assessing risks from chemical mixtures and other stressors to coastal ecosystem services.

Kristian Syberg1, Thomas Backhaus2, Gary Banta1, Peter Bruce3, Mikael Gustavsson2, Wayne R Munns4, Robert Rämö3, Henriette Selck1, Jonas S Gunnarsson3.   

Abstract

Growth of human populations and increased human activity, particularly in coastal areas, increase pressure on coastal ecosystems and the ecosystem services (ES) they provide. As a means toward being able to assess the impact of multiple stressors on ES, in the present study we propose an 8-step conceptual approach for assessing effects of chemical mixtures and other stressors on ES in coastal areas: step A, identify the relevant problems and policy aims; step B, identify temporal and spatial boundaries; step C, identify relevant ES; step D, identify relevant stressors (e.g., chemicals); step E, translate impacts into ES units; step F, assess cumulative risk in ES units; step G, rank stressors based on their contribution to adverse effects on ES; and step H, implement regulation and management as appropriate and necessary. Two illustrative case studies (Swedish coastal waters and a coastal lagoon in Costa Rica) are provided; one focuses on chemicals that affect human food supply and the other addresses pesticide runoff and trade-offs among ES. The 2 cases are used to highlight challenges of such risk assessments, including use of standardized versus ES-relevant test species, data completeness, and trade-offs among ES. Lessons learned from the 2 case studies are discussed in relation to environmental risk assessment and management of chemical mixtures. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:376-386.
© 2016 SETAC. © 2016 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical contamination; Coastal areas; Ecosystem services; Environmental risk assessment; Multiple stressors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662428     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  2 in total

1.  Ecosystem services deserve better than "dirty paper".

Authors:  Peter M Chapman; Henriette Selck; Neelke Doorn; Wayne R Munns
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Towards Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for the Australasian Region of Oceania.

Authors:  Sally Gaw; Andrew Harford; Vincent Pettigrove; Graham Sevicke-Jones; Therese Manning; James Ataria; Tom Cresswell; Katherine A Dafforn; Frederic Dl Leusch; Bradley Moggridge; Marcus Cameron; John Chapman; Gary Coates; Anne Colville; Claire Death; Kimberly Hageman; Kathryn Hassell; Molly Hoak; Jennifer Gadd; Dianne F Jolley; Ali Karami; Konstantinos Kotzakoulakis; Richard Lim; Nicole McRae; Leon Metzeling; Thomas Mooney; Jackie Myers; Andrew Pearson; Minna Saaristo; Dave Sharley; Julia Stuthe; Oliver Sutherland; Oliver Thomas; Louis Tremblay; Waitangi Wood; Alistair Ba Boxall; Murray A Rudd; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.992

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.