Literature DB >> 27662094

Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Lineage and X Chromosome Dynamics in Human Preimplantation Embryos.

Sophie Petropoulos, Daniel Edsgärd, Björn Reinius, Qiaolin Deng, Sarita Pauliina Panula, Simone Codeluppi, Alvaro Plaza Reyes, Sten Linnarsson, Rickard Sandberg, Fredrik Lanner.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662094      PMCID: PMC5628172          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


× No keyword cloud information.
(Cell 165, 1012–1026; May 5, 2016) Several errors occurred during the preparation of the above article analyzing the transcriptomes of single cells from human embryos at embryonic days (E) 3–7 and describing the segregation of prelineage (prelin) cells into trophectoderm (TE), primitive endoderm (PE), and epiblast (EPI) and X chromosome dynamics. We generated additional E3 and E4 cell data during revision that appeared within figures in the published text but were inadvertently omitted from Tables S2, S5, and S7. These tables have now been updated. To reflect the updated Table S7, the number of significantly differentially expressed genes between embryonic time points has also been updated in Figure S4A, as shown below. In Table S1, the subheadings of the mean and standard deviation columns were mislabeled as EPI and PE throughout the spreadsheet, even where the data presented were derived from other lineages. The correct column headings appear in the updated Table S1. In Table S5, we accidently inverted the prefixes “E5” and “E5_prelin” in labels of columns containing mean expression and standard deviation in the three sections with the subheadings “E5_prelinvsE5_EPI”, “E5_prelinvsE5_PE” and “E5_prelinvsE5_TE.” In addition, in sections comparing E5 vs E6 and E6 vs E7 cells in Table S5, we presented the data by lineage first and then time (EPI [E5vsE6, E6vsE7], PE [E5vsE6, E6vsE7], and TE [E5vsE6, E6vsE7]). However, the labels of these columns appeared as time first and then lineage (E5vsE6 [EPI, PE, TE] and E6vsE7 [EPI, PE, TE]), resulting in a mismatch between the label and the data columns. These have now been corrected. None of these changes, which appear in the article online, affect the conclusions of the article. We sincerely regret these mistakes and apologize for any confusion that may have arisen. Figure S4A. Preimplantation Developmental Progression of Lineage-Specific and Sex-Specific Genes, Related to Figure 4 (corrected) Figure S4A. Preimplantation Developmental Progression of Lineage-Specific and Sex-Specific Genes, Related to Figure 4 (original)
  55 in total

1.  No imprinted XIST expression in pigs: biallelic XIST expression in early embryos and random X inactivation in placentas.

Authors:  Huiying Zou; Dawei Yu; Xuguang Du; Jing Wang; Lei Chen; Yangyang Wang; Huitao Xu; Yunxuan Zhao; Shanjiang Zhao; Yunwei Pang; Yan Liu; Haisheng Hao; Xueming Zhao; Weihua Du; Yunping Dai; Ning Li; Sen Wu; Huabin Zhu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Use of a human embryonic stem cell model to discover GABRP, WFDC2, VTCN1 and ACTC1 as markers of early first trimester human trophoblast.

Authors:  Rowan M Karvas; Samuel McInturf; Jie Zhou; Toshihiko Ezashi; Danny J Schust; R Michael Roberts; Laura C Schulz
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Extensive cellular heterogeneity of X inactivation revealed by single-cell allele-specific expression in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Marco Garieri; Georgios Stamoulis; Xavier Blanc; Emilie Falconnet; Pascale Ribaux; Christelle Borel; Federico Santoni; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evaluating totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency.

Authors:  Eszter Posfai; John Paul Schell; Adrian Janiszewski; Isidora Rovic; Alexander Murray; Brian Bradshaw; Tatsuya Yamakawa; Tine Pardon; Mouna El Bakkali; Irene Talon; Natalie De Geest; Pankaj Kumar; San Kit To; Sophie Petropoulos; Andrea Jurisicova; Vincent Pasque; Fredrik Lanner; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  New Advances in Human X chromosome status from a Developmental and Stem Cell Biology.

Authors:  Benjamin Patterson; Yoshiaki Tanaka; In-Hyun Park
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.169

6.  Loss of DNA methyltransferase activity in primed human ES cells triggers increased cell-cell variability and transcriptional repression.

Authors:  Alexander M Tsankov; Marc H Wadsworth; Veronika Akopian; Jocelyn Charlton; Samuel J Allon; Aleksandra Arczewska; Benjamin E Mead; Riley S Drake; Zachary D Smith; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Alex K Shalek; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Vascularized human cortical organoids (vOrganoids) model cortical development in vivo.

Authors:  Yingchao Shi; Le Sun; Mengdi Wang; Jianwei Liu; Suijuan Zhong; Rui Li; Peng Li; Lijie Guo; Ai Fang; Ruiguo Chen; Woo-Ping Ge; Qian Wu; Xiaoqun Wang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 8.  Maternal H3K27me3-dependent autosomal and X chromosome imprinting.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Chen; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Single cell transcriptomics of noncoding RNAs and their cell-specificity.

Authors:  Katerina A B Gawronski; Junhyong Kim
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.957

Review 10.  Human X chromosome inactivation and reactivation: implications for cell reprogramming and disease.

Authors:  Irene Cantone; Amanda G Fisher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.