Literature DB >> 27661767

Comparison of the effects of four different cochlear implant electrodes on intra-cochlear pressure in a model.

Ingo Todt1, Marlene Mittmann1, Arneborg Ernst1, Philipp Mittmann1.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Based on this model experiment, a small tip and low volume electrode show lowest intra-cochlear pressure values. Insertional support by a tool minimizes fast pressure changes. Higher electrodes volumes affect slow and fast pressure changes as well.
OBJECTIVE: Insertion causing low intra-cochlear pressure is assumed to be important for atraumatic cochlear implant surgery to preserve residual hearing. Cochlear implant electrodes differ in terms of parameters like tip size, length, volume, and technique of insertion. The aim of this study was to observe the effect of different cochlear implant electrodes on insertional intra-cochlear pressure in a cochlear model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cochlear implant electrode insertions were performed in an artificial cochlear model and intra-cochlear pressure changes were recorded in parallel with a micro-pressure sensor positioned in the apical region of the cochlear model to follow the maximum values, temporal changes, maximum amplitude, and frequency of changes in intra-cochlear pressure. Insertions were performed with four different electrodes (Advanced Bionics 1j, Helix, HFMS, and LW23).
RESULTS: This study found statistically significant differences in the occurrence of initial maximum pressure values correlating with the electrode tip size. The different electrodes and the technique of insertion significantly affected the occurrence of maximum value, amplitude, and frequency of intra-cochlear pressure occurrence.

Keywords:  Hearing preservation; cochlear implant; intra-cochlear pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27661767     DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1232490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  4 in total

1.  Lateral Semicircular Canal Pressures During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: a Possible Mechanism for Postoperative Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Evaluation of a new slim lateral wall electrode for cochlear implantation: an imaging study in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Sini Sipari; Jyrki Tervaniemi; Dzemal Gazibegovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Julica Utca; Dania Karimi; Arne Ernst; Philipp Mittmann
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-11

4.  Intracochlear Pressure Changes After Cochlea Implant Electrode Pullback-Reduction of Intracochlear Trauma.

Authors:  Gina Lauer; Julica Uçta; Lars Decker; Arneborg Ernst; Philipp Mittmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.