Literature DB >> 27661643

Practice Bulletin No. 168 Summary: Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention.

.   

Abstract

The incidence of cervical cancer in the United States has decreased more than 50% in the past 30 years because of widespread screening. In 1975, the rate was 14.8 per 100,000 women. By 2011, it decreased to 6.7 per 100,000 women. Mortality from the disease has undergone a similar decrease from 5.55 per 100,000 women in 1975 to 2.3 per 100,000 women in 2011 (1). The American Cancer Society (ACS) estimated that there would be 12,900 new cases of cervical cancer in the United States in 2015, with 4,100 deaths from the disease (2). Cervical cancer is much more common worldwide, particularly in countries without screening programs, with an estimated 527,624 new cases of the disease and 265,672 resultant deaths each year (3). When cervical cancer screening programs have been introduced into communities, marked reductions in cervical cancer incidence have followed (4, 5).New technologies for cervical cancer screening continue to evolve, as do recommendations for managing the results. In addition, there are different risk-benefit considerations for women at different ages, as reflected in age-specific screening recommendations. In 2011, the ACS, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) updated their joint guidelines for cervical cancer screening (6), as did the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (7). Subsequently, in 2015, ASCCP and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) issued interim guidance for the use of a human papillomavirus (HPV) test for primary screening for cervical cancer that was approved in 2014 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (8). The purpose of this document is to provide a review of the best available evidence regarding the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27661643     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  Estimated Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes Associated With 12 Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  George F Sawaya; Erinn Sanstead; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Karen Smith-McCune; Steven E Gregorich; Michael J Silverberg; Wendy Leyden; Megan J Huchko; Miriam Kuppermann; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Cervical Cancer Screening-Moving From the Value of Evidence to the Evidence of Value.

Authors:  George F Sawaya
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Trends in the use of cervical cancer screening tests in a large medical claims database, United States, 2013-2019.

Authors:  Jin Qin; Shahram Shahangian; Mona Saraiya; Hunter Holt; Maribeth Gagnon; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Clinical validation of the Cervista® high-risk human papillomavirus test in Chinese women from Fujian province: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xiaodan Mao; Guanyu Ruan; Binhua Dong; Lihua Chen; Shuxia Xu; Fen Lin; Pengming Sun
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Adolescent and Young Adults with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Shuya Pan; Wenxiao Jiang; Shangdan Xie; Haiyan Zhu; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  Unindicated cervical cancer screening in adolescent females within a large healthcare system in the United States.

Authors:  Hillary Hosier; Sangini S Sheth; Carlos R Oliveira; Lauren E Perley; Alla Vash-Margita
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Comparative study of HPV and Cervical Cancer Knowledge and Beliefs between Mexican Immigrant Women in the US and Peruvian Women.

Authors:  John S Luque; Jonathan Maupin; Daron G Ferris
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2019-08-18

8.  Detection of Cervical Neoplasia by Human Papillomavirus Testing in an Atypical Squamous Cells-Undetermined Significance Population: Results of the Becton Dickinson Onclarity Trial.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; Mark H Stoler; Valentin Parvu; Karen Yanson; Karen Eckert; Salma Kodsi; Charles K Cooper
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  National screening programs for cervical cancer in Asian countries.

Authors:  Eiko Saitoh Aoki; Rutie Yin; Kemin Li; Neerja Bhatla; Seema Singhal; Dwiana Ocviyanti; Kumiko Saika; Mina Suh; Miseon Kim; Wichai Termrungruanglert
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Li Chen; Li-Ping Liu; Na Wen; Xiao Qiao; Yuan-Guang Meng
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.