Literature DB >> 2766111

The protective effect of vagus nerve stimulation on catecholamine-halothane-induced ventricular fibrillation in dogs.

M B Waxman1, A D Sharma, J Asta, D A Cameron, R W Wald.   

Abstract

Parasympathetic neural activity modulates some ventricular arrhythmias in man. Therefore, a canine model of arrhythmias produced by the interaction of halothane and catecholamines was used to study the effects of vagal stimulation on the induction of ventricular fibrillation. The dose of catecholamine required to induce ventricular fibrillation was determined during a constant heart rate. Vagal stimulation reversibly raised the norepinephrine dose that produced ventricular fibrillation from 16.4 +/- 2.4 to 30.0 +/- 3.8 micrograms (p less than 0.001, n = 10), and the epinephrine dose from 15.5 +/- 2.0 to 22.5 +/- 2.6 micrograms (p less than 0.001, n = 5). Following atropine, vagal stimulation failed to raise the threshold dose of norepinephrine (16.8 +/- 2.4 vs. 18.3 +/- 3.3 micrograms, nonsignificant, n = 6) or epinephrine (15.5 +/- 2.0 vs. 16.0 +/- 2.3 micrograms, nonsignificant, n = 5). Ligation of the cervical vagus nerves did not affect the epinephrine threshold dose (16.3 +/- 3.3 vs. 17.5 +/- 2.7 micrograms, nonsignificant, n = 5). Following elevation of basal vagal tone by morphine premedication, the norepinephrine threshold of 53.0 +/- 9.2 micrograms declined by a nonsignificant amount to 46.5 +/- 11.5 micrograms after vagotomy (nonsignificant, n = 5). Thus resting vagal tone does not prevent catecholamine-halothane-induced ventricular fibrillation, whereas increasing vagal tone by electrical stimulation substantially protects against this arrhythmia. The protection is mediated through a muscarinic cholinergic receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2766111     DOI: 10.1139/y89-127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0008-4212            Impact factor:   2.273


  9 in total

1.  Vagal nerve stimulation activates vagal afferent fibers that reduce cardiac efferent parasympathetic effects.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamakawa; Pradeep S Rajendran; Tatsuo Takamiya; Daigo Yagishita; Eileen L So; Aman Mahajan; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Marmar Vaseghi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  The antiarrhythmic effect of centrally administered rilmenidine involves muscarinic receptors, protein kinase C and mitochondrial signalling pathways.

Authors:  M Iwasaki; Y Hayashi; T Kamibayashi; A Yamatodani; T Mashimo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Effects of the opioid remifentanil on the arrhythmogenicity of epinephrine in halothane-anesthetized dogs.

Authors:  Natache A Garofalo; Francisco J Teixeira-Neto; Denise S Schwartz; Maria do Carmo F Vailati; Paulo V M Steagall
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Device-based autonomic modulation in arrhythmia patients: the role of vagal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  William A Huang; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Marmar Vaseghi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-05

Review 5.  Arrhythmias and vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Youhua Zhang; Todor N Mazgalev
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  The effects of atropine and methotrimeprazine on the epinephrine-induced arrhythmias in halothane-anesthetized dogs.

Authors:  F J Neto; F Massone; S P Luna; A A Camacho; J R Júnior; H M Ishiy
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Antiarrhythmic action of rilmenidine on adrenaline-induced arrhythmia via central imidazoline receptors in halothane-anaesthetized dogs.

Authors:  T Mammoto; T Kamibayashi; Y Hayashi; A Yamatodani; K Takada; I Yoshiya
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Control of ventricular excitability by neurons of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve.

Authors:  Asif Machhada; Richard Ang; Gareth L Ackland; Natalia Ninkina; Vladimir L Buchman; Mark F Lythgoe; Stefan Trapp; Andrew Tinker; Nephtali Marina; Alexander V Gourine
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Low-level carotid baroreceptor stimulation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ischemia.

Authors:  Kai Liao; Lilei Yu; Kang Yang; Gaowa Saren; Songyun Wang; Bing Huang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.