Literature DB >> 27660712

Increased FDG avidity in lymphoid tissue associated with response to combined immune checkpoint blockade.

Katy K Tsai1, Miguel H Pampaloni2, Charity Hope3, Alain P Algazi1, Britt-Marie Ljung4, Laura Pincus3, Adil I Daud1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have transformed the systemic treatment of melanoma and many other cancers. Understanding the spectrum of benign findings and atypical response patterns seen in immune checkpoint blockade is important for accurately assessing treatment response as these immunotherapies become more widely used. CASE
PRESENTATION: We report a 63-year-old man with metastatic melanoma successfully treated with combination CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade (ipilimumab and nivolumab), after non-response to pembrolizumab monotherapy. The initial impression of disease progression, based on cutaneous and PET/CT findings of increased fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in benign lymphoid tissue, proved to be erroneous after assiduous review of radiographic imaging and correlative pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that increased FDG uptake in benign lymphoid tissue seen on PET/CT may be a surrogate marker of immune activation and treatment response. Prospective studies will be invaluable in validating immune-related radiographic findings as a prognostic biomarker of response in cancer patients being treated with immune checkpoint blockade.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; CTLA-4; Immunotherapy; PD-1; PET/CT

Year:  2016        PMID: 27660712      PMCID: PMC5028983          DOI: 10.1186/s40425-016-0162-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother Cancer        ISSN: 2051-1426            Impact factor:   13.751


Background

Melanoma is an aggressive cutaneous neoplasm. Surgical resection for early stage melanoma is often curative, but metastatic disease carries a poor prognosis, highlighting the importance of accurate staging. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) combined with computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrate improved sensitivity and specificity for melanoma detection, and their utility in melanoma staging and monitoring is well established [1-5]. As systemic treatments for melanoma have advanced, there has been increasing interest in using FDG avidity not only for staging and monitoring, but as a predictive biomarker to assess prognosis and effectiveness of therapy [6]. We present a case of increased FDG uptake in lymphoid tissue as a surrogate marker of immune activation in a patient with metastatic melanoma treated with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab, following non-response to pembrolizumab monotherapy. Our discussion includes details of radiographic imaging and pathologic analyses.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old man came to the University of California, San Francisco in May 2015 seeking care for his melanoma. Review of outside medical records revealed that in August 2014, a biopsy of a left scalp lesion showed a non-ulcerated, 1.3 mm thick melanoma. He subsequently underwent wide local excision (WLE) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The SLNB was positive for a 4 mm focus of BRAF wild-type melanoma in the subcapsular region of a left cervical lymph node. A PET/CT scan did not show any metastatic lesions. During his consultation at UCSF, the initial diagnosis of stage IIIA melanoma was confirmed. Unfortunately, in the interim he had developed new hyperpigmented papules on his left chest. One was biopsied on 5/19/15, and pathology demonstrated features of epidermotropic metastatic melanoma. He was upstaged to stage IV melanoma, and on 7/1/15 was started on a clinical trial of intralesional IL-12. He had progressive lesions after 12 weeks on therapy, and on 9/15/15 was transitioned to standard of care pembrolizumab. He received two doses (10/5/15, 10/26/15) which were well tolerated, but had rapidly increasing size and number of hyperpigmented papules and plaques across his chest, bilateral arms and back. On 11/16/15 he received his first dose of combination ipilimumab/nivolumab. A PET/CT scan on 11/20/15 did not show any lesions concerning for metastasis. He went on to receive four induction doses of ipilimumab/nivolumab; a PET/CT scan was repeated on 2/11/16 and he was transitioned to nivolumab monotherapy. At this time, the patient remains on nivolumab and is tolerating treatment well.

Methods

Radiologic technique

Patient’s fasting time was at least six hours. Following intravenous administration of F18-FDG, CT was acquired from vertex to toes with intravenous contrast (Omnipaque 350), followed by an emission PET scan. A rotating 3D maximum intensity projection image, as well as axial, coronal, and sagittal PET images were interpreted.

Diagnostic dermatopathology

Punch biopsies of cutaneous chest lesions were obtained prior to and during immunotherapy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against Melan-A (clone A103; dilution 1:200) (Dako, Carpinteria, CA).

Diagnostic fine needle aspiration

Inguinal lymph nodes were visualized with ultrasound imaging. Targets were oriented in a position that allowed sampling throughout the hypoechoic cortex. On-site smear evaluation showed adequate material.

Results

Clinical findings

The patient had widespread cutaneous metastases that were readily clinically observed though not detected on PET/CT. His photograph on 10/5/15, prior to pembrolizumab, shows hyperpigmented papules scattered on the chest and neck (Fig. 1a). While receiving pembrolizumab, he developed increasing confluence of existing chest papules, and numerous new hyperpigmented papules on the neck, abdomen and bilateral upper arms. His treatment was changed to ipilimumab/nivolumab on 11/16/15 due to clinical concern for progressive disease. Upon completion of ipilimumab/nivolumab induction, clinical photographs were repeated on 2/23/16 (Fig. 1b). Although his appearance continued to be concerning for progression, there were subtle improvements (absence of new lesions, flattening papules) towards the end of the induction period.
Fig. 1

Clinical photographs prior to and during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition. Panel a shows a photograph of the chest from 10/5/15 prior to initiation of pembrolizumab, with numerous hyperpigmented papules and plaques scattered across the chest. Panel b shows a photograph of the chest from 2/23/16, after completing ipilimumab/nivolumab induction. There is increased confluence of existing lesions, as well as new hyperpigmented papules on the bilateral upper arms and the neck

Clinical photographs prior to and during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition. Panel a shows a photograph of the chest from 10/5/15 prior to initiation of pembrolizumab, with numerous hyperpigmented papules and plaques scattered across the chest. Panel b shows a photograph of the chest from 2/23/16, after completing ipilimumab/nivolumab induction. There is increased confluence of existing lesions, as well as new hyperpigmented papules on the bilateral upper arms and the neck

Radiologic findings

The PET/CT on 11/20/15, four days after the first dose of ipilimumab/nivolumab, showed no remarkable areas of FDG avidity (Fig. 2a). The PET/CT on 2/11/16 showed hypermetabolic lymph nodes throughout multiple nodal stations: in bilateral inguinal, iliac, and axillary lymph nodes as well as in the spleen (Fig. 2b). The inguinal lymph nodes were the largest, measuring 8 mm in short axis, and with increased FDG avidity (12 SUVmax). There was initial concern for progressive disease, however the bilateral pattern of uptake, preservation of fatty hilum, and concurrent splenic hypermetabolism (8.4 SUV max) combined with clinically slowed growth and flattening of cutaneous lesions were suggestive of FDG avidity as a marker of immune activation rather than progressive disease.
Fig. 2

Maximum intensity projection images of two whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT studies. Panel a shows the PETCT from 11/20/15, early in the course of immunotherapy. Panel b shows the PET/CT from 2/11/16, after completion of induction ipilimumab/nivolumab. Arrows indicate the increased metabolic glucose consumption in bilateral inguinal, iliac, axillary lymph nodes as well as the spleen, highly suggestive of immune activation

Maximum intensity projection images of two whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT studies. Panel a shows the PETCT from 11/20/15, early in the course of immunotherapy. Panel b shows the PET/CT from 2/11/16, after completion of induction ipilimumab/nivolumab. Arrows indicate the increased metabolic glucose consumption in bilateral inguinal, iliac, axillary lymph nodes as well as the spleen, highly suggestive of immune activation

Pathologic findings

The skin biopsy on 5/19/15, prior to pembrolizumab therapy, revealed a narrow diameter compound proliferation of melanocytes (Fig. 3a). There were nests of melanocytes within the lower epidermis and scattered single melanocytes in irregular pagetoid array above the basal layer of the epidermis. There were similar melanocytes in the dermis, and mitotic figures were evident among the dermal melanocytes (Fig. 3b). The melanocytes in the dermis generally did not diminish in size with descent. These findings were consistent with epidermotrophic metastatic melanoma.
Fig. 3

Punch biopsies of cutaneous lesions of the chest before (Panels a and b) and during (Panels c and d) systemic immunotherapy. Panel a shows a narrow-based compound melanocytic proliferation at low power (4×) with a few nests of melanocytes within the lower epidermis and a few melanocytes above the basal layer of the epidermis. In addition, there are nests of melanocytes within the dermis and mitotic figures are present among them. These features are consistent with metastatic melanoma. Panel b shows a high-power view (60×) of the melanocytes in the dermis, highlighting scattered dermal mitoses. Panel c shows a biopsy on treatment at low power (10×) with an area of complete regression of metastatic melanoma with dermal fibrosis and numerous melanophages. A high-power view (60×) of a Melan-A immunoperoxidase stain, shown in Panel d, does not show any labeling, confirming that there is no evidence of residual melanoma. Panel e shows the cytology smear from the inguinal node fine needle aspiration at 200×, with predominantly small unremarkable lymphocytes

Punch biopsies of cutaneous lesions of the chest before (Panels a and b) and during (Panels c and d) systemic immunotherapy. Panel a shows a narrow-based compound melanocytic proliferation at low power (4×) with a few nests of melanocytes within the lower epidermis and a few melanocytes above the basal layer of the epidermis. In addition, there are nests of melanocytes within the dermis and mitotic figures are present among them. These features are consistent with metastatic melanoma. Panel b shows a high-power view (60×) of the melanocytes in the dermis, highlighting scattered dermal mitoses. Panel c shows a biopsy on treatment at low power (10×) with an area of complete regression of metastatic melanoma with dermal fibrosis and numerous melanophages. A high-power view (60×) of a Melan-A immunoperoxidase stain, shown in Panel d, does not show any labeling, confirming that there is no evidence of residual melanoma. Panel e shows the cytology smear from the inguinal node fine needle aspiration at 200×, with predominantly small unremarkable lymphocytes A punch biopsy was obtained of cutaneous lesions on the right chest on 2/18/16, which showed melanophages and fibrosis. A Melan-A immunostain confirmed that no melanocytes were present in the dermis. These features were consistent with complete regression of melanoma (Fig. 3c, d). Fine needle aspiration of bilateral inguinal lymph nodes was done on 2/17/16. Pathology yielded unremarkable small lymphocytes, without evidence of malignancy [7, 8] (Fig. 3e).

Conclusions

Monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 and CTLA-4 are approved for advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma, and are being investigated in numerous other cancers. Use of immunotherapies is poised to increase in the coming years, thus highlighting the need for clinicians to gain expertise in immunotherapeutic response patterns. Historically, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have been the most widely accepted guidelines for defining solid tumor progression [9, 10]. However, atypical response patterns have been demonstrated in clinical trials of ipilimumab [11] and pembrolizumab [12], and have led to the development of immune-related response criteria (irRC) [11]. Described patterns of atypical response, or pseudoprogression, have included initial increases in the size of target lesions followed by decreases without the appearance of new lesions, and regression of target lesions but with appearance of new lesions. Benign lymphadenopathy has also been described as a radiographic finding in melanoma patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 therapy, the most common pattern reported to be sarcoid-like and in a bilateral hilar and mediastinal distribution. These findings were seen in a series of eight patients on anti-CTLA-4 therapy; there was no reported detail on FDG avidity. Interestingly, in the same series, radiologic evidence of immune-related effects seemed to correlate with response to treatment [13]. More recent efforts to identify an imaging biomarker have reported an elevated spleen-to-liver SUV ratio to be associated with increased overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 therapy [14]. Our case is the first report of FDG-avid diffuse lymphadenopathy occurring with combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade, with correlative pathology confirming benign lymphadenopathy and regression of cutaneous metastases. The initial clinical impression of disease progression proved to be erroneous after assiduous review of radiographic imaging and biopsy results. This highlights the importance of multi-disciplinary evaluation of these cases, and the need for more prospective work to evaluate FDG avidity of benign lymphoid tissue in a larger case series as a surrogate for clinical benefit [15]. Heightened awareness of the full spectrum of benign findings and atypical response patterns seen with immunotherapies will improve our care of cancer patients being treated with these increasingly widespread agents, and encourage further research and development of novel imaging biomarkers.
  14 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Fine-needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brian J Hall; Robert L Schmidt; Rohit R Sharma; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  L K Rodrigues; S P Leong; B M Ljung; R W Sagebiel; N Burnside; T l Hu; B W Ng; J R Miller; M Kashani-Sabet
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Primary staging and follow-up of high risk melanoma patients with whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: results of a prospective study of 100 patients.

Authors:  D Rinne; R P Baum; G Hör; R Kaufmann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Radiologic manifestations of immune-related adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy.

Authors:  Yulia Bronstein; Chaan S Ng; Patrick Hwu; Wen-Jen Hwu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Melanoma: Staging, Immune Modulation and Mutation-Targeted Therapy Assessment, and Prognosis.

Authors:  Powell Perng; Charles Marcus; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Initial assessment of positron emission tomography using 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in the imaging of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  L S Gritters; I R Francis; K R Zasadny; R L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Causes and consequences of increased glucose metabolism of cancers.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Ian Robey; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  12 in total

1.  F18-FDG PET/CT imaging early predicts pathologic complete response to induction chemoimmunotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer: preliminary single-center analysis of the checkrad-cd8 trial.

Authors:  M Hecht; S Semrau; M Beck; J Hartwich; M Eckstein; D Schmidt; A O Gostian; S Müller; S Rutzner; U S Gaipl; J von der Grün; T Illmer; M G Hautmann; G Klautke; J Döscher; T Brunner; B Tamaskovics; A Hartmann; H Iro; T Kuwert; R Fietkau
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy of Combining Losartan and Chemo-Immunotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Qing Zhao; Xuexin He; Xiyi Qin; Yu Liu; Han Jiang; Jing Wang; Shuang Wu; Rui Zhou; Congcong Yu; Suling Liu; Hong Zhang; Mei Tian
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  [Stable disease or complete response? : A critical evaluation of the radiologic response to immune checkpoint blockade in advanced melanoma].

Authors:  J K Tietze; M Heppt; D Angelova; T Ruzicka; F Berger; C Berking
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  In vivo imaging of the immune response upon systemic RNA cancer vaccination by FDG-PET.

Authors:  Stefanie Pektor; Lina Hilscher; Kerstin C Walzer; Isabelle Miederer; Nicole Bausbacher; Carmen Loquai; Mathias Schreckenberger; Ugur Sahin; Mustafa Diken; Matthias Miederer
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.138

5.  Monitoring anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET: introduction of iPERCIST.

Authors:  Lucas Goldfarb; Boris Duchemann; Kader Chouahnia; Laurent Zelek; Michael Soussan
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 6.  Unique challenges for glioblastoma immunotherapy-discussions across neuro-oncology and non-neuro-oncology experts in cancer immunology. Meeting Report from the 2019 SNO Immuno-Oncology Think Tank.

Authors:  Pavlina Chuntova; Frances Chow; Payal B Watchmaker; Mildred Galvez; Amy B Heimberger; Evan W Newell; Aaron Diaz; Ronald A DePinho; Ming O Li; E John Wherry; Duane Mitchell; Masaki Terabe; Derek A Wainwright; Jay A Berzofsky; Christel Herold-Mende; James R Heath; Michael Lim; Kim A Margolin; E Antonio Chiocca; Noriyuki Kasahara; Benjamin M Ellingson; Christine E Brown; Yvonne Chen; Peter E Fecci; David A Reardon; Gavin P Dunn; Linda M Liau; Joseph F Costello; Wolfgang Wick; Timothy Cloughesy; William C Timmer; Patrick Y Wen; Robert M Prins; Michael Platten; Hideho Okada
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy : Report on the EANM symposium on immune modulation and recent review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Rodney J Hicks; Christophe Le Tourneau; Stéphanie Lheureux; Stefano Fanti; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Cancer immunotherapy is accompanied by distinct metabolic patterns in primary and secondary lymphoid organs observed by non-invasive in vivo 18F-FDG-PET.

Authors:  Johannes Schwenck; Barbara Schörg; Francesco Fiz; Dominik Sonanini; Andrea Forschner; Thomas Eigentler; Benjamin Weide; Manuela Martella; Irene Gonzalez-Menendez; Cristina Campi; Gianmario Sambuceti; Ferdinand Seith; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Claus Garbe; Christina Pfannenberg; Martin Röcken; Christian la Fougere; Bernd J Pichler; Manfred Kneilling
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 9.  PET/CT imaging for tumour response assessment to immunotherapy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Marcus Unterrainer; Michael Ruzicka; Matthias P Fabritius; Lena M Mittlmeier; Michael Winkelmann; Johannes Rübenthaler; Matthias Brendel; Marion Subklewe; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Jens Ricke; Wolfgang G Kunz; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-11-17

10.  Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?

Authors:  Ferdinand Seith; Andrea Forschner; Benjamin Weide; Brigitte Gückel; Martin Schwartz; Johannes Schwenck; Ahmed E Othman; Matthias Fenchel; Claus Garbe; Konstantin Nikolaou; Nina Schwenzer; Christian la Fougère; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 13.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.