AIM: To evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the use of epidural anaesthesia within an enhanced recovery protocol in this specific subpopulation. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted, including all cirrhotic patients who underwent open liver resection between January 2013 and December 2015 at Bologna University Hospital. Patients with an abnormal coagulation profile contraindicating the placement of an epidural catheter were excluded from the analysis. The control group was composed by patients refusing epidural anaesthesia. RESULTS: Of the 183 cirrhotic patients undergoing open liver resections, 57 had contraindications to the placement of an epidural catheter; of the remaining 126, 86 patients received general anaesthesia and 40 combined anaesthesia. The two groups presented homogeneous characteristics. Intraoperatively the metabolic data did not differ between the two groups, whilst the epidural group had a lower mean arterial pressure (P = 0.041) and received more colloid infusions (P = 0.007). Postoperative liver and kidney function did not differ significantly. Length of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.003) and hospital stay (P = 0.032) were significantly lower in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter placement or removal was recorded. CONCLUSION: The use of Epidural Anaesthesia within a fast track protocol for cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resections had a positive impact on the patient's outcomes and comfort as demonstrated by a significantly lower length of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay in the epidural group. The technique appears to be safely manageable in this fragile population even though these results need confirmation in larger studies.
AIM: To evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the use of epidural anaesthesia within an enhanced recovery protocol in this specific subpopulation. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted, including all cirrhoticpatients who underwent open liver resection between January 2013 and December 2015 at Bologna University Hospital. Patients with an abnormal coagulation profile contraindicating the placement of an epidural catheter were excluded from the analysis. The control group was composed by patients refusing epidural anaesthesia. RESULTS: Of the 183 cirrhoticpatients undergoing open liver resections, 57 had contraindications to the placement of an epidural catheter; of the remaining 126, 86 patients received general anaesthesia and 40 combined anaesthesia. The two groups presented homogeneous characteristics. Intraoperatively the metabolic data did not differ between the two groups, whilst the epidural group had a lower mean arterial pressure (P = 0.041) and received more colloid infusions (P = 0.007). Postoperative liver and kidney function did not differ significantly. Length of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.003) and hospital stay (P = 0.032) were significantly lower in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter placement or removal was recorded. CONCLUSION: The use of Epidural Anaesthesia within a fast track protocol for cirrhoticpatients undergoing liver resections had a positive impact on the patient's outcomes and comfort as demonstrated by a significantly lower length of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay in the epidural group. The technique appears to be safely manageable in this fragile population even though these results need confirmation in larger studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Analgesia; Anesthesia; Complication; Epidural; Liver cirrhosis; Liver function tests; Postoperative; Postoperative care
Authors: L Bertini; G Savoia; A De Nicola; G Ivani; E Gravino; A Albani; F Alemanno; A Barbati; B Borghi; F Borrometi; A Casati; D Celleno; A Ciaschi; A Corcione; P De Negri; P Di Benedetto; M Evangelista; G Fanelli; P Grossi; M Loreto; E Margaria; P Mastronardi; C Mattia; F Nicosia; M Nolli; A Rutili; E Santangelo; J Sucre; V Tagariello; G Varrassi; F Paoletti; R Tufano Journal: Minerva Anestesiol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: Andrew J Page; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Tiffany Zavadsky; Michael C Grant; Daniel J Galante; Elizabeth C Wick; Matthew Weiss; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wu; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Declan F J Dunne; Vincent S Yip; Robert P Jones; Ewan A McChesney; Daniel T Lythgoe; Eftychia E Psarelli; Louise Jones; Carmen Lacasia-Purroy; Hassan Z Malik; Graeme J Poston; Stephen W Fenwick Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: G Niraj; A Kelkar; I Jeyapalan; P Graff-Baker; O Williams; A Darbar; A Maheshwaran; R Powell Journal: Anaesthesia Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 6.955